On May 17, the World Health Assembly will convene in Geneva, and Taiwan will again fight to gain observer status. New Minister of Foreign Affairs Mark Chen (陳唐山) indicated optimistically that Taiwan's years of efforts to participate in the World Health Organization (WHO) may very well be repaid handsomely at this event.
The attitude of countries such as the US and Japan toward Taiwan's attempt to obtain observer status has become much more positive than in previous years.
The US may even submit the proposal for Taiwan's participation to the assembly, and does not rule out the possibility of asking for a vote on the issue. Department of Health Director-General Chen Chien-jen (陳建仁) also suggests that Taiwan has a better chance of becoming an observer this year.
The biggest obstacle to Taiwan's participation in the international community is China. China has consistently boycotted Taiwan's participation in international forums of all natures, from political, to economic, to sports, to cultural, to medical organizations. It absolutely does not permit Taiwan's people to have any footing in the international community.
Taiwan -- despite its millions of citizens, economic vitality and acclaimed democracy -- is actually excluded from international activities that are universally deemed as compatible with fundamental human rights valued by modern civilized society. This has kept Taiwan from engaging with the international community and fulfilling its responsibilities as a member of the global village.
Therefore, while the courage and determination of the government officials trying to lead Taiwan out of this diplomatic stalemate are admirable, obtaining this observer status and eventually taking part in the WHO are not goals that can be accomplished within a short period of time. Our citizens must be psychologically ready for a long effort.
For as our nation seeks WHO observer status, China has also intensified its obstructions. WHO Director General Lee Jong-wook recently indicated in Beijing that according to the relevant WHO regulations the organization is open to all countries, and therefore, in comparison with other international organizations, it is relatively easier to join the WHO.
However, a very key word is "country," meaning that WHO membership is available only to sovereign countries, Lee said. Therefore, he told top-ranking Chinese officials, Taiwan has no hope of obtaining WHO observer status.
Lee even fabricated the lie that WHO abides by the "one China" principle, and said the organization will handle issues involving Taiwan according to this principle.
However, this biased statement was immediately clarified by the WHO, where a spokesperson pointed out that the issue of Taiwan participating in the WHO has long existed, that the WHO does not have any "one China" policy, and that member countries have the power to decide everything.
Lee's pro-China statements are indeed sickening. Chen Chien-jen has already pointed out that at least five WHO observers are not sovereign countries, including the Red Cross and and PLO, and that two areas that are not nations are considered member states.
Obviously, Lee's statement that WHO members must be sovereign states was quite untrue, fabricated solely to pander to China. Taiwan is already a sovereign country, and WHO's continued exclusion of Taiwan from participating is not only groundless but will ultimately damage this humanitarian organization. It is known for promoting health care and protecting human lives with policies that transcend differences of race, religion, sex, culture and politics.
Clearly that reputation is being spoiled in this disgraceful instance, in which Lee spread lies about WHO's "one China" policy and otherwise sang and danced to delight the Chinese. President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) and Premier Wen Jiabao (溫家寶) specifically discussed WHO's supposed "one China" policy with Lee, and China claimed that its "central government has always cared about Taiwanese people's health and welfare,pushed for cross-strait health and medical exchanges, and welcomed Taiwan to participate in the Chinese delegation" to the World Health Assembly.
Chinese Vice Health Minister Gao Qiang (高強) lied through his teeth in saying that "Taiwan's channel to information from the WHO is smooth and open, and that the Taiwan authorities' attempt to squeeze into the WHO through various excuses is made solely to justify its division of the mother country."
The truth of the matter is that the standard of medical care in Taiwan is definitely better than that in China. Taiwan has no need to be "taken care of" by China, which is incapable of caring for Taiwan. China repeated its "one China" myth to obstruct Taiwan's attainment of WHO observer status after China spread SARS to Taiwan, leaving this nation in dire need of the WHO's help. Some ranking Chinese officials even openly made heartless comments to the effect of "Who gives a damn about you guys?" -- ignoring the fact that Taiwan's people were fighting for their lives against the epidemic.
The big talk by other Chinese leaders about how they care about the health of Taiwanese and how they welcome Taiwan to join China's WHO delegation reveals only the phony and heartless side of Beijing.
Chen, Taiwan's top health official, cited four major arguments for Taiwan's WHO observer status this year, including that Taiwan's health care should not suffer as a result of Chinese obstruction. Taiwan is willing to share its public health progress and furnish medical assistance, particularly to help other countries match its successes in implementing WHO disease-prevention strategies against AIDS, malaria and tobacco-related hazards to human health.
Taiwan's efforts to obtain WHO observer status are motivated neither by selfish political agendas nor fabricated from political expediency. Rather, these efforts seek to protect health care rights and to share public health accomplishments for the greater good of humanity.
Chinese obstruction of these altruistic goals are not only futile but will also deepen the divisions between Taiwan and China, forcing the two sides further apart.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS