While some people around the world were concerned about whether China would react in a military way to the peace referendum on March 20, most overlooked the fact that Taiwan would also be holding a peaceful presidential election -- and a referendum on the future of Asian democracy.
To look on the bright -- and constructive -- side, if the election and referendum proceed in a smooth and orderly way, without sparking significant cross-strait tensions, Taiwan could be in the vanguard of building a new Asian democracy. This notion of "new Asian democracy," characterized by people's power to achieve a deepening of democracy through institutionalized mechanisms, will have unprecedented effects on major nations in the region.
Asia has become a focus of democracy theorists' attention in recent years because of its democratic consolidation. Both South Korea and Taiwan accomplished the first peaceful transfers of political power in their history. Hong Kong residents, after experimenting with China's formula of "one country, two systems" for some years, took to the streets in protest of Beijing's infringing on their human rights.
The Asian community captured worldwide attention for its potential to internalize democratic principles in people's daily lives.
Good news does not last long. In three global waves of democratization, many countries -- including some in Asia -- have completed transfers of political power but are either still mired in trouble, or old authoritarian conservative political forces have made a comeback because the people could not put up with the pain of reforms.
Cronyism still plays a role in some Southeast Asia democracies, which led to the resignation of presidents in the Philippines and Indonesia. Former South Korean president Kim Dae-jung's term was marred by his involvement with bribery for peace negotiations with the North. Kim's successor, Roh Moo-hyun, has been having a hard time dealing with domestic forces and was impeached by parliament yesterday.
Overall, Asian democracy seemed to have lost its historical momentum at the turn of the new century.
But the political landscape in Asia will be shaped by a new round of elections this year, which will open another gateway for building Asian democracy. Taiwan's election will be followed by congressional elections in Malaysia and South Korea, and presidential elections in the Philippines and Indonesia this summer. Taiwan will have legislative elections before the end of this year. Thailand may have parliamentary elections early next year.
If President Chen Shui-bian (
Since Chen's challenger -- Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Lien Chan (
Moreover, Chen's referendum will bring about further democratization in Asian countries.
Indonesia and South Korea have both expressed interest in introducing referendums to solve policy and political disputes. Hence, Taiwan's implementation of the referendum mechanism could help establish an example for its Asian allies.
What distinguishes Taiwan from China is this nation's embrace of and adherence to democracy. A "peaceful framework for cross-strait stability and interaction," embedded in the second referendum question, will demonstrate Taiwan's desire to solve cross-strait differences through democratic means.
In this regard, the peace referendum should be valued by the entire Asian community.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS