Qummergal grimaced as she bared her face to a camera for the first time. But when she saw her portrait, she giggled with delight. "I can't believe it's me," she said. "Look at me. It's wonderful!"
Qummergal was registering to vote in Afghanistan's first elections since the advent of war 25 years ago. "My son told me to come here," she explained. "When the time comes to choose a new king, he will tell me what to do."
Qummergal, whose husband was killed by the Taliban four years ago, was more clued up than most women registering at Khalilullah Khalili high school in Kabul. Several had no idea why they were there. And all said they would vote for whomever their husbands or sons told them to.
The men queuing outside another schoolroom were a little better informed. "This is a happy day for me, I am looking forward to voting for peace," said Ahmed Shah, adding that he would not permit his wife to vote.
But Mohammed Momen, a stern figure with a black turban and matching beard, was perhaps more representative. "I've come to get a registration card and maybe some food," he said.
Midway through Afghanistan's voter registration process, these were typical scenes for Max Campos, a UN worker overseeing proceedings. "People are disappointed when we tell them we're not giving anything away. Some people come here expecting some food," he said. "There's very little understanding of what the process is.
"Things we take for granted, like women's rights and political parties, many Afghans have never heard of."
In the post-Sept. 11 world, Afghanistan's presidential and parliamentary elections are a crucial milestone, and not only for Afghans. They are intended to show the feasibility of democracy in a broken society, vindicating the US policy of toppling unsavory regimes without colonizing the mess they leave behind.
The stakes are high, but the UN's progress is slow. It began registering voters on Dec. 1, anticipating elections in September. From the outset, this was a formidable task. Most Afghans were not even born at the time of the country's last census, making the UN's target of 10.5 million voters a very rough estimate.
Throughout, the UN has struggled for cash, and still needs US$27 million to complete registration. "Money is a major problem," said Reg Austen, the UN's chief electoral officer. "We started at least two months late because we couldn't raise the funds we needed, and we still can't."
Worse, a Taliban resurgence has put most of southern Afghanistan out of bounds to UN staff; a French UN worker was murdered by the group's assassins in November. A subsequent plan to use mosques as registration and polling stations was shelved after the Taliban threatened to kill mullahs cooperating with the plan.
"Even in Kabul, we're effectively under a 24-hour curfew. From an election point of view, it's a complete disaster," said Austen.
"People will say, you're stupid to try holding an election in a country still half at war. But I'm afraid that's the situation we're in."
Registration is far behind schedule, with about 1 million voters officially registered in the seven biggest towns. The real figure could be much lower because many people are thought to have registered more than once.
And, to the UN's despair, the election date has been brought forward. In January President Hamid Karzai announced polls would be held in June. There was just one reason for the change, according to diplomats in Kabul: pressure from the US. With an election of his own due in November and Iraq in flames, US President George W. Bush needs a positive foreign policy to sell to US voters.
"Even the Americans recognize that the elections are being rushed," a European diplomat said. "But that's too bad: Bush wants elections in June."
To accelerate voter registration -- and to avoid sending staff into the violent south -- the UN plans to train 35,000 Afghans as electoral officers. From May 1 these officers will be charged with registering the 8.5 million eligible voters estimated to be living outside Afghanistan's main towns -- in just three weeks. "It's still possible," Austen said. "If each site registers 60 people a day, we'll do it."
But the 35,000 workers and 4,200 registration sites are still to be found. Even then, the 8.5 million Afghans must be persuaded to register. Or rather, half that number -- and their wives. In rural and, especially, traditional southern Afghanistan, women are rarely permitted to leave their homes. Even in urban areas, women represent less than a quarter of the people registered so far.
"It's a matter of selling the process, you've got to tell people that if they won't let their wives vote, men in other parts of the country will, and then they'll miss out," said Masood Karokhail, a civil education officer for Swiss Peace, a non-governmental organization.
Karzai is expected to win the presidential elections with ease, and diplomats believe they can be held on time, though with a limited number of voters. But, with no political parties yet registered, or constituencies defined, parliamentary election cannot, according to Austen.
Karzai would then be left ruling by decree -- a prospect some of Afghanistan's other powerbrokers find troubling.
Two years after the fall of the Taliban, most of Afghanistan is ruled by warlords with little regard for Karzai's government in Kabul. They have little to gain from a unified, democratic and centrally governed Afghanistan.
"If anyone thinks we are ready for elections, he's lying," said General Daoud Khan, the powerful commander of northern Kunduz. "But if we must have elections, those people in the south shouldn't be allowed to vote."
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
As an American living in Taiwan, I have to confess how impressed I have been over the years by the Chinese Communist Party’s wholehearted embrace of high-speed rail and electric vehicles, and this at a time when my own democratic country has chosen a leader openly committed to doing everything in his power to put obstacles in the way of sustainable energy across the board — and democracy to boot. It really does make me wonder: “Are those of us right who hold that democracy is the right way to go?” Has Taiwan made the wrong choice? Many in China obviously
About 6.1 million couples tied the knot last year, down from 7.28 million in 2023 — a drop of more than 20 percent, data from the Chinese Ministry of Civil Affairs showed. That is more serious than the precipitous drop of 12.2 percent in 2020, the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. As the saying goes, a single leaf reveals an entire autumn. The decline in marriages reveals problems in China’s economic development, painting a dismal picture of the nation’s future. A giant question mark hangs over economic data that Beijing releases due to a lack of clarity, freedom of the press
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
RSS