My heart sank when television broadcasts showed Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Lien Chan (連戰) leading the ballot count, one hour after voting closed. When it later emerged that President Chen Shui-bian (
While I could empathize with Lien's resentment at having lost a second presidential election, I was dismayed at his declaration that the election was unfair and should be nullified.
Time indeed is no longer on the side of Lien and People First Party Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜), who will be 72 and 66-years-old, respectively, in 2008. But I am perplexed that in their desire to assume the presi-dency, they have no reservations in casting a doubt over the democracy and integrity of the governmental organizations in Taiwan.
The entire world is sitting up and looking at the statements made by Lien and Soong. Is this how they display their so-called love for Taiwan?
Regardless of whether the pan-blue camp lost by 30,000 votes or 1 vote, the fact remains that they should respect the wishes of the majority of the voters. It should not matter even if some voters chose to vote for the pan-green camp as a result of the assassination attempt. In a democracy, every one should be respected for their choice of vote, regardless of the reason or factor.
The post-election actions of Lien and Soong would definitely have proven that both men are not suitable for the presidency. Instead of being magnanimous and gracefully accepting the fact that they are still not the choice of the majority of voters, both chose to adopt the behavior of a sore loser, out to create chaos for the country. It is ironical that Lien and Soong have called for their supporters to remain calm when it is clearly evident that their speech and actions are tailored to incite their supporters to create chaos and social unrest.
US vice president Al Gore was denied his legitimate victory in the 2000 election, even though he won the popular vote. But in Lien's case, it was clear he lost the popular vote. Yet he still shamelessly refuse to concede defeat.
The Taiwanese people have been fortunate not to have elected a man of such character to lead the nation.
Congratulations to Chen, the DPP and Taiwan in general -- a good man has indeed been elected. Sadly, the celebrations have been marred by two sore losers.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS