President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) is being sworn in today to his second term as president. Today also marks the fourth anniversary of the end of the Chinese Nationalist Party's (KMT) one-party dictatorship.
Following this year's presidential election, despite some unrest, society managed to maintain order, with people of every walk of life going about their business and the economy gradually recovering.
China still continues its suppression of Taiwan. A few days ago, Beijing issued a threatening statement accusing Chen of moving toward independence by planning to draft a new constitution.
The US, however, showed its commitment to cross-strait security by sending the aircraft carrier Kitty Hawk to patrol the waters off the Philippines and by warning China not to make any reckless moves.
Taiwan is thankful for what the US has done. Although Taiwan-US relations were put to the test during the presidential election due to Chen's insistence on holding a referendum, the friendship between the two countries will endure, in view of shared democratic values and the firm support the US has offered over the years. Taiwan cherishes this friendship and looks forward to more solid relations.
It is to be hoped that people from both the ruling and opposition parties will offer a loyal critique of Chen's performance during his second term, and uphold stricter standards.
Chen did not win an outright majority of the vote in the 2000 election -- and the opposition remained in control of the legislature -- so Chen constantly ran into obstructionism on the part of the opposition parties. Things were made worse by the fact that Chen was a new hand at governing the nation and that he had to overcome the burdens of decades of KMT "black gold" policies.
However, this time Chen won the support of a majority of voters, making this victory more important than the one four years ago. He now has four years' experience and his government is no longer a new government. He is thus responsible for the success or failure of his policies.
This newspaper, as a public institution, will therefore act as a social conscience, and not only encourage Chen but also criticize him when appropriate.
In a two-party democracy, the ruling party and the opposition are both bound by responsibilities: The ruling party cannot be arrogant and the opposition cannot avoid responsibility because it's in the minority.
These duties are inescapable, which means that in the event of a national or social crisis, the ruling party is duty-bound to eliminate the crisis. Opposition parties cannot escape responsibility for cooperating with the government to solve a crisis simply because they are not in a ruling position. This is the true sense of mature party politics.
Unfortunately, in the ethnic confrontation triggered by differing opinions about national identity, the KMT and the People First Party (PFP) have been unwilling to bear their responsibilities. They created conflict following the election, trying to push the nation into long-term turmoil to gain political benefit.
The opposition camp has long served as a tool of China, echoing Beijing's stance on the cross-strait issue. The KMT's pro-localization faction has called for party reforms, and many have suggested that the word "Chinese" be eliminated from the party's name. However, KMT Chairman Lien Chan (
The KMT's Central Standing Committee yesterday passed a proposal for a merger with the PFP. According to the plan, the party's name will remain the "Chinese Nationalist Party" after the merger. Party reform is absent from the plan -- one sees only Lien and PFP Chairman James Soong (
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS