The vernal equinox, the first day of spring, falls on March 20 this year. The vernal equinox of this year will be the day of Taiwan's destiny. Today's election will decide not just who will be the president, or whether the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) or the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)-People First Party (PFP) alliance will rule the next four years, the outcome will also determine Taiwan's destiny.
After enduring nearly four decades of White Terror under martial law, Taiwan finally evolved into a democracy in the late 1980s. Many factors contributed to this development. The US recognized the PRC and cut off diplomatic relations with the Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan in 1979. Taiwan became increasingly isolated from the international community. With industrialization, native Taiwanese began to gain wealth and leverage over the government. The lower ranks of the military and bureaucracy and even the KMT itself were increasingly filled with native Taiwanese. The US government, particularly the Congress, became critical of the authoritarian practices of the KMT government, such as the violation of civil rights as exhibited in the persecution of the "Kaohsiung Eight."
When the tang wai (outside the party) movement of political dissidents, which demanded a right to participate in the political process, became irresistible, then-president Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) reluctantly acquiesced in the emergence of the DPP political opposition.
Taiwan's democratization took place not because the autocratic government suddenly became enlightened, but in spite of the KMT's long years of resistance to democratic reform. The ascendancy of Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) to the presidency and his reform efforts during his 12 years in office were instrumental in advancing the pro-cess of democratization. However, many KMT politicians and officials who were born in China have never been able to shed their anti-democratic instincts or their basic allegiance to the dream of a unified China.
This is why KMT Chairman Lien Chan (連戰) and PFP Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜) oppose the referendum, even though it represents a legitimate deepening of Taiwan's democracy and it will enable the people to declare to the whole world their desire to protect Taiwan's sovereignty and to peacefully coexist with the PRC.
The pan-blue alliance has never gracefully accepted defeat in the 2000 election. Instead of acting as a loyal opposition of a normal democracy, the opposition parties have obstructed every substantive reform proposal the government has presented, thus paralyzing the government time and again. The KMT-PFP alliance then used the pro-China electronic and print media to blame the stalemate on the government's ineptitude.
The pan-blue alliance is adept in making use of the freedom of speech to scuttle democratic institutions but it has no respect for the freedom of speech. When the Special Report series of VCDs criticizing certain KMT-PFP politicians was released several months ago, Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) ordered them confiscated in his city, in clear violation of the Constitution.
If Lien wins the presidency, anti-democratic repression is likely to raise its ugly head and Taiwan's hard-won freedom will begin to erode.
Even more worrisome is what a Lien-Soong victory will do to Taiwan's future status. Both men have professed their goal of eventual unification with China. Lien, the self-proclaimed 100 percent pure Chinese, has pledged to travel to Beijing on a mission of peace as soon as he is elected. The PRC will not permit his pilgrimage to Beijing as the president of the ROC. Lien must go there as the governor of the Taiwan Province of the PRC. The trip will be tantamount to surrender of sovereignty and Taiwan's acceptance of Bei-jing's claim that it is part of the PRC.
A Lien government could then implement the direct links, promote integration of Taiwan's economy with that of China, including faster outflow of capital, technology and technical and management manpower to China, and encourage Chinese investment in Taiwan's industry, real estate and media. Taiwan's gate can also be opened wide to infiltration by China's intelligence agents, special operations troops and People's Liberation Army (PLA) officers. The size of Taiwan's military can be reduced steadily until its capacity to resist PRC aggression becomes insignificant. The pro-China media can be encouraged to propagate unification ideology. Sometime before 2008 Taiwan may be rendered so weak that Lien would be able to deliver it peacefully into the PLA's grasp.
The above scenario is quite plausible, given the Lien-Soong team's "one China" complex. To them, Taiwan is essentially a barbarian region destined to be ruled by the central authority of the Middle Kingdom. Their allegiance is to China. Kneeling and kissing Taiwan's earth one week before election day is eye-catching theater. But the love of Taiwan the gesture was supposed to demonstrate appeared insincere in view of the pair's anti-democratic and anti-Taiwanization deeds while in power.
Taiwan's 400-year-old history is an incessant struggle for liberty against alien rulers. Although those struggles were valiant, Taiwan's forebears never had a realistic chance to build an independent nation, even though the island was an independent kingdom from 1662 to 1683, and for several months in 1895 under the banner of the Taiwan Democratic Republic. Post-World War II developments made it possible for Taiwan to become a de facto independent state. This status quo can be maintained, but only if the people commit themselves to a democratic future and show their willingness to strive hard to keep their sovereignty and democracy.
All Taiwanese who cherish liberty, security and dignity must vote for the right team today. The freedom of their children and grandchildren depends on the right choice. The election itself is a momentous referendum on Taiwan's destiny. The vernal equinox is the first day of spring. It could symbolize the dawn of a bright new age for Ilha Formosa.
Li Thian-hok is a freelance commentator based in Pennsylvania.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS