After drastic swings and sways, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) defeated the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and People First Party (PFP) by a tiny margin in the election, as predicted. This hard-fought election has continued down a tortuous road for the following reasons:
First, backed up by their majority of seats in the Legislative Yuan, the KMT and PFP have often deterred policies from being implemented, created commotion and thus misled the public by painting the administration as incompetent.
Second, since the DPP is in power for the first time, its administrative performance, of course, cannot meet all expectations. Some complaints are inevitable. Besides, the corruption of individual DPP politicians may arouse discontent and mistrust.
Third, biased media influence people's opinions and obstruct grassroots identification with the government. Some sharp-tongued commentators even take delight in instigating crowds and fomenting a rebellion.
Fourth, China plays all kinds of tricks to provoke ethnic conflicts and to scheme confrontations between the government and its people. For instance, China refuses to negotiate with the Straits Exchange Foundation, plotted the "Taiwan Spy" incident, impeded the return of China-based Taiwanese businesspeople to vote and insidiously supports white-collar fugitive Chen Yu-hao's (
Fifth, China uses its diplomatic advantages to exaggerate facts or even make up a story. Beijing's diplomatic maneuver strains Taiwan's international relations and damages its reputation.
Nevertheless, it is the DPP that harvests the triumph of this election. The DPP's victory demonstrates that it is correct to use "one country on each side" as the campaign axis to resist the "one China" principle. This explains the people's grave concern for Tai-wan's sovereignty and national dignity which can not be replaced by any economic gains. In particular, former president Lee Teng-hui's (
Instead of creating social and political upheaval, the assassination attempt on the president left him and and vice president with just slight injuries. This is a blessing for Taiwan. The contention over whether the assassination attempt drew more votes to the DPP's side only has a small impact on the election. It was independent Legislator Sisy Chen's (
Unfortunately, seeing his presidential dream go up in smoke, KMT Chairman Lien Chan (
The DPP must also strive to ease the political fever from the campaign. It needs to soothe the seething resentment of the opposition party. Lien and Soong, however, should take take their defeat with calm rationalism. They must not instigate the public and create chaos to give China an excuse to invade Taiwan.
Lien and Soong have madly staked their political career on one last call. Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (
Paul Lin is a political commentator based in New York.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS