Christine Mak never cared much for politics in money-mad Hong Kong. At least, not until China's communist government decided to warn Hong Kong people that pressing too hard for democracy was unpatriotic.
Mak has become increasingly irritated with Beijing and Hong Kong's pro-China politicians since they launched a strident campaign to douse demands for more voting rights.
"We are not dogs. Just because you throw us some biscuits, it does not mean we will eat and lick your boots," said Mak, a fund manager in her 30s.
Now she intends to vote for a democrat in Hong Kong's legislative elections in September.
In the latest salvo in the war of words over democracy in Hong Kong, China's official media and Beijing's supporters in the city have attacked pro-democracy legislators, some by name, as unfit to be trusted with political power and unpatriotic.
They have also reminded Hong Kong of the economic favors Beijing has bestowed on it since it returned to Chinese rule in 1997 and warned that the city would suffer if unsuitable individuals were voted in.
But there are fears the row, which has included personal attacks on pro-democracy politicians, could trigger more public anger which could in turn force an even stronger response from China's leaders.
"We are not afraid, we want democracy. The harsher Beijing is, the more we will demand," said office worker Daniel Wong.
The danger for Hong Kong is that the escalating confrontation rattles confidence in one of the world's main financial centers.
"If this situation prolongs, it will not be good. It could lead to large demonstrations and that may provoke an even stronger reaction from Beijing," said a money market dealer.
The big question for China is how many voters think like Mak?
Landslide for democrats?
Beijing's reprimands and warnings stem from a simple fear: that the leaders chosen by Hong Kong people will challenge its power.
"It is most worried that those elected will challenge its authority, support dissidents on the mainland, and Taiwan independence," said pollster and politics lecturer Timothy Wong of Hong Kong's Chinese University.
"Beijing wants Hong Kong people to set its mind at ease and promise not to deviate from these important principles before it will even talk about political reforms."
But the strategy is not working, if polls are to be believed. A survey of 1,237 people late last month by the independent Ming Pao newspaper showed 52 percent would vote for democracy candidates, while 25 percent would back pro-China parties.
A third of those polled said their impression of the central government had been damaged by the recent rhetoric from Beijing.
"If [Hong Kong] votes tomorrow, the democrats will have a landslide victory," Wong said.
If the democrats secure more than half of the 60 legislative seats, they will wield enough power for the first time to veto government policies and that could bring the China-backed administration to its knees.
Recession, protests
Like many others in the former British colony, Mak embraced Chinese rule and the economic perks that Beijing lavished on the city after the 1997 handover when it became embroiled in one economic recession after another.
But protests last year highlighted deep discontent with the China-backed administration, whose policies have been blamed for the city's financial troubles.
Opposition politicians, who are now in a minority and have no real power, have called for a rapid move to full direct elections by 2007, the earliest that the Constitution would allow.
Hong Kong was promised a high degree of autonomy under a "one country, two systems" agreement with Britain before the city was handed back to China.
But analysts say China, always wary of any threat to social stability, is unlikely to allow full democracy in Hong Kong and risk similar demands on the mainland.
China has underwritten confidence in Hong Kong as a world financial hub but there are signs the political wrangle is beginning to have an impact on the financial markets.
The Hong Kong dollar weakened slightly last Monday, which one dealer attributed partly to a fresh comment from a Chinese expert, who singled out a Hong Kong rights group as unpatriotic.
The group the expert named was the Hong Kong Alliance in Support of the Patriotic Democratic Movement in China, formed after the 1989 Tiananmen Square democracy protests in Beijing.
But some Hong Kong people say supporting pro-China candidates might be best for the city in the long run.
"It will not do to lock horns so aggressively with Beijing. It will only encourage it to throw out all our plans and we will be left with nothing. I will probably vote for pro-business candidates who have Beijing's ears," said executive Candy Lo.
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed
RSS