The "one China" principle is all but dead.
Granted, Taiwan has never been part of the People's Repub-lic of China, but more importantly, over the past decade and a half, the people of Taiwan have made it increasingly clear to the international community that they do not want their country to become part of China and do not want to be placed under communist rule. This is the reality that the US, China and the rest of the world will have to face.
Opinion polls show that the percentage of Taiwanese who favor continued separation from China has increased steadily over the years, while that of those who favor unification has declined. Today, only 12 percent of people support unification.
This trend is also reflected in the outcome of the presidential election. In each of the three direct presidential elections since 1996, and despite China's military threat and verbal attacks, voters elected the presidential candidate backing independence over the candidate favored by Beijing.
On March 20, President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), who has unequivocally and consistently stated that Taiwan is a free and independent country, defeated a rival who had adopted an ambiguous stand regarding Taiwan's sovereignty and who was backed by Beijing.
Chen secured just over 50 percent of the vote, an increase of nearly 12 percentage points from four years ago, when he defeated two rivals to win his first four-year term.
There is no doubt that Taiwanese identity has increased significantly over the past four years.
After nearly four centuries of alien rule, including Dutch, Manchurian, Japanese and Chinese Nationalist, the people of Taiwan have shown they are determined to exercise their hard-won freedoms and political rights to be masters of their own destiny.
Through the 228 Hand-in-Hand Rally, which extended more than 450km and drew 2 million people, and Chen's re-election, the people of Taiwan have resoundingly demonstrated that they reject Beijing's "one China" principle.
Today, Taiwan is a market economy. It has a per capita income of nearly US$15,000, or 15 times that of China. More importantly, according to the US-based Freedom House, Taiwan, next to Japan, is Asia's freest country, while China is one of Asia's least free.
Taiwanese elect all their representatives, including the president, while Chinese are only allowed to elect their township heads. The difference between Taiwan and China is like day and night.
No one should expect the freedom-loving Taiwanese to accept a brutal and dictatorial Chinese regime.
It is time for the US to discard the "one China" fiction, a relic of the Cold War era, and extend diplomatic recognition to a free and democratic Taiwan.
Chen Ching-chih is professor emeritus of history at Southern Illinois University at Edwardsville.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS