China's Taiwan Affairs Office spokesperson, Li Weiyi (
Li is taking advantage of US Vice President Dick Cheney's visit to China to aim this very imaginative statement at the US while also threatening Taiwan. This statement hints that severe consequences will follow if the US does not apply pressure on Taiwan concerning the writing of a new constitution and a constitutional referendum, indicating that China will take action if that happens. It is also an attempt to reduce Chen's growing prestige and influence following his re-election.
The effect of China's military threat against Taiwan has gradually weakened in recent years and every repeated threat is dismissed by Taiwan's media, which no longer take such threats seriously. Instead, these threats have helped Chen's campaign efforts, and China therefore refrained from making further threats before this presidential election. Li's relatively indirect statement is also a step forward compared to China's stronger language in the past.
However, China's frequent and wanton criticism of Taiwan's democratic development and Chinese attempts at controlling events in Taiwan still continue, and that is regrettable. China's leaders must consider the sentiments of the international community when dealing with Taiwan. In the eyes of democratic observers, China's frequent interference in Taiwan's domestic political affairs is obviously a matter of an authoritarian country interfering in the political reform of a democratic country, and that is absurd and ridiculous in the extreme.
We also want to remind Beijing that Taiwan is not Hong Kong; it is neither a Chinese colony nor a "special administrative region." The way China dominates political developments in Hong Kong is not applicable to Taiwan. Especially in the recent presidential election, the people of Taiwan used their votes to reject the pro-China candidates, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Lien Chan (
From former president Lee Teng-hui's (李登輝) electoral victory in 1996 to Chen's re-election this year, Taiwanese voters have demonstrated their will to choose their own path. Faced with such circumstances, China should adjust its ideology and speed up political reform in order to draw the two sides closer by diminishing the differences between their political systems and their democratic progress. Beijing will only spark revulsion among the Taiwanese people by intervening in Taiwan's domestic politics and employing dirty tricks to belittle Taiwan's status in the international community.
For this reason, the Ministry of Education has strictly forbidden local universities from downgrading themselves in their exchanges with China by adding the word "Taiwan" to or deleting the word "National" from their names. We know that such self-belittling actions have been taken in order to downgrade Taiwan to a Chinese region through its word games.
China must realize that exchanges with Taiwan have to be beneficial to cross-strait relations. If these exchanges are aimed only at satisfying China, they will become meaningless.
After more than 50 years of separation, the gap between the two sides' political and social development is obvious. As close neighbors with cultural,geographical and historical ties, it's certainly necessary to narrow this gap. Friendly interaction is the primary task. China's unification propaganda and tricks will only have an effect opposite from what it intended. When will Beijing understand this simple reasoning?
A nation has several pillars of national defense, among them are military strength, energy and food security, and national unity. Military strength is very much on the forefront of the debate, while several recent editorials have dealt with energy security. National unity and a sense of shared purpose — especially while a powerful, hostile state is becoming increasingly menacing — are problematic, and would continue to be until the nation’s schizophrenia is properly managed. The controversy over the past few days over former navy lieutenant commander Lu Li-shih’s (呂禮詩) usage of the term “our China” during an interview about his attendance
Bo Guagua (薄瓜瓜), the son of former Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Central Committee Politburo member and former Chongqing Municipal Communist Party secretary Bo Xilai (薄熙來), used his British passport to make a low-key entry into Taiwan on a flight originating in Canada. He is set to marry the granddaughter of former political heavyweight Hsu Wen-cheng (許文政), the founder of Luodong Poh-Ai Hospital in Yilan County’s Luodong Township (羅東). Bo Xilai is a former high-ranking CCP official who was once a challenger to Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) for the chairmanship of the CCP. That makes Bo Guagua a bona fide “third-generation red”
Following the BRICS summit held in Kazan, Russia, last month, media outlets circulated familiar narratives about Russia and China’s plans to dethrone the US dollar and build a BRICS-led global order. Each summit brings renewed buzz about a BRICS cross-border payment system designed to replace the SWIFT payment system, allowing members to trade without using US dollars. Articles often highlight the appeal of this concept to BRICS members — bypassing sanctions, reducing US dollar dependence and escaping US influence. They say that, if widely adopted, the US dollar could lose its global currency status. However, none of these articles provide
US president-elect Donald Trump earlier this year accused Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) of “stealing” the US chip business. He did so to have a favorable bargaining chip in negotiations with Taiwan. During his first term from 2017 to 2021, Trump demanded that European allies increase their military budgets — especially Germany, where US troops are stationed — and that Japan and South Korea share more of the costs for stationing US troops in their countries. He demanded that rich countries not simply enjoy the “protection” the US has provided since the end of World War II, while being stingy with
RSS