Democracy for China now
For most people who live in civilized societies, it is very difficult to understand the persistent threats from China against the Taiwanese government.
For the 1.3 billion Chinese, who do not own any property in Taiwan and do not have any voting rights, to claim Taiwan as their territory is also beyond comprehension. Moreover, for those Chinese who have never set foot in Taiwan to claim the right to rule over the Taiwanese merely due to similar ethnicity is not acceptable, not only in Taiwan but also around the world.
Many Taiwanese have in the past believed that the regimes from China would eliminate
the oppressive occupations of
foreign powers. Instead, their fellow ethnic Chinese have invariably persecuted Taiwanese far worse than the foreigners. The most recent example
is the Chinese Nationalist
Party (KMT), which treated Taiwanese as second-class
citizens. Within two years of
its arrival, the regime created shameful and rampant corruption that sparked a civilian
uprising; then it liquidated the finest of Taiwan's intellectuals who tried their best to assist the regime in ending the chaos.
The fact that they were lured into brutal executions by deception torments all Taiwanese, even after more than half a century. Four decades of suffocating repression -- Taiwan endured the world's longest martial-law regime -- followed that heinous atrocity.
Despite generations of
traumatic experiences, many Taiwanese still support the KMT in local and national elections. Many Taiwanese businesspeople also invest heavily in China, attesting to the strong affinity of some Taiwanese toward China. However, China's persistent military threats and its policy of isolating Taiwan reinforces the past's unbearable sufferings. Once again Taiwanese are demoted to second-class citizens and deprived of human dignity by China. In this sad historical context, Taiwanese are now
reluctantly distancing themselves from China, and they
believe that the current Chinese regime will do more harm to them than the KMT.
Nevertheless, many Taiwanese still earnestly hope that one day China will become a democracy. Then the conflict across the Taiwan Strait will
be solved within a mutually
acceptable system. Such a day is not near, as autonomy for Tibet and democracy in Hong Kong and China are losing ground, not to mention the worsening suppression of religious freedom and persecution of Falun Gong followers.
We entreat all Chinese officials to consider that it is to their own advantage to embrace democracy. In the current system, not a single individual will be protected from authoritarian rule. Many of your prominent predecessors suffered such a sad fate in the past. Sacrificing lives to achieve unification is outdated in modern society.
Please accept democracy now! It is just a simple change of attitude. Then you and your families as well as 1.3 billion Chinese will enjoy peaceful and civilized lives. The problems of Hong Kong, Taiwan, religions and Falun Gong will become irrelevant. You will gladly accept Taiwan independence and complete autonomy for Tibet and Hong Kong. His Holiness the Dalai Lama will happily return to Tibet and rejoice with all Tibetans for the restoration of their treasured culture. You will be the savior of not only China but also the entire world. Your past mistakes in sacrificing millions of innocent people in the name of communism and nationalism will be forgiven. You will bathe in the triumph of decency with ethnic Chinese around the globe.
Ming Chang, Albert Chen,
Ting Chen, Chi Su, Thomas Tsai and Samuel Yang
United States
Just who voided the ballots?
Thanks to Lee Chang-kuei (
I agree with the article except for Lee's contention that "the unusually high number of invalid ballots ... was caused by the newly adopted stricter criteria of validity, introduced to frustrate vote buying."
We know that these criteria had in fact been strongly manipulated by the KMT well before the election. It wasn't designed to frustrate vote buying, but was a trick to eliminate formerly valid ballots supporting the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP). The KMT knew from experience that many DPP supporters were illiterate or aged people who would identify their choice not by the name or the number printed on the ballot but by the picture of the candidate. These voters would simply and innocently place a stamp on the picture -- and it would be counted as valid.
But this was not the case at this year's presidential election.
Around 300,000 invalid ballots were identified in the election -- so the trick worked as the KMT hoped. Yet the pan-blue camp filed a lawsuit demanding a recount because of the large number of invalid ballots.
As the saying goes, "He who plays tricks must be prepared to take a joke."
Janet Chang
Chiayi
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have each given their thoughts on Russia’s war with Ukraine. There are a few proponents of US skepticism in Taiwan taking advantage of developments to write articles claiming that the US would arbitrarily abandon Ukraine. The reality is that when one understands Trump’s negotiating habits, one sees that he brings up all variables of a situation prior to discussion, using broad negotiations to take charge. As for his ultimate goals and the aces up his sleeve, he wants to keep things vague for