Letter of the law
Before people make -- or report -- accusations ("Nobel Peace Prize winner facing fine," Mar. 9, Page 1), perhaps they should actually read the relevant laws. The fact that a legislator says something is illegal doesn't make it so.
Article 96 of the Presidential and Vice Presidential Election and Recall Law (總統副總統選舉罷免法) -- which is separate from the Public Officials Election and Recall Law (公職人員選罷法) -- merely lays down punishments for various violations. It prescribes fines for violations of Article 50, which states that "political parties or any person may not ... (paragraph 4) invite foreign or mainland nationals to participate in activities listed in Article 43," which include openly campaigning.
This is the only mention of this issue in the law; therefore, only the organizers of the campaign activities in question can be said to violate the law, if indeed they have "invited" a foreign or Chinese national. The visitor, on the other hand, bears no legal responsibility, nor do any other agencies connected with his or her visit. Furthermore, this is a clear case of selective punishment, because the Chinese National Party (KMT) has not been fined for its using the invitation of Nobel Laureate Lawrence Klein for campaign purposes ("Klein joins KMT think tank," Mar. 2, page 3).
However, simply handing out more fines will not improve the situation, because this restriction almost certainly violates Article 11 of the Constitution (freedom of speech), as well as the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. It is a remnant of authoritarianism which should be abolished. Unless any harm is caused to others, the voters' judgment of the appropriateness of campaign activities is the only one that counts.
Bo Tedards
Taipei
Peace, freedom are good
The record turnout of participants in the 228 Hand-in-Hand Rally last week established a milestone in Taiwan's democratic movement.
People from all walks of life joined together on this historic day of sorrow and turned it into a day of hope for peace and freedom in the future. The rally brought the people together, definitively and positively demonstrating the common moral principles shared among them to stand for and protect their beloved homeland called Taiwan.
Through the rally, the people have not only demonstrated their resolve to safeguard the country's democratic values, but also made a plea to the international community to lend its support to Taiwan's pursuit of long-lasting peace and freedom. As it turns out, the free world responded positively to their plea.
The solidarity among the people has been greatly solidified by the rally, which will definitely help them in their pursuit of a free and democratic society. Remember: united we stand; divided we fall.
Ching Li
Changhua
Just say no to China
On March 20, much more will be at stake in the election than whether the voters have more confidence in the ability of one candidate over the other to manage the economy and preserve peace. At stake is Taiwan's status as a sovereign nation.
If the people re-elect President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), the international community, and most particularly the US, will receive a clear and unambiguous message that Taiwan wishes to remain a sovereign and independent state, and that its people reject the idea of eventually falling victim to Chinese tyranny. The US and the rest of the world will then adjust their view of Taiwan and will accommodate it as a sovereign state.
The US State Department seems already prepared for this shift, and President George W. Bush's conservative base of support is already demanding it. The only minor stumbling block is China's "assistance" with the North Korean problem, but Washington's illusions on that point are quickly vanishing.
If, however, KMT Chairman Lien Chan (連戰) is elected president, then the US is likely to view that as a message that the people intend to eventually fall under Chinese sovereignty.
Consequently, the ballots for the election could appropriately be rewritten to: "Do you wish to be ruled by China? If YES, then vote for Lien, if NO, then vote for Chen.
Daniel McCarthy
Salt Lake City, Utah
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS