Thank you for reporting on US Representative Jim Leach's coming to the presidential inauguration ("US announces its delegation to attend Chen's inauguration," May 16, page 1). His background makes him just about the most suitable American for this event. In 1986 in Washington I had the privilege of thanking him personally for what he was doing to help the Taiwanese people. He did quite a bit to help.
As one of the architects of the Taiwan Relations Act, Leach has helped Taiwan survive.
Years ago, Belgian author Simon Leyes told us what a disaster China was. But there was hope for change when former US president Richard Nixon established a relationship with China and, as Richard Holbrook wrote in 1982, agreed to disagree with China over Taiwan. Near the end of the 1970s, along came another president who dropped recognition of Taiwan and recognized China.
When that happened Leyes wrote a blistering article saying in effect that it would be impossible to do anything more wrong than that: America and China had established a satisfactory relationship, he said, and insisted that if the Chinese government wanted recognition by the US it would have to accept US recognition of Taiwan.
That US president was capable of doing good things but he missed the point completely in this case. Fortunately there were good and smart people around to give us the Taiwan Relations Act. And Leach helped Taiwan in many other ways -- just as he has helped the US. Even with many millions of citizens, Americans have a tough time trying to find the right man for president. Leach should have been given the job long ago. He does everything right. Welcome, Jim!
Frank O'Donnell
Taichung
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS