The 228 Hand-in-Hand Rally, with 2 million people taking to the streets, set a record hard to surpass in the history of Taiwan's democratic development. What role do the 2 million participants of the rally play in the presidential election? What impact do they have? Well, we'll know the answer on March 20.
Seeing the crowds that day, the pan-blue camp could not be more worried. Although it tried to comfort itself by saying that "polls are of reference value only," it immediately emulated the pan-green camp by planning to hold a nationwide march tomorrow.
The pan-blue camp first branded the march as an "anti-corruption parade." Later, it changed the official slogan to "change the president and salvage Taiwan." Obviously, the camp has felt the pressure presented by the 228 rally and also needs to mobilize its supporters to get out of the predicament.
People First Party (PFP) Chairman James Soong (
However, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the PFP themselves represent the force most connected with gangsters and business interests. Their anti-corruption move is tantamount to exposing their own wrongdoings for public scrutiny and ridicule. That's why they quickly changed their slogan to "change the president and salvage Taiwan."
With their motives behind altering the theme of the activity so obvious, PFP Legislator Lee Yong-ping (
Is the anti-corruption theme really not broad enough? It actually served as one of the major campaign themes for the DPP in the 2000 presidential election. It was also the reason behind Academia Sinica President Lee Yuan-tseh's (李遠哲) stepping forward to stump for then-candidate Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁).
Even many KMT figures admitted that the party has paid the price for its corruption with the loss of power. So the statement that the anti-corruption theme is not broad enough does not stand.
A few days ago, Taiwan Pineapple Group vice-chairman Huang Tsung-hung (
The reason why the human-chain rally could attract so many people is because the appeal of "protecting Taiwan hand-in-hand" touched the hearts of the Taiwanese people. Marketing theories contend that the most successful advertisements usually awaken the deepest desires of human beings. The success of the hand-in-hand rally lies in its successful eliciting of the deepest aspirations of the Taiwanese people.
Then, how about the slogan of "change the president and salvage Taiwan?" Burdened with the history of corruption, the KMT-PFP alliance can only mobilize those "reunification fundamentalists" to join in the march.
Let's wait and see how large a supporting base the pan-blue camp has even with its most thorough and effective mobilization. Let's see whether "changing the president" makes a more appealing appeal than "protecting Taiwan hand-in-hand." The 313 march provides the most stringent test for the pan-blue camp.
Chin Heng-wei is editor in chief of Contemporary Monthly magazine.
Translated by Jennie Shih
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS