While the post-election domestic politics are entangling with electoral disputes and the election-eve shooting incident, President Chen Shui-bian (
The main interests of the international media lies in the questions of what constitutes Chen's next step, especially how he plans to reconstruct his relationship with his Beijing counterpart and how he would convince the international community his proposed new constitution in 2006 has no bearing on a unilateral change to the status quo of the Taiwan Strait.
There is a perception internationally that Chen has sent a mixed message on his approach to China. His speech on election night was considered quite conciliatory, while more recent remarks have been interpreted as taking a tougher, more defiant attitude. For example, while Chen advocates the establishment of a framework for cross-strait peace and stability, he also contends that the rise of the so-called "Taiwanese conscious-ness" has reinforced the notion of "one country on each side" of the Taiwan Strait."
What impact will such a complicated picture have on the future cross-strait relationship? What specific steps can Chen take in his second term to reach out to China and try to break the cross-strait deadlock and to reassure the world that he won't cross Beijing's "red lines" on the independence issue?
Most international observers seem to have assumed Chen's victory and his strong adherence to Taiwan's statehood poses a clear challenge to Beijing's "one China" principle and will inevitably damage cross-strait relations.
Such a stereotypical reading fails to take into account new elements of Taiwan's further democratization and Chen's proposal to build a peace framework.
First, Chen has reiterated that the essential motive for the new constitution centers more on the improvement of "good gover-nance" and bringing about political institutionalization. The idea is to hold a constitutional convention to deal with more than two-thirds of the Constitution without touching upon any changes to the name or territory of the country.
The enactment of a new constitution will have nothing to do with changing the status quo. Nor is it related to the unification or independence dispute; it involves the deepening of the nation's democratic consolidation.
Moreover, the framework for peace and stability across the Strait aims at crystallizing cross-strait interaction and institutionalized cross-strait dialogue. By making bilateral talks more predictable, the framework enables international monitoring, even facilitation. It reduces surprises and miscalculation. Isn't this what the international community has been anticipating?
A democratized Taiwan helps reinforce other new democracies in Asia. It's also produces a "light house" effect on China in terms of promoting democratic openness and liberalization.
Most importantly, a transparent and peaceful cross-strait interaction is not only beneficial to regional stability but also is in line with US interests in the Asia Pacific region.
To demonstrate his good will for cross-strait reconciliation, Chen has publicly called for both sides of the Strait to put aside political demands and replace them with a peaceful framework. If Beijing put aside its long-term precondition of the "one China" principle and Taiwan put aside the notion of "one country on each side," a common ground would be found between Taipei and Beijing. That is, peace and stability.
There is no such thing as a "red line" in future cross-strait relations. Peace and dialogue are what actually matter.
Liu Kuan-teh is a Taipei-based political commentator.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS