China recently announced a push for "macroeconomic control measures" (
Many people think that China's development has greatly contributed to the world's economic development, but the fact is that the whole world has considerably contributed to the Chinese economy. Since Taiwan and Hong Kong have close economic relationships with China, the macroeconomic control measures will surely affect these two places the most. In fact, we must understand that Taiwan's export volume and surplus with China were not created by the latter. Instead, they were created by Taiwanese industries operating in China. In other words, the increase in our export volume and surplus with China has come in exchange for the decrease in that with the world. The increase is not a Chinese contribution to Taiwan, but a Taiwanese contribution to China. This is actually a result of China stealing Taiwan's industries.
Figures show that Taiwan's exports to China and Hong Kong account for 36 percent of its total exports at present. Four percent of Taiwan's GDP has been invested in China, and Taiwanese tourists visit China 4 million times per year. In the past, many people ignored the crises of drastic economic fluctuations and policy changes in China. Now that they have suffered losses, people may pay more attention to the high risks of the Chinese market. In addition to these risks, what is most serious is Taiwanese businesspeople's wishful thinking and their blind expectations. Yet the cooling down of China's economy at the moment may not really hurt Taiwanese investors. A more miserable situation will occur if Beijing does not carry out this policy, and its economic problems become worse.
If a bubble economy occurs in China, the recovery will take a long time. Therefore, to implement the control effectively, Beijing will inevitably be overzealous in correcting its mistakes. The degree of control may be as severe as monitoring every single credit transaction. Once the Chinese government suppresses the growth of certain industries, it will affect other businesses peripheral to those industries. Still, despite the fact that attempting such control is highly risky, there is a greater danger if Beijing just sits back and does nothing.
What is more worrisome is whether or not the macroeconomic control leads to a hard landing. Will Taiwanese businesspeople suffering from this policy transfer the damage to Taiwan? Lured by the rapidly growing Chinese economy, many Taiwanese businessespeople have forgotten the various opportunities for development in Taiwan. The government should seize this chance to help domestic companies upgrade themselves. It should also expand infrastructure and improve the investment environment, so as to keep the roots of local businesses in Taiwan.
From another perspective, there is one more purpose to China's macroeconomic control: to reduce the pressure on the Chinese yuan to appreciate. Once China's economic growth declines, the Chinese government will have a good reason to prevent the appreciation of the yuan. This is positive news for the New Taiwan dollar and other Asian currencies.
Many people used to mistakenly believe that China's economic development was superb, and that they could profit from business in China. For example, "China-concept shares" (中概股) were unstoppable in Taiwan's stock market, while local businesses were often overlooked. The implementation of macroeconomic controls by Beijing should serve to destroy this myth.
Chen Po-chih is the chairman of the Taiwan Thinktank.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS