The competition during the election campaign was the fiercest in Taiwan's election history. The chaos during the campaign was also unprecedented.
Specious statements were disseminated both domestically and internationally in attempts to influence the election, and politicians used freedom of speech as an excuse to have the media spread information aimed at slandering their opponents. The mass media's unrestricted dissemination of politicians' undisciplined behavior led to immeasurable social damage, affected public order and halted the development of social fairness and justness.
Democratic societies are particular about the freedom of speech, and encouraging everyone to express their different ideas is a phenomenon particular to diversified societies. Democratic societies, however, are not societies where one can do whatever irresponsible thing one pleases -- we all have to take responsibility for our actions.
In other words, without verifying facts, politicians may not arbitrarily challenge the integrity and morals of others and use the ubiquitous media apparatus to slander opponents and destroy their reputation, claiming that they are doing so to reveal a malpractice. Evidence in support of the truth may then begin to appear, proving that the target has been the victim of slander. But even though the truth then is clear for all to see, the damage has already been done because the untruths have been so widely disseminated.
Advanced societies should possess mature soul-searching capabilities and be restricted by legal and moral standards.
We have all seen the chaos following in the wake of the presidential election. Politicians doing their utmost to slander and humiliate their opponents obviously provide negative examples for social education in Taiwan. If we are incapable of standing up against their disorderly behavior, then Taiwan will see the disappearance of justice and the further spread of social confusion and unease.
Chen Lung-chu is the chairman of the Taiwan New Century Foundation.
Translated by Perry Svensson
US$18.278 billion is a simple dollar figure; one that’s illustrative of the first Trump administration’s defense commitment to Taiwan. But what does Donald Trump care for money? During President Trump’s first term, the US defense department approved gross sales of “defense articles and services” to Taiwan of over US$18 billion. In September, the US-Taiwan Business Council compared Trump’s figure to the other four presidential administrations since 1993: President Clinton approved a total of US$8.702 billion from 1993 through 2000. President George W. Bush approved US$15.614 billion in eight years. This total would have been significantly greater had Taiwan’s Kuomintang-controlled Legislative Yuan been cooperative. During
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) in recent days was the focus of the media due to his role in arranging a Chinese “student” group to visit Taiwan. While his team defends the visit as friendly, civilized and apolitical, the general impression is that it was a political stunt orchestrated as part of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) propaganda, as its members were mainly young communists or university graduates who speak of a future of a unified country. While Ma lived in Taiwan almost his entire life — except during his early childhood in Hong Kong and student years in the US —
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers on Monday unilaterally passed a preliminary review of proposed amendments to the Public Officers Election and Recall Act (公職人員選罷法) in just one minute, while Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators, government officials and the media were locked out. The hasty and discourteous move — the doors of the Internal Administration Committee chamber were locked and sealed with plastic wrap before the preliminary review meeting began — was a great setback for Taiwan’s democracy. Without any legislative discussion or public witnesses, KMT Legislator Hsu Hsin-ying (徐欣瑩), the committee’s convener, began the meeting at 9am and announced passage of the
In response to a failure to understand the “good intentions” behind the use of the term “motherland,” a professor from China’s Fudan University recklessly claimed that Taiwan used to be a colony, so all it needs is a “good beating.” Such logic is risible. The Central Plains people in China were once colonized by the Mongolians, the Manchus and other foreign peoples — does that mean they also deserve a “good beating?” According to the professor, having been ruled by the Cheng Dynasty — named after its founder, Ming-loyalist Cheng Cheng-kung (鄭成功, also known as Koxinga) — as the Kingdom of Tungning,
RSS