As the agitation following in the wake of the presidential election is subsiding, the pan-blue camp, which still hasn't conceded defeat, has demanded a full recount of the vote, the establishment of an independent committee to investigate the assassination attempt on President Chen Shui-bian (
Dr. Henry Lee (
It's widely believed that the outcome of a recount may be disadvantageous to the pan-blue camp and they appear to be aware of this. As a result, before Chen announced last Saturday that he agreed to a recount as soon as possible, the pan-blue camp had already changed its demand for an instant recount. It had first demanded a re-election. But after the public responded negatively to the idea, the pan-blues switched their stance by saying that a re-election was not their true intention. They said that the results of a recount would be insufficient for them to admit defeat.
The pan-blues' methods are hardly a show of their sincerity about resolving the election dispute. No wonder their credibility is being increasingly questioned by the outside world, even as they convey the impression that Taiwan is mired in disorder.
As for the questions about the national security mechanism, these are a red herring. Discussion of the matter will be meaningless if experts can prove that the shooting was not planned by Chen himself.
The reason for this is that it is only appropriate to trigger the mechanism when a president and/or a vice president have been injured. National security is paramount. In this light, whether the military and police personnel are allowed to vote should not be the question at all.
If the assassination attempt turns out to have been a fake, however, then the discussion on this matter is even more irrelevant. If this were the case, Chen and Lu would have to step down and apologize.
However, a greater worry is that both the pan-blue and the pan-green camps, knowing that the result is unlikely to be overturned, might resort to manufacturing confusing questions to mislead the public and creating social conflict in a nod to the December legislative elections. The goal would be to court middle-of-the-road voters supporting the pan-blue camp and to pave the road to power for some politicians. If partisan interests blind people's judgement, then the nation's democratic development is heading toward a cul-de-sac. The truth behind the assassination attempt, rather than an extension of political confrontation, is what the people want.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS