Letter of the law
Before people make -- or report -- accusations ("Nobel Peace Prize winner facing fine," Mar. 9, Page 1), perhaps they should actually read the relevant laws. The fact that a legislator says something is illegal doesn't make it so.
Article 96 of the Presidential and Vice Presidential Election and Recall Law (總統副總統選舉罷免法) -- which is separate from the Public Officials Election and Recall Law (公職人員選罷法) -- merely lays down punishments for various violations. It prescribes fines for violations of Article 50, which states that "political parties or any person may not ... (paragraph 4) invite foreign or mainland nationals to participate in activities listed in Article 43," which include openly campaigning.
This is the only mention of this issue in the law; therefore, only the organizers of the campaign activities in question can be said to violate the law, if indeed they have "invited" a foreign or Chinese national. The visitor, on the other hand, bears no legal responsibility, nor do any other agencies connected with his or her visit. Furthermore, this is a clear case of selective punishment, because the Chinese National Party (KMT) has not been fined for its using the invitation of Nobel Laureate Lawrence Klein for campaign purposes ("Klein joins KMT think tank," Mar. 2, page 3).
However, simply handing out more fines will not improve the situation, because this restriction almost certainly violates Article 11 of the Constitution (freedom of speech), as well as the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. It is a remnant of authoritarianism which should be abolished. Unless any harm is caused to others, the voters' judgment of the appropriateness of campaign activities is the only one that counts.
Bo Tedards
Taipei
Peace, freedom are good
The record turnout of participants in the 228 Hand-in-Hand Rally last week established a milestone in Taiwan's democratic movement.
People from all walks of life joined together on this historic day of sorrow and turned it into a day of hope for peace and freedom in the future. The rally brought the people together, definitively and positively demonstrating the common moral principles shared among them to stand for and protect their beloved homeland called Taiwan.
Through the rally, the people have not only demonstrated their resolve to safeguard the country's democratic values, but also made a plea to the international community to lend its support to Taiwan's pursuit of long-lasting peace and freedom. As it turns out, the free world responded positively to their plea.
The solidarity among the people has been greatly solidified by the rally, which will definitely help them in their pursuit of a free and democratic society. Remember: united we stand; divided we fall.
Ching Li
Changhua
Just say no to China
On March 20, much more will be at stake in the election than whether the voters have more confidence in the ability of one candidate over the other to manage the economy and preserve peace. At stake is Taiwan's status as a sovereign nation.
If the people re-elect President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), the international community, and most particularly the US, will receive a clear and unambiguous message that Taiwan wishes to remain a sovereign and independent state, and that its people reject the idea of eventually falling victim to Chinese tyranny. The US and the rest of the world will then adjust their view of Taiwan and will accommodate it as a sovereign state.
The US State Department seems already prepared for this shift, and President George W. Bush's conservative base of support is already demanding it. The only minor stumbling block is China's "assistance" with the North Korean problem, but Washington's illusions on that point are quickly vanishing.
If, however, KMT Chairman Lien Chan (連戰) is elected president, then the US is likely to view that as a message that the people intend to eventually fall under Chinese sovereignty.
Consequently, the ballots for the election could appropriately be rewritten to: "Do you wish to be ruled by China? If YES, then vote for Lien, if NO, then vote for Chen.
Daniel McCarthy
Salt Lake City, Utah
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS