The days ahead for Hong Kong's unpopular Chief Executive Tung Chee-hwa
Apart from nursing a fragile economy, Tung has to answer pressing local demands for more democracy while trying not to alarm communist leaders in Beijing worried that these aspirations pose a challenge to its authority in the territory.
ILLUSTRATION: YU SHA
Underlining Chinese fears about quick democratization, China's parliament last Tuesday re-interpreted clauses in Hong Kong's constitution giving Beijing full control over how and when the city may choose its leader and lawmakers.
But this interpretation says that while China has the power to decide if electoral reforms are needed, it is up to Tung to propose and lobby Chinese leaders for any change -- putting the Beijing-backed former shipping tycoon in an unenviable position.
"Hong Kong people will now put even more pressure on Tung," said Ivan Choy, a politics professor at City University.
"If he ignores calls for reforms and fails to submit a reform proposal, his government will face a huge challenge."
While the 66-year-old Tung can in theory initiate reforms, his hands are tied and he is at the mercy of Beijing, which is greatly unnerved by growing calls in the past year in Hong Kong for universal suffrage from as soon as 2007.
Beijing fears such ambitions could escalate into demands for independence, embolden Taiwan on a breakaway course and spawn similar grassroots movements on the mainland.
"If Tung wants to submit a reform proposal, he is likely to consult Beijing first. If he doesn't submit a proposal, then it's most likely because Beijing asked him not to," Choy said.
Any failure by Tung to make such a proposal is sure to invite more criticism against him.
a DIFFICULT TASK
Apart from being able to veto any proposed reform, China now has the authority to decide if changes are even needed.
The change comes after China amended its Constitution last month to guarantee human rights as it seeks to adapt a revolutionary communist ideology to its increasingly capitalist system.
Hong Kong was meant to embody that dichotomy: a world-class financial center that can flourish under the nurturing hand of the communist motherland.
But last year's "people power" demonstrations showed that a relatively wealthy citizenry with a per capita income of almost US$25,000 is yearning for the right to choose its leaders as well as the right to make money.
While democracy champions see China's re-interpretation as dousing hopes for universal suffrage in the near future, they have vowed to continue fighting as Beijing has not explicitly ruled out the possibility of electoral reforms from 2007.
This presents a crucial test for Tung, whose administration plunged into crisis after 500,000 people took to the streets last July in Hong Kong's biggest protest in over a decade over Beijing's demand for an anti-subversion law.
Tung was forced to shelve the planned law.
Now the reticent billionaire has a golden opportunity to shed his stolid image and try to woo popular support, said Yip Kwok-wah, head of a pro-government think tank.
"If Mr Tung wants to make a contribution to Hong Kong and have his name go down nicely in history, I would advise him to aggressively and actively work on constitutional development, so as to get the support of Beijing on the one hand and of Hong Kong people on the other," Yip said.
SOPHISTICATED GAME
The daily South China Morning Post called on Tung's government to play a more sophisticated game.
"There is little to be gained by making blanket demands for universal suffrage. A more sophisticated and flexible approach is required," the newspaper said in an editorial. "There is a need to work hard on negotiating with the central government. This means being prepared to persuade, to reassure and perhaps to compromise."
The row has already attracted a great deal of international attention.
Expressions of concern from the US, Hong Kong's second largest trading partner, have earned sharp rebukes from Beijing and even Hong Kong's government.
Politics lecturer Sonny Lo warned that Tung risked more social unrest if he failed to bridge the growing rift between Hong Kong's aspirations and Beijing's fears.
"If the gap between the government and opposition grows, it's a recipe for chaos, political unrest and tension," Lo said.
Rather than muffle calls for democracy, analysts said the re-interpretation, seen by citizens as intervention by Beijing, may even boost support for the opposition pro-democracy camp and help it win a majority in legislative elections in September.
That would further alarm Beijing and pose a tremendous challenge to Tung, as the opposition would then be in a position to veto important policies.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS