While the opposition is still obsessed with de-legitimizing President Chen Shui-bian's (陳水扁) presidential election victory, Chen and his ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) have their eyes on the year-end legislative election. In the past couple of weeks, Chen launched a series of decisive moves with an aim to lay a solid foundation for DPP rule.
Chen first started a transition of power by introducing new party elites into the Cabinet reshuffle. With new blood injected into the government structure, Chen successfully opened an arena for cultivating party elites.
His second step was to activate a strategy for DPP nomination rules and stepping up cooperation with the DPP's partner, the Taiwan Solidarity Union, to make sure the pan-green force could secure a majority in the next Legislative Yuan. A de facto majority will pave the way for Chen's implementation of reforms and clear the obstructionism from the pan-blue opposition force.
Chen's rejuvenation of his own party and his determination to gain another victory in the national legislature will greatly influence Taiwan's political landscape and the potential party realignment.
In his first term, Chen was virtually handicapped by the pan-blue opposition. After his hard-won re-election and an emerging power struggle within the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), Chen is in an even better position in terms of enlarging his support base.
Having won a majority vote in the presidential election, Chen must strengthen his ties with the opposition party..
So how would Chen reach across the lines to the legislators of the opposition party? The old way was through pork and patronage. These techniques might still work if the Chen administration could accelerate its sale of the New Ten Construction Projects to local governments. With pressure from the rank and file to improve regional development, opposition legislators would not dare to block the government's proposal.
Another strategy is to appeal to ideological sentiment. While ideology always plays a role in how legislators behave, most are more interested in achieving something, getting re-elected and moving ahead. Some KMT legislators from the south have been complaining about their party's failure to embrace the mainstream "Taiwanese consciousness" during the presidential election. If they were to compete with candidates from the pan-green camp, they would have no choice but to echo Chen's ideo-logy of "Taiwan first."
Chen must act like a political consultant or advisor to the legislators on the other side of the partisan divide. He needs to educate them on the likely gains they will score if they cross party lines on a particular vote. He needs to explain to legislators of the opposition parties why his views make sense in the electoral arithmetic of his district.
But beyond political opportunism and self-interest lies an even more potent appeal: power-sharing. A party realignment in Taiwan after the December election is highly likely. To create an image as a "bargaining president," Chen should incorporate elites from the opposition camp into the government.
When the executive opens his doors and lets a member of the other party into the decision-making councils, it leaves more incentives for opposition legislators to defect to the DPP. In real politics, few people can resist the temptation or the appeal of relevance and power.
As the KMT leadership still resists the internal call for a power transition and democratic decision-making, it opens a gate for party realignment in Taiwanese politics in the near future.
Liu Kuan-teh is a Taipei-based political commentator.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS