After a week-long mob protest in front of the Presidential Office incited by Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Lien Chan (連戰) and People First Party Chairman James Soong(宋楚瑜), it is obvious that KMT leaders and their followers do not understand or do not want democracy. Instead, they wish they were still under the authoritarian regimes of former dictators Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) and Chiang Ching-kuo(蔣經國) so they could declare the election invalid, nullify it and declare themselves the winners.
To the KMT, autocracy is always better than democracy. What a shame.
I was very surprised to learn that President Chen would be willing to sign a letter of consent to allow for an immediate recount without evidence of election fraud presented by the pan-blue camp ("Chen replies to pan-blue rally request," March 28, page 1). In a democratic country, even the president is not above the law and he must, in my opinion, obtain consent from the people who supported him because their rights should also be protected.
I hope Taiwan's High Court will not allow this to proceed. Evidence is the key to any legal challenge and procedure. And the KMT's army of lawyers, if they are competent, should not ignore the basic legal facts.
As Lien and Soong appealed their grievance to international reporters, many rally slogans were in English, such as "salvage democracy" or "democracy is dead," hoping to gain sympathy from the world media.
Fortunately, the international media and international opinion are mostly in support of Chen despite the KMT's propaganda machine.
Lien said his appeals were part of his heartfelt concern over the entire country's democratization. Surely he should know whose sacrifices gave birth to Taiwan's democracy. In the not too distant past, in an incident in Kaohsiung known as the "Formosa Incident," many DPP democratic activists were wrongfully jailed. Yet Lien, then minister of communications, and Soong, then director of the Government Information Office, never raised their voices against the unjust treatment of the activists. In fact, both Lien and Soong's contributions to Taiwan's democratic development have been rather insignificant, if not outright negative.
Lien and Soong said the crowds were out of their control during their massive rally. If so, are they fit to be the leaders if they have no control of their followers? You be the judge.
Kris Liao
California
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS