The Taiwan referendum observation mission of the Initiative and Referendum Institute Europe observed the first nationwide referendum in Taiwan yesterday. We have noted the legal failure of the two referendum questions, as they did not reached the turnout requirement of 50 percent of the electorate.
However, we understand that this is not the end of the history of referendums in Taiwan, but the beginning, as there are at least three essential lessons to be learnt from the country's first practical experience of referendums.
First, abolish the 50 percent turnout quorum for referen-dums. By having a turnout quorum of 50 percent the free and fair democratic process is decisively disturbed. Such a threshold does produce a motivation for boycott strategies and does not enhance the dialogue and learning process between citizens. In the end, "no" votes and people not voting make passing a proposal very difficult. It is our strong recommendation, based on worldwide experience, to abolish the 50 percent turnout quorum in the Referendum Law as soon as possible.
Second, promote offensive instead of defensive referendums. President Chen Shui-bian (
This so-called "defensive referendum" became a victim of bipartisan competition, as the referendums took place on the same day as the presidential election. In order to promote the constructive elements of direct democracy, IRI Europe strongly recommends using "offensive" referendums on separate voting days in future.
With "offensive" referendums we mean popular initiatives by the people of Taiwan and mandatory referendums on constitutional matters, as proposed by the opposition presidential candidate, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Lien Chan (
Third, secure the secrecy of the vote in referendums We have observed the conduct of yesterday's referendum with great concern. We visited several voting stations in Tainan and could see how people had to show in public if they were taking part in the referendum or not, after taking part in the election.
This is interfering with the principle of secrecy in democratic elections and referendums and should be avoided in future.
The problem could be solved by not combining an election with a referendum, as well as abolishing the 50-percent turnout requirement. But even if these requirements are upheld, it is possible to secure voting secrecy by not separating the voting procedure.
We must express our tremendous appreciation for the maturity and accuracy of yesterday's election and referendum. After the assassination attempt on Chen, the Taiwanese people stayed calm and demonstrated to the whole world that this is a free and democratic country. A country which should be assisted in all its efforts to further deepen and strengthen democracy.
Bruno Kaufmann is president of the Initiative and Referendum Institute Europe.
The article was first printed in the Asia Times Online and is republished with permission, since Asia Times Online published it on the 21st.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS