In recent years, arms procurement has been the subject of a lot of controversy. The controversy -- much of it originating in the Legislative Yuan, which is in charge of approving procurement budgets -- has centered on the necessity of weapons systems, the price of those systems and the potential for corruption.
A 15-member legislative delegation headed by Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (
How to strike a balance between among various legitimate concerns is a very challenging task. But, in trying to accomplish this difficult task, it is imperative to keep in mind Taiwan's unique circumstances -- circumstances that complicate an issue that is controversial even in other countries.
It is no exaggeration to say that the nation is in dire need of certain weapons systems, especially considering the enormous threat from China and the imbalance in military power between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait. No wonder the US has repeatedly expressed its concern about the situation.
Lee Wen-chung (
Unfortunately, despite serious threats, many opposition legislators have continued to accuse the government of engaging in an arms race with China. Given the nation's current situation, it is in fact laughable to depict the situation as an "arms race." Taiwan is only allowed to purchase defensive arms from the US under the Taiwan Relations Act, while China faces no such prohibition and has not even bothered to conceal its intention to become a military superpower on a par with the US. With the two sides on such a completely unequal footing, how can there possibly be an arms race between China and Taiwan?
It is difficult to understand how so many people can overlook the need to enhance the nation's defense capabilities, preferring to depend instead on the US to come to the nation's aid in a timely manner.
There are two obvious problems with this position. One, in the event of a Chinese attack, Taiwan would need to have a sufficient defense capability to hold off the Chinese until the US could make its power felt; and two, defending one's country is a sacred responsibility and it is irresponsible, not to say contemptible, to depend on other countries to do it instead.
Unfortunately, despite the nation's need for arms to help it defend itself, Taiwan has access to very limited channels through which it can purchase weapons. This of course has much to do with China's threatening and coercing other countries to not sell arms to Taiwan. The US is virtually the only country willing and able to ignore China's pressure.
Between the US and Taiwan, this creates an imbalance in supply and demand, so it is hardly surprising that the US isn't exactly handing out bargains.
On the other hand, this does not mean that the sky is the limit as far as prices are concerned. Therefore, all efforts to get the best value for money under these unusual circumstances -- including efforts by the Legislative Yuan -- ought to be appreciated. After all, it is the people's money that is at stake here.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS