A recount of ballots cast in the presidential election finally began yesterday -- the largest vote recount in Taiwan's history. The local media's old habits of reporting unconfirmed information and rumors will probably recur in the coming days as the judicial authorities carry out this notable event.
This phenomenon can be seen from yesterday's television coverage of the recount story. Taiwanese audiences will probably fall victim to endless live reports once again during the recount. The media organizations' abuse of the fourth right of democratic societies will drastically diminish their little remaining credibility.
Yao Jen-to (
Although this kind of survey is not entirely trustworthy and Yao's mention of the ranking was meant to satirize the news media, undeniably much harm has been done to Taiwan's media organizations since the presidential election campaign. The problem lies in the media's over-emphasis on sensationalism, and the competitive pressure to be the first to report a story -- even if this means not making efforts to confirm it.
The problem is that the "news stories" the media have fought to report first are not facts but inaccurate reports made up either by these media organizations or by others. On the evening of the presidential election, for instance, all cable TV channels used false numbers before 6 pm to mislead the public to believe that the pan-blue camp's candidates, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Lien Chan (
A call-in show host, Wang Ben-hu (
As the recount is under way, we understand that the pan-blue camp's aspiration is to alter the presidential election's results. The green camp hopes that the recount will prove that its victory has been legitimate.
Yet Taiwan's voters are also watching closely the two camps' performance during this period. Their decisions regarding which parties they will support in the year-end legislative election will be based on the camps' behavior during this event.
Both camps should therefore refrain from attempts to use the media to disseminate false information to influence the recount results. Otherwise they are not only making the media accomplices in the crime of destroying harmony in our society, but the politicians and parties that deliberately mislead the public also will be cast aside by the voters once the truth is known.
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) has prioritized modernizing the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to rival the US military, with many experts believing he would not act on Taiwan until the PLA is fully prepared to confront US forces. At the Chinese Communist Party’s 20th Party Congress in 2022, Xi emphasized accelerating this modernization, setting 2027 — the PLA’s centennial — as the new target, replacing the previous 2035 goal. US intelligence agencies said that Xi has directed the PLA to be ready for a potential invasion of Taiwan by 2027, although no decision on launching an attack had been made. Whether
A chip made by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) was found on a Huawei Technologies Co artificial intelligence (AI) processor, indicating a possible breach of US export restrictions that have been in place since 2019 on sensitive tech to the Chinese firm and others. The incident has triggered significant concern in the IT industry, as it appears that proxy buyers are acting on behalf of restricted Chinese companies to bypass the US rules, which are intended to protect its national security. Canada-based research firm TechInsights conducted a die analysis of the Huawei Ascend 910B AI Trainer, releasing its findings on Oct.
In honor of President Jimmy Carter’s 100th birthday, my longtime friend and colleague John Tkacik wrote an excellent op-ed reassessing Carter’s derecognition of Taipei. But I would like to add my own thoughts on this often-misunderstood president. During Carter’s single term as president of the United States from 1977 to 1981, despite numerous foreign policy and domestic challenges, he is widely recognized for brokering the historic 1978 Camp David Accords that ended the state of war between Egypt and Israel after more than three decades of hostilities. It is considered one of the most significant diplomatic achievements of the 20th century.
In a recent essay in Foreign Affairs, titled “The Upside on Uncertainty in Taiwan,” Johns Hopkins University professor James B. Steinberg makes the argument that the concept of strategic ambiguity has kept a tenuous peace across the Taiwan Strait. In his piece, Steinberg is primarily countering the arguments of Tufts University professor Sulmaan Wasif Khan, who in his thought-provoking new book The Struggle for Taiwan does some excellent out-of-the-box thinking looking at US policy toward Taiwan from 1943 on, and doing some fascinating “what if?” exercises. Reading through Steinberg’s comments, and just starting to read Khan’s book, we could already sense that
RSS