The nation got a grim reminder yesterday of just how low China, and its accomplice the World Health Organization (WHO), will go to suppress Taiwan.
The annual World Health Assembly (WHA) meeting is scheduled for next Monday to May 21 in Geneva. As Taiwan's official delegation, accompanied by the local media, were set to leave for Geneva, WHO officials informed Taiwan's journalists late Tuesday night that because Taiwan is not a member of the UN, journalists holding a Taiwanese passport will not be allowed to cover the meeting.
The WHO officials said the decision on applications by Taiwanese journalists to cover the meeting will be handled by UN departments. WHO spokesman Iain Simpson told the journalists that the UN's decision was made due to the threat of international terrorist activities. This means that UN security staff will be more strict at the WHA meeting.
We know that the decision was not made by the WHO officials responsible for contacting the Taiwanese media. They were simply the messengers. Still, the nation's media were shocked and angered when told of the WHO's decision.
The sudden decision, which deviates from past practice, leaves Taiwanese journalists at a loss. The move locks the country's media out of the WHO and Taiwan's eighth attempt to join the organization.
This decision, so denigrating to Taiwan, is obviously politically motivated. It is plain that China lies behind it, once again putting pressure on Taiwan and making the UN and the WHO its accomplices.
Simpson's explanation is obviously a lie. Taiwan has an international image of being both moderate and friendly, and has never been a part of terrorist activity. If the UN wants to carry out security controls for meeting participants, it should direct its efforts at terrorist nations, including those threatening to use military force to "liberate" Taiwan.
China has of course designed various ways to keep Taiwan out of the WHO, while Taiwan, still under the threat of a SARS outbreak from across the Strait, is in dire need of WHO resources and assistance.
Beijing not only links up with other countries to block Taiwan's accession to the WHO, it also keeps Taiwan's media standing outside the organization's door. The Chinese authorities are probably afraid Taiwan's media would expose their evil doings.
We simply don't understand the WHO's decision. It is an organization made up of countries from around the world, of which China is but one. Yet China acts as if it were the master of the UN. On the issue of Taiwan, the UN dares not pursue a direction different from China's wishes. Even the world's superpower, the US, cannot dominate the UN, but apparently China can get what it wants. Are there countries out there besides China? Or have these countries already become Chinese colonies? It seems that saying no to China makes Taiwan the world's enemy.
The media environment is an indication of a country's level of democracy. China's dictatorship oppresses its media to sustain the regime. Today, the UN, the world's human rights protector and peacekeeper, acts as an accomplice, helping China to oppress Taiwan's press freedom. Is the spirit proclaimed in the UN Charter nothing but a joke?
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
RSS