The presidential election has finally come to an end. President Chen Shui-bian (
As soon as his new term begins, Chen will be faced with many stern challenges.
Four years after the 2000 defeat of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) after 50 years in power and the nation's first transfer of political power, to the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), Chen and Vice President Annette Lu (
The nation's party structure has experienced a fundamental change. Although the KMT and its allies still have a majority in the legislature, it has already been established that their supporters are in the minority in Taiwanese society.
The people of Taiwan have chosen reform and progress and closed the door on the KMT, a party with an authoritarian and corrupt past.
The new mainstream of Taiwanese society has been firmly established.
During the presidential election campaign, society has once again suffered due to the intense campaign process and the tense election situation, the sharp confrontation between the pan-blue and pan-green camps resulting from their partisan attitudes, excessive social mobilization and the broadening gap between different ethnic groups.
After the passion fades, it is imperative that society quickly return to normal.
The assassination attempt on the president and vice president on the eve of the election, which caught the attention of the international community, cast a shadow of violence over the election and added a black page to the history of democratic development in Taiwan. The attack shows that there still are people who do not understand Taiwanese democracy. They elevated a political election to the status of confrontation between enemies and adopted the strongest of methods to influence the outcome of the presidential election. Regardless of the motives behind the assassination attempt, the smooth and peaceful counting of votes has allowed the people of Taiwan to demonstrate to the international community that the Taiwanese democracy is vital and forceful.
Our political leaders, however, still lack sufficient maturity.
Democracy cannot please everyone. Half of Taiwan's population will be happy with this result, while the other half will be disappointed. However, the people's choice has been established, and everyone should respect the result. Lien announced that there were many doubtful aspects to the election process, that it was an unfair election and that he therefore will demand that it be invalidated. The confrontation of the election campaign will thus continue after election day, and the divisions in Taiwan remain as serious as ever.
Taiwan remain as serious as ever. Although Chen was re-elected by a majority, he must remain humble, because close to half the people of Taiwan do not support him.
This is an improvement on the minority position he has been in over the past four years, but the road ahead is full of political obstacles.
The first challenge of Chen's second term will be to set an example by actively pushing for reconciliation between the political parties, while also promoting ethnic harmony and the resolution of social conflict.
The second challenge facing Chen on the domestic front will be the year-end legislative elections. Soon after the presidential election, the major political parties will start nominating their legislative candidates.
This is something that will involve both the distribution of power within and the interaction between the different parties.
For example, internal KMT succession issues, as well as the question of whether the KMT and the PFP should merge or cooperate, will come to the surface during the legislative nomination process.
More important, the result of the year-end legislative elections will have a direct impact on future presidential power and policy implementation.
The biggest obstacle to Chen and his policy implementation over the past four years has been his inability to control a legislative majority.
This has been a source of much friction for the minority government when implementing policy. Because it still seems unlikely that the year-end legislative elections will produce a single majority party, the president will -- despite hoping to take advantage of a "coat-tail effect" to lead his own party to a legislative majority -- have to work hard to form a majority coalition in the new legislature in order to facilitate policy implementation and to avoid experiencing the problems faced by the minority government over the past four years. The question of whether the new government to be formed on May 20 will become the first true coalition government in the history of Taiwan will be a first test of the president's ability to control a legislative majority following the year-end legislative elections.
The initiation of constitutional and political reform will be another major challenge facing Chen. The issues of halving the number of legislative seats and introducing a single-district, two-ballot electoral system are closely related to the outcome of the year-end legislative elections.
So is the question of the implementation of Chen's campaign proposals -- a presidential system separating the three powers, a re-delineation of central and local government responsibilities and the time schedule for a new constitution, writing it in 2006 and implementing it in 2008.
The first diplomatic challenge of Chen's new presidency will be to mend the nation's relations with the US. Controversies surrounding the referendum have over the past few months put Taiwan-US ties in an unprecedented situation. Chen's first task will be to rebuild fundamental mutual trust between Taiwan and the US, pledge to maintain stability in the Taiwan Strait and win Washington's trust that Taiwan will not take the initiative to change the status quo or destroy the US' national interests in the region.
He will have to do all this in the shortest time possible.
The choice of the nation's new representative to the US and negotiations on weapons procurement are also related to these tasks, as it will influence the mending of Taiwan-US relations.
Next, once a new government has been formed, it must take a more active approach to the cross-strait relationship. From economic negotiations (such as opening up direct links) to political discussions (such as establishing a "peace and stability" framework for cross-strait interaction), Taiwan's leader must respond swiftly to changes at home and abroad.
Faced with a rising Taiwanese awareness, the question of whether the Beijing government will adopt a more flexible or a harsher attitude will also influence the new president's stance when dealing with the cross-strait relationship.
The survival of Taiwan has always depended on economic development. The Taiwanese people have been dissatisfied with the poor economic performance during the past four years of DPP rule.
In the next four years, the new government will still have to face many challenges to its economic policies. These challenges include reducing the overall unemployment rate, improving finances and balancing the budget, adjusting industrial policy, continued financial reform, adjustment of agricultural policy following Taiwan's entry into the World Trade Organization and enhancing international competitiveness. All of these are issues that the president has to face. In addition, it is impossible to completely separate cross-strait relations from Taiwan's economic development.
The direction of the new government's China policy will certainly have a significant impact on the future economic development of Taiwan.
Before the election, many political observers, both at home and abroad, viewed the election as a historical watershed in Taiwan's political development and cross-strait interactions.
The Taiwanese people have already made their choice, firmly establishing mainstream opinion. At this crucial moment in Taiwan's history, how can Chen, backed by the support of a majority of the Taiwanese people, lead Taiwan into a brighter future?
The challenge is just beginning.
Wang Yeh-lih is a professor of political science at Tunghai University.
Translated by Jackie Lin, Eddy Chang and Perry Svensson
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS