While the opposition is still obsessed with de-legitimizing President Chen Shui-bian's (陳水扁) presidential election victory, Chen and his ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) have their eyes on the year-end legislative election. In the past couple of weeks, Chen launched a series of decisive moves with an aim to lay a solid foundation for DPP rule.
Chen first started a transition of power by introducing new party elites into the Cabinet reshuffle. With new blood injected into the government structure, Chen successfully opened an arena for cultivating party elites.
His second step was to activate a strategy for DPP nomination rules and stepping up cooperation with the DPP's partner, the Taiwan Solidarity Union, to make sure the pan-green force could secure a majority in the next Legislative Yuan. A de facto majority will pave the way for Chen's implementation of reforms and clear the obstructionism from the pan-blue opposition force.
Chen's rejuvenation of his own party and his determination to gain another victory in the national legislature will greatly influence Taiwan's political landscape and the potential party realignment.
In his first term, Chen was virtually handicapped by the pan-blue opposition. After his hard-won re-election and an emerging power struggle within the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), Chen is in an even better position in terms of enlarging his support base.
Having won a majority vote in the presidential election, Chen must strengthen his ties with the opposition party..
So how would Chen reach across the lines to the legislators of the opposition party? The old way was through pork and patronage. These techniques might still work if the Chen administration could accelerate its sale of the New Ten Construction Projects to local governments. With pressure from the rank and file to improve regional development, opposition legislators would not dare to block the government's proposal.
Another strategy is to appeal to ideological sentiment. While ideology always plays a role in how legislators behave, most are more interested in achieving something, getting re-elected and moving ahead. Some KMT legislators from the south have been complaining about their party's failure to embrace the mainstream "Taiwanese consciousness" during the presidential election. If they were to compete with candidates from the pan-green camp, they would have no choice but to echo Chen's ideo-logy of "Taiwan first."
Chen must act like a political consultant or advisor to the legislators on the other side of the partisan divide. He needs to educate them on the likely gains they will score if they cross party lines on a particular vote. He needs to explain to legislators of the opposition parties why his views make sense in the electoral arithmetic of his district.
But beyond political opportunism and self-interest lies an even more potent appeal: power-sharing. A party realignment in Taiwan after the December election is highly likely. To create an image as a "bargaining president," Chen should incorporate elites from the opposition camp into the government.
When the executive opens his doors and lets a member of the other party into the decision-making councils, it leaves more incentives for opposition legislators to defect to the DPP. In real politics, few people can resist the temptation or the appeal of relevance and power.
As the KMT leadership still resists the internal call for a power transition and democratic decision-making, it opens a gate for party realignment in Taiwanese politics in the near future.
Liu Kuan-teh is a Taipei-based political commentator.
US$18.278 billion is a simple dollar figure; one that’s illustrative of the first Trump administration’s defense commitment to Taiwan. But what does Donald Trump care for money? During President Trump’s first term, the US defense department approved gross sales of “defense articles and services” to Taiwan of over US$18 billion. In September, the US-Taiwan Business Council compared Trump’s figure to the other four presidential administrations since 1993: President Clinton approved a total of US$8.702 billion from 1993 through 2000. President George W. Bush approved US$15.614 billion in eight years. This total would have been significantly greater had Taiwan’s Kuomintang-controlled Legislative Yuan been cooperative. During
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) in recent days was the focus of the media due to his role in arranging a Chinese “student” group to visit Taiwan. While his team defends the visit as friendly, civilized and apolitical, the general impression is that it was a political stunt orchestrated as part of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) propaganda, as its members were mainly young communists or university graduates who speak of a future of a unified country. While Ma lived in Taiwan almost his entire life — except during his early childhood in Hong Kong and student years in the US —
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers on Monday unilaterally passed a preliminary review of proposed amendments to the Public Officers Election and Recall Act (公職人員選罷法) in just one minute, while Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators, government officials and the media were locked out. The hasty and discourteous move — the doors of the Internal Administration Committee chamber were locked and sealed with plastic wrap before the preliminary review meeting began — was a great setback for Taiwan’s democracy. Without any legislative discussion or public witnesses, KMT Legislator Hsu Hsin-ying (徐欣瑩), the committee’s convener, began the meeting at 9am and announced passage of the
In response to a failure to understand the “good intentions” behind the use of the term “motherland,” a professor from China’s Fudan University recklessly claimed that Taiwan used to be a colony, so all it needs is a “good beating.” Such logic is risible. The Central Plains people in China were once colonized by the Mongolians, the Manchus and other foreign peoples — does that mean they also deserve a “good beating?” According to the professor, having been ruled by the Cheng Dynasty — named after its founder, Ming-loyalist Cheng Cheng-kung (鄭成功, also known as Koxinga) — as the Kingdom of Tungning,
RSS