During his visit to China, US Vice President Dick Cheney met with the top four leaders, President Hu Jintao (
All the "four big heads" indeed focused on that issue, demanding that Washington keep its promises of insisting on the "one China" policy and opposing Taiwan independence and any changes to the status quo. They also demanded that Washington not send any "wrong messages" to Taipei.
But Cheney did not give in to the Chinese pressure. He even defended the US Taiwan policy in response to Beijing's opposition to the sale of a long-range early-warning radar system to Taiwan, as well as US commitment to the Taiwan Relations Act. He also stressed that the US has increased sales of defensive weapons to Taiwan due to China's expansion of ballistic missile deployment.
Still, he reaffirmed once again that the US does not support Taiwan's independence, and that "the US government is opposed to any unilateral moves on either side to change the status quo."
Cheney's remarks seemed to be a major disappointment to China. In fact, in the hope that perhaps he would come up with some unfavorable words about Taiwan, China's Taiwan Affairs Office cancelled its two regular press conferences after Taiwan's presidential election on March 20, wishing to make a fuss about Cheney's comments right before President Chen Shui-bian's (
Unfortunately, Cheney's call for an early resumption of cross-strait talks failed to attract Beijing's attention. In his speech at Shanghai's Fudan University last Thursday, his advocacy of both freedom and democracy, and the freedom to choose national leaders, also failed to attract any response there.
It remains to be seen whether his trip to China can add some points to the re-election bid of US President George W. Bush.
Looking into the future, Cheney's declarations that the US opposes any unilateral changes to the status quo across the Strait will remain the keynote in the triangular relationship.
Yang Chih-heng is an associate professor in the Graduate Institute of Southeast Asian Studies at Tamkang University.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
In September 2015, Russia intervened militarily in Syria’s civil war, propping up Bashar al-Assad’s dictatorship as it teetered on the brink of collapse. This was the high point of Russia’s resurgence on the world stage and Russian President Vladimir Putin’s ability to tilt the war in al-Assad’s favor helped make him a regional power broker. In addition to enhancing Putin’s stature, the operation led to strategic gains that gave Russia leverage vis-a-vis regional and Western powers. Syria was thus a status symbol for the Kremlin. Putin, who sees Russia as a great power on par with the US and China, attaches
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers on Monday unilaterally passed a preliminary review of proposed amendments to the Public Officers Election and Recall Act (公職人員選罷法) in just one minute, while Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators, government officials and the media were locked out. The hasty and discourteous move — the doors of the Internal Administration Committee chamber were locked and sealed with plastic wrap before the preliminary review meeting began — was a great setback for Taiwan’s democracy. Without any legislative discussion or public witnesses, KMT Legislator Hsu Hsin-ying (徐欣瑩), the committee’s convener, began the meeting at 9am and announced passage of the
In the weeks following the 2024 US presidential election, I have received one question more than any other from friends in Taiwan — how will Donald J. Trump’s return to the White House affect Taiwan and cross-Strait relations? Some Taiwan counterparts have argued that Trump hates China, so therefore he will support Taiwan, according to the logic that the enemy of one’s enemy is a friend. Others have expressed anxiety that Trump will put pressure on Taiwan to dramatically increase defense spending, or to compensate the United States for allegedly “stealing” America’s semiconductor sector. While I understand these hopes and concerns, I
With Washington substantially off-guard in power transition, China’s supreme leader, Xi Jinping (習近平), is intensifying an anti-corruption campaign against the top military leadership. At a glance, the move seems to be consistent with his emphasis on the necessity of enhancing military preparedness for a possible full military invasion of Taiwan, because the military is required to be well-disciplined without corruption. Looking carefully, however, a series of purges of several top military leaders since last year begs the question of what dynamics has worked behind the anomaly. More specifically, general Wei Fenghe (魏鳳和) and his immediate successor, Li Shangfu (李尚福), were removed as People’s
RSS