China's Taiwan Affairs Office spokesperson, Li Weiyi (
Li is taking advantage of US Vice President Dick Cheney's visit to China to aim this very imaginative statement at the US while also threatening Taiwan. This statement hints that severe consequences will follow if the US does not apply pressure on Taiwan concerning the writing of a new constitution and a constitutional referendum, indicating that China will take action if that happens. It is also an attempt to reduce Chen's growing prestige and influence following his re-election.
The effect of China's military threat against Taiwan has gradually weakened in recent years and every repeated threat is dismissed by Taiwan's media, which no longer take such threats seriously. Instead, these threats have helped Chen's campaign efforts, and China therefore refrained from making further threats before this presidential election. Li's relatively indirect statement is also a step forward compared to China's stronger language in the past.
However, China's frequent and wanton criticism of Taiwan's democratic development and Chinese attempts at controlling events in Taiwan still continue, and that is regrettable. China's leaders must consider the sentiments of the international community when dealing with Taiwan. In the eyes of democratic observers, China's frequent interference in Taiwan's domestic political affairs is obviously a matter of an authoritarian country interfering in the political reform of a democratic country, and that is absurd and ridiculous in the extreme.
We also want to remind Beijing that Taiwan is not Hong Kong; it is neither a Chinese colony nor a "special administrative region." The way China dominates political developments in Hong Kong is not applicable to Taiwan. Especially in the recent presidential election, the people of Taiwan used their votes to reject the pro-China candidates, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Lien Chan (
From former president Lee Teng-hui's (李登輝) electoral victory in 1996 to Chen's re-election this year, Taiwanese voters have demonstrated their will to choose their own path. Faced with such circumstances, China should adjust its ideology and speed up political reform in order to draw the two sides closer by diminishing the differences between their political systems and their democratic progress. Beijing will only spark revulsion among the Taiwanese people by intervening in Taiwan's domestic politics and employing dirty tricks to belittle Taiwan's status in the international community.
For this reason, the Ministry of Education has strictly forbidden local universities from downgrading themselves in their exchanges with China by adding the word "Taiwan" to or deleting the word "National" from their names. We know that such self-belittling actions have been taken in order to downgrade Taiwan to a Chinese region through its word games.
China must realize that exchanges with Taiwan have to be beneficial to cross-strait relations. If these exchanges are aimed only at satisfying China, they will become meaningless.
After more than 50 years of separation, the gap between the two sides' political and social development is obvious. As close neighbors with cultural,geographical and historical ties, it's certainly necessary to narrow this gap. Friendly interaction is the primary task. China's unification propaganda and tricks will only have an effect opposite from what it intended. When will Beijing understand this simple reasoning?
Two weeks ago, Malaysian actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) raised hackles in Taiwan by posting to her 2.6 million Instagram followers that she was visiting “Taipei, China.” Yeoh’s post continues a long-standing trend of Chinese propaganda that spreads disinformation about Taiwan’s political status and geography, aimed at deceiving the world into supporting its illegitimate claims to Taiwan, which is not and has never been part of China. Taiwan must respond to this blatant act of cognitive warfare. Failure to respond merely cedes ground to China to continue its efforts to conquer Taiwan in the global consciousness to justify an invasion. Taiwan’s government
This month’s news that Taiwan ranks as Asia’s happiest place according to this year’s World Happiness Report deserves both celebration and reflection. Moving up from 31st to 27th globally and surpassing Singapore as Asia’s happiness leader is gratifying, but the true significance lies deeper than these statistics. As a society at the crossroads of Eastern tradition and Western influence, Taiwan embodies a distinctive approach to happiness worth examining more closely. The report highlights Taiwan’s exceptional habit of sharing meals — 10.1 shared meals out of 14 weekly opportunities, ranking eighth globally. This practice is not merely about food, but represents something more
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
RSS