As the agitation following in the wake of the presidential election is subsiding, the pan-blue camp, which still hasn't conceded defeat, has demanded a full recount of the vote, the establishment of an independent committee to investigate the assassination attempt on President Chen Shui-bian (
Dr. Henry Lee (
It's widely believed that the outcome of a recount may be disadvantageous to the pan-blue camp and they appear to be aware of this. As a result, before Chen announced last Saturday that he agreed to a recount as soon as possible, the pan-blue camp had already changed its demand for an instant recount. It had first demanded a re-election. But after the public responded negatively to the idea, the pan-blues switched their stance by saying that a re-election was not their true intention. They said that the results of a recount would be insufficient for them to admit defeat.
The pan-blues' methods are hardly a show of their sincerity about resolving the election dispute. No wonder their credibility is being increasingly questioned by the outside world, even as they convey the impression that Taiwan is mired in disorder.
As for the questions about the national security mechanism, these are a red herring. Discussion of the matter will be meaningless if experts can prove that the shooting was not planned by Chen himself.
The reason for this is that it is only appropriate to trigger the mechanism when a president and/or a vice president have been injured. National security is paramount. In this light, whether the military and police personnel are allowed to vote should not be the question at all.
If the assassination attempt turns out to have been a fake, however, then the discussion on this matter is even more irrelevant. If this were the case, Chen and Lu would have to step down and apologize.
However, a greater worry is that both the pan-blue and the pan-green camps, knowing that the result is unlikely to be overturned, might resort to manufacturing confusing questions to mislead the public and creating social conflict in a nod to the December legislative elections. The goal would be to court middle-of-the-road voters supporting the pan-blue camp and to pave the road to power for some politicians. If partisan interests blind people's judgement, then the nation's democratic development is heading toward a cul-de-sac. The truth behind the assassination attempt, rather than an extension of political confrontation, is what the people want.
US$18.278 billion is a simple dollar figure; one that’s illustrative of the first Trump administration’s defense commitment to Taiwan. But what does Donald Trump care for money? During President Trump’s first term, the US defense department approved gross sales of “defense articles and services” to Taiwan of over US$18 billion. In September, the US-Taiwan Business Council compared Trump’s figure to the other four presidential administrations since 1993: President Clinton approved a total of US$8.702 billion from 1993 through 2000. President George W. Bush approved US$15.614 billion in eight years. This total would have been significantly greater had Taiwan’s Kuomintang-controlled Legislative Yuan been cooperative. During
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) in recent days was the focus of the media due to his role in arranging a Chinese “student” group to visit Taiwan. While his team defends the visit as friendly, civilized and apolitical, the general impression is that it was a political stunt orchestrated as part of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) propaganda, as its members were mainly young communists or university graduates who speak of a future of a unified country. While Ma lived in Taiwan almost his entire life — except during his early childhood in Hong Kong and student years in the US —
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers on Monday unilaterally passed a preliminary review of proposed amendments to the Public Officers Election and Recall Act (公職人員選罷法) in just one minute, while Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators, government officials and the media were locked out. The hasty and discourteous move — the doors of the Internal Administration Committee chamber were locked and sealed with plastic wrap before the preliminary review meeting began — was a great setback for Taiwan’s democracy. Without any legislative discussion or public witnesses, KMT Legislator Hsu Hsin-ying (徐欣瑩), the committee’s convener, began the meeting at 9am and announced passage of the
In response to a failure to understand the “good intentions” behind the use of the term “motherland,” a professor from China’s Fudan University recklessly claimed that Taiwan used to be a colony, so all it needs is a “good beating.” Such logic is risible. The Central Plains people in China were once colonized by the Mongolians, the Manchus and other foreign peoples — does that mean they also deserve a “good beating?” According to the professor, having been ruled by the Cheng Dynasty — named after its founder, Ming-loyalist Cheng Cheng-kung (鄭成功, also known as Koxinga) — as the Kingdom of Tungning,
RSS