US Assistant Secretary of State James Kelly's congressional testimony well outlined the present policy of the US towards China and Taiwan. He pointed out that the Taiwan Relation Act is the foundation for the US to maintain peace and stability in the region and emphasized maintenance of the status quo as the best way to preserve stability.
He also made clear that it is irresponsible of leaders of both the US and Taiwan to treat China's military threats as meaningless. Taiwan should share the US's concern and should refrain from acts or rhetorical statements that may be misinterpreted. The US should also send a clear and unequivocal message to China that it views "any use of force against Taiwan with grave concern [and] will maintain the capacity of the United States to resist any resort to force or other forms of coercion against Taiwan." To alleviate tension, the US "continues to urge Beijing and Taipei to pursue dialogue as soon as possible through any available channels, without preconditions."
Meanwhile, the US commits itself to "explore with our friends in Taiwan" how to promote "Taiwan's successful story for democracy in Asia and around the world ... to a global audience, and how we [the United States] can help to make Taiwan's instructive example available to all countries that are attempting to institute democratic reform."
The plight of Taiwan is not the question of whether it is an independent country or whether it is generally recognized as a member of the international community. The US recognized Taiwan as a sovereign country until formal diplomatic relations was severed on Jan. 1, 1979. In so doing, instability was introduced into cross-strait relations.
Over the past 25 years, while democracy progressed in Taiwan and China's threats intensified, tension between the US, Taiwan and China has escalated. Circumstances have dramatically changed, particularly in Taiwan. Since the Shanghai Communique was entered into in 1978, Taiwan transformed itself from a dictatorship. Martial law was abolished; general elections were adapted for the election of members of parliament and the president.A constitution is to be made according to the free will of the people of Taiwan.
Twenty-five years ago, the US adapted its "one China " policy because the governments on both sides of the strait claimed their China was the real one. Now the "one China" policy obviously becomes the root of problem. It is time for the US to re-examine and update its policy toward Taiwan. The burden of using military force to deter China's "grave actions" against Taiwan rests almost entirely on the US. The US should shift part of this burden to the international community by allowing Taiwan to join international organizations as an international entity, if not a country.
Taiwan's success as a democracy and economic force certainly should not be overlooked by the international community.
The US should bring proof of Taiwan's governmental and economic success to the world's attention so that Taiwan's existence will be recognized, and the security of the western Pacific be supported by the international community and protected by the rule of law.
It is laudable that "the United States continues to be a strong supporter of Taiwan's participation in international organiza-tions." To implement this goal, the US must take the initiative. The effort of the US to attain these goals, based on past history, lacked initiative. The US efforts appeared to be at China's behest.
The US must be able to break through the barrier of appeasing China. Taiwan's participation in international organizations is as important as arms sales for maintaining peace and stability in the region.
International organizations are also a forum for Beijing and Taipei to pursue dialogue.
Y.T. Hung is a lawyer practicing in Virginia.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS