China recently announced a push for "macroeconomic control measures" (
Many people think that China's development has greatly contributed to the world's economic development, but the fact is that the whole world has considerably contributed to the Chinese economy. Since Taiwan and Hong Kong have close economic relationships with China, the macroeconomic control measures will surely affect these two places the most. In fact, we must understand that Taiwan's export volume and surplus with China were not created by the latter. Instead, they were created by Taiwanese industries operating in China. In other words, the increase in our export volume and surplus with China has come in exchange for the decrease in that with the world. The increase is not a Chinese contribution to Taiwan, but a Taiwanese contribution to China. This is actually a result of China stealing Taiwan's industries.
Figures show that Taiwan's exports to China and Hong Kong account for 36 percent of its total exports at present. Four percent of Taiwan's GDP has been invested in China, and Taiwanese tourists visit China 4 million times per year. In the past, many people ignored the crises of drastic economic fluctuations and policy changes in China. Now that they have suffered losses, people may pay more attention to the high risks of the Chinese market. In addition to these risks, what is most serious is Taiwanese businesspeople's wishful thinking and their blind expectations. Yet the cooling down of China's economy at the moment may not really hurt Taiwanese investors. A more miserable situation will occur if Beijing does not carry out this policy, and its economic problems become worse.
If a bubble economy occurs in China, the recovery will take a long time. Therefore, to implement the control effectively, Beijing will inevitably be overzealous in correcting its mistakes. The degree of control may be as severe as monitoring every single credit transaction. Once the Chinese government suppresses the growth of certain industries, it will affect other businesses peripheral to those industries. Still, despite the fact that attempting such control is highly risky, there is a greater danger if Beijing just sits back and does nothing.
What is more worrisome is whether or not the macroeconomic control leads to a hard landing. Will Taiwanese businesspeople suffering from this policy transfer the damage to Taiwan? Lured by the rapidly growing Chinese economy, many Taiwanese businessespeople have forgotten the various opportunities for development in Taiwan. The government should seize this chance to help domestic companies upgrade themselves. It should also expand infrastructure and improve the investment environment, so as to keep the roots of local businesses in Taiwan.
From another perspective, there is one more purpose to China's macroeconomic control: to reduce the pressure on the Chinese yuan to appreciate. Once China's economic growth declines, the Chinese government will have a good reason to prevent the appreciation of the yuan. This is positive news for the New Taiwan dollar and other Asian currencies.
Many people used to mistakenly believe that China's economic development was superb, and that they could profit from business in China. For example, "China-concept shares" (中概股) were unstoppable in Taiwan's stock market, while local businesses were often overlooked. The implementation of macroeconomic controls by Beijing should serve to destroy this myth.
Chen Po-chih is the chairman of the Taiwan Thinktank.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS