"Mr. Hu Jintao (
Beijing's principle that "there is only one China and Taiwan is a part of that China" is a fiction. Taiwan has never been a part of the People's Republic of China, which was established in 1949. In 1895, China ceded Taiwan to Japan in a peace treaty signed by the two countries. For the next half-century Taiwan was a Japanese colony. After Japan's defeat in 1945 it renounced sovereignty over Taiwan. This renouncement of sovereignty was officially confirmed in the 1951 San Francisco peace treaty signed by Japan and over 50 allied nations. Even the subsequent 1952 treaty between Japan and Chiang Kai-shek's (
Indeed, until 1979 the US recognized Taiwan as a sovereign country. Unfortunately for the people of Taiwan, the process of US derecognition of Taiwan began in 1972. Seeking to detach the PRC from the Soviet camp during the Cold War and to gain Beijing's help in ending the Vietnam War, then US president Richard Nixon agreed to "acknowledge" that the Chinese on both sides of the Taiwan Strait had claimed Taiwan to be a part of China. The US government switched its diplomatic recognition to Beijing in 1979, and in the process began a stampede of nations severing their diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Taiwan had earlier been kicked out of the UN, and consequently has been isolated diplomatically since the 1970s.
The Cold War was over by the late 1980s, when the Soviet-led communist camp broke up and the Soviet Union dissolved, leaving the US as the world's sole superpower. China's leaders wisely decided to occupy themselves primarily with economic development. Yet while China has claimed that it is striving to "rise up peacefully," it has nevertheless continued to threaten Taiwan militarily.
Taiwan has been undergoing rapid and drastic changes also. In the late 1960s the nation accelerated its economic development process and by the late 1980s it had become one of Asia's four newly industrialized countries. However, it remained under the KMT government's authoritarian rule, which had begun in the 1945 aftermath of Japan's surrender when US General Douglas MacArthur entrusted Chiang and his government with the occupation and administration of Taiwan.
Under the rule of Chiang and later his son, the people of Taiwan had no real voice. But a long and painful process of democratization resulted in Taiwan being listed by the US-based Freedom House conservative think tank as one of Asia's two freest countries, Japan being the other.
Less than 10 percent of Taiwanese consider themselves Chinese. An even smaller percentage of the nation's population would want Taiwan to become part of undemocratic China. What people really want is an independent country in which they are masters of their own destiny. Having elected their president since 1996, the people of Taiwan are indeed the owners of national sovereignty. In this age of human rights, the US and other democratic nations are obligated to support Taiwan, which shares their liberal democratic values, such as respect for human rights and the rule of law.
Given a changed world and the nation's new circumstances, the US must re-assess its Taiwan policy. The US cannot afford to continue to be stuck with a Cold War-era policy based on the "one China" myth. Furthermore, at a time when the US is playing a major role in promoting its democracy worldwide, particularly in Afghanistan and Iraq, Taiwan must be liberated from diplomatic isolation so that it can serve as a beacon of democracy in Asia.
One can understand why the US does not recognize Cuba and North Korea, which are both communist countries. However, it is increasingly difficult for the US to justify its refusal to recognize a free and democratic Taiwan. Instead of treating Taiwan merely as a trustworthy ally under the US' less-than-guaranteed military protection, the US must now work for Taiwan's return to the international community wherein it is a member state no less than the newly established East Timor. But first of all, the US must face reality and grant Taiwan diplomatic recognition.
Chen Ching-chih is a history professor emeritus at Southern Illinois University.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS