Although President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) struck a conciliatory note in his inauguration speech, it seems China will not accept this renewed show of goodwill. Most Chinese academics and experts denounced the speech in strong language and China's Taiwan Affairs Office and Ministry of Foreign Affairs have made their position clear, saying Chen's refusal to accept the "one China" principle and his stubborn insistence on independence remains essentially unchanged.
China will not be satisfied until Taiwan gives up and accepts the "one China" principle. But by appearing weak, Taiwan could cause China to become increasingly overbearing. Such is the nature of rogue states, something the US has to recognize as it interacts with China.
China has recently been threatening the people of Hong Kong, and thus, indirectly, also the people of Taiwan, by saying it
will write a unification law. The people of Hong Kong believe China is trying to create this law as a substitute for the withdrawn anti-subversion legislation based on Article 23 of Hong Kong's Basic Law. Even experts close to Beijing believe the unification law is tougher than the legislation that has been withdrawn.
On May 15, Zhu Yucheng (
During his recent visit to Europe, Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao (溫家寶) said that China may write a unification law. Co-opted academics and mouthpieces of officialdom in China, as well as China-friendly overseas media, have used this as an opportunity to threaten Taiwan.
The creation of the law is apparently at the research stage, but suggestions have been made that it apply to Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan after its promulgation. When a Hong Kong journalist asked whether the law would apply to Hong Kong, the reply was that it would apply to "anyone." The same official also said: "We have received suggestions from our citizens that we should issue arrest warrants for separatists, and even more radical suggestions are included in the bill. This will in the end naturally be given detailed consideration by the
legislative authorities."
This shook the gathered journalists, because the official did not explain what those suggestions entailed. However, we can guess at what these radical methods might be if we look at the three Hong Kong radio hosts who have recently broken their contracts because they or their families have received threats, and then look at the criminal elements participating in the Chinese Nationalist Party's (KMT) and the People First Party's (PFP) protests.
These criminals have an alliance in Guangzhou aimed at opposing Taiwanese independence and pursuing the "truth" in the March 19 shooting of Chen and Vice President Annette Lu (
the participation of Taiwanese gangsters in Taiwan and China. Its leader was even involved in the KMT's assassination of Henry Liu (
China's socialism has been called a "criminal socialism," referring to its glorification of violence and its innate hooliganism. Wouldn't the employment of criminal gangs to achieve unification turn a unified China into an all-out criminal society?
Paul Lin is a commentator based in New York.
Translated by Perry Svensson
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS