The vernal equinox, the first day of spring, falls on March 20 this year. The vernal equinox of this year will be the day of Taiwan's destiny. Today's election will decide not just who will be the president, or whether the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) or the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)-People First Party (PFP) alliance will rule the next four years, the outcome will also determine Taiwan's destiny.
After enduring nearly four decades of White Terror under martial law, Taiwan finally evolved into a democracy in the late 1980s. Many factors contributed to this development. The US recognized the PRC and cut off diplomatic relations with the Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan in 1979. Taiwan became increasingly isolated from the international community. With industrialization, native Taiwanese began to gain wealth and leverage over the government. The lower ranks of the military and bureaucracy and even the KMT itself were increasingly filled with native Taiwanese. The US government, particularly the Congress, became critical of the authoritarian practices of the KMT government, such as the violation of civil rights as exhibited in the persecution of the "Kaohsiung Eight."
When the tang wai (outside the party) movement of political dissidents, which demanded a right to participate in the political process, became irresistible, then-president Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) reluctantly acquiesced in the emergence of the DPP political opposition.
Taiwan's democratization took place not because the autocratic government suddenly became enlightened, but in spite of the KMT's long years of resistance to democratic reform. The ascendancy of Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) to the presidency and his reform efforts during his 12 years in office were instrumental in advancing the pro-cess of democratization. However, many KMT politicians and officials who were born in China have never been able to shed their anti-democratic instincts or their basic allegiance to the dream of a unified China.
This is why KMT Chairman Lien Chan (連戰) and PFP Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜) oppose the referendum, even though it represents a legitimate deepening of Taiwan's democracy and it will enable the people to declare to the whole world their desire to protect Taiwan's sovereignty and to peacefully coexist with the PRC.
The pan-blue alliance has never gracefully accepted defeat in the 2000 election. Instead of acting as a loyal opposition of a normal democracy, the opposition parties have obstructed every substantive reform proposal the government has presented, thus paralyzing the government time and again. The KMT-PFP alliance then used the pro-China electronic and print media to blame the stalemate on the government's ineptitude.
The pan-blue alliance is adept in making use of the freedom of speech to scuttle democratic institutions but it has no respect for the freedom of speech. When the Special Report series of VCDs criticizing certain KMT-PFP politicians was released several months ago, Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) ordered them confiscated in his city, in clear violation of the Constitution.
If Lien wins the presidency, anti-democratic repression is likely to raise its ugly head and Taiwan's hard-won freedom will begin to erode.
Even more worrisome is what a Lien-Soong victory will do to Taiwan's future status. Both men have professed their goal of eventual unification with China. Lien, the self-proclaimed 100 percent pure Chinese, has pledged to travel to Beijing on a mission of peace as soon as he is elected. The PRC will not permit his pilgrimage to Beijing as the president of the ROC. Lien must go there as the governor of the Taiwan Province of the PRC. The trip will be tantamount to surrender of sovereignty and Taiwan's acceptance of Bei-jing's claim that it is part of the PRC.
A Lien government could then implement the direct links, promote integration of Taiwan's economy with that of China, including faster outflow of capital, technology and technical and management manpower to China, and encourage Chinese investment in Taiwan's industry, real estate and media. Taiwan's gate can also be opened wide to infiltration by China's intelligence agents, special operations troops and People's Liberation Army (PLA) officers. The size of Taiwan's military can be reduced steadily until its capacity to resist PRC aggression becomes insignificant. The pro-China media can be encouraged to propagate unification ideology. Sometime before 2008 Taiwan may be rendered so weak that Lien would be able to deliver it peacefully into the PLA's grasp.
The above scenario is quite plausible, given the Lien-Soong team's "one China" complex. To them, Taiwan is essentially a barbarian region destined to be ruled by the central authority of the Middle Kingdom. Their allegiance is to China. Kneeling and kissing Taiwan's earth one week before election day is eye-catching theater. But the love of Taiwan the gesture was supposed to demonstrate appeared insincere in view of the pair's anti-democratic and anti-Taiwanization deeds while in power.
Taiwan's 400-year-old history is an incessant struggle for liberty against alien rulers. Although those struggles were valiant, Taiwan's forebears never had a realistic chance to build an independent nation, even though the island was an independent kingdom from 1662 to 1683, and for several months in 1895 under the banner of the Taiwan Democratic Republic. Post-World War II developments made it possible for Taiwan to become a de facto independent state. This status quo can be maintained, but only if the people commit themselves to a democratic future and show their willingness to strive hard to keep their sovereignty and democracy.
All Taiwanese who cherish liberty, security and dignity must vote for the right team today. The freedom of their children and grandchildren depends on the right choice. The election itself is a momentous referendum on Taiwan's destiny. The vernal equinox is the first day of spring. It could symbolize the dawn of a bright new age for Ilha Formosa.
Li Thian-hok is a freelance commentator based in Pennsylvania.
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS