When Hong Kong residents rallied to commemorate the fifteenth anniversary of the bloody Tiananmen Square crackdown, they mourned with a question in mind: Why did 1989's wave of democratization help end communist rule in Russia and across Eastern Europe, when at Tiananmen it heralded a rollback of people's rights that has lasted 15 years since then?
Princeton University professor Yu Ying-shih (
Earlier this year, some Beijing scholars described China's policy framework as "market economy, elite alliance, authoritarian politics," claiming that this framework will remain unchanged for the next 10 years. Such is the autocracy that has emerged in China since 1989. After a visit to southern China, the late Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平) gave the green light to a free-market economy, linking China's bureaucracy to international capital to strengthen the dictatorship's effectiveness.
This link between the bureaucracy and capital allows Deng to create an alliance of elites, buying support from the intellectual elite. By using superpower diplomacy and taking advantages of its role as "factory of the world" and its own huge market, China could force Western countries to make political compromises. In fact, China's authoritarian politics is just another name for one-party rule.
China has tightened its restrictions on news and publications; even references to the anti-rightist movement and the Cultural Revolution became taboo. The regime further enforces its rule using special agents and authoritarian measures to nip all possible unrest in the bud, including the high-tech monitoring of online media. Doubtlessly, the goal of China's "stability above all" is to maintain the existing order.
Under China's severe controls and softer tactics, the limited freedoms of 1989 have evapo-rated. Not only are rallies and demonstrations strictly regulated, but the iconic figures of the Tiananmen incident also disappeared from the contemporary political scene. These figures include Bao Tong (鮑彤) , Yen Chia-chi (嚴家其), Fang Lizhi (方勵之) , Liu Binyan (劉賓雁) and Liu Xiaobo (劉曉波), to name a few.
Two countries survive under the tiger's claws: Hong Kong and Taiwan. Although Hong Kong and Taiwan face different situations (Hong Kong's as "one country, two systems" and Taiwan's as "one country on either side of the strait") and their residents have different agendas, the people in Hong Kong and Taiwan share the same memory of the massacre.
As the interactions among Hong Kong, China and Taiwan become more frequent, the freedom and democracy Hong Kong and Taiwan enjoy certainly will impinge on China's one-party rule. China has switched its targets, eyeing Hong Kong and Taiwan with hostility.
Nonetheless, each armed with its own strengths, Hong Kong and Taiwan are able to stand up against China's unification campaigns to different degrees. Taiwan in particular has mature democratic institutions, so China's roar fails to intimidate.
Although Hong Kong is still struggling in the tiger's grip, its 6 million free people will never succumb to slavery. Their hope for democracy is expressed each year in a candlelight vigil that commemorates the Tiananmen tragedy.
Jin Zhong is the editor of Hong Kong-based Open Magazine.
Translated by Wang Hsiao-wen
Taiwan is a small, humble place. There is no Eiffel Tower, no pyramids — no singular attraction that draws the world’s attention. If it makes headlines, it is because China wants to invade. Yet, those who find their way here by some twist of fate often fall in love. If you ask them why, some cite numbers showing it is one of the freest and safest countries in the world. Others talk about something harder to name: The quiet order of queues, the shared umbrellas for anyone caught in the rain, the way people stand so elderly riders can sit, the
Taiwan’s fall would be “a disaster for American interests,” US President Donald Trump’s nominee for undersecretary of defense for policy Elbridge Colby said at his Senate confirmation hearing on Tuesday last week, as he warned of the “dramatic deterioration of military balance” in the western Pacific. The Republic of China (Taiwan) is indeed facing a unique and acute threat from the Chinese Communist Party’s rising military adventurism, which is why Taiwan has been bolstering its defenses. As US Senator Tom Cotton rightly pointed out in the same hearing, “[although] Taiwan’s defense spending is still inadequate ... [it] has been trending upwards
Small and medium enterprises make up the backbone of Taiwan’s economy, yet large corporations such as Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) play a crucial role in shaping its industrial structure, economic development and global standing. The company reported a record net profit of NT$374.68 billion (US$11.41 billion) for the fourth quarter last year, a 57 percent year-on-year increase, with revenue reaching NT$868.46 billion, a 39 percent increase. Taiwan’s GDP last year was about NT$24.62 trillion, according to the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, meaning TSMC’s quarterly revenue alone accounted for about 3.5 percent of Taiwan’s GDP last year, with the company’s
In an eloquently written piece published on Sunday, French-Taiwanese education and policy consultant Ninon Godefroy presents an interesting take on the Taiwanese character, as viewed from the eyes of an — at least partial — outsider. She muses that the non-assuming and quiet efficiency of a particularly Taiwanese approach to life and work is behind the global success stories of two very different Taiwanese institutions: Din Tai Fung and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC). Godefroy said that it is this “humble” approach that endears the nation to visitors, over and above any big ticket attractions that other countries may have
RSS