Christine Mak never cared much for politics in money-mad Hong Kong. At least, not until China's communist government decided to warn Hong Kong people that pressing too hard for democracy was unpatriotic.
Mak has become increasingly irritated with Beijing and Hong Kong's pro-China politicians since they launched a strident campaign to douse demands for more voting rights.
"We are not dogs. Just because you throw us some biscuits, it does not mean we will eat and lick your boots," said Mak, a fund manager in her 30s.
Now she intends to vote for a democrat in Hong Kong's legislative elections in September.
In the latest salvo in the war of words over democracy in Hong Kong, China's official media and Beijing's supporters in the city have attacked pro-democracy legislators, some by name, as unfit to be trusted with political power and unpatriotic.
They have also reminded Hong Kong of the economic favors Beijing has bestowed on it since it returned to Chinese rule in 1997 and warned that the city would suffer if unsuitable individuals were voted in.
But there are fears the row, which has included personal attacks on pro-democracy politicians, could trigger more public anger which could in turn force an even stronger response from China's leaders.
"We are not afraid, we want democracy. The harsher Beijing is, the more we will demand," said office worker Daniel Wong.
The danger for Hong Kong is that the escalating confrontation rattles confidence in one of the world's main financial centers.
"If this situation prolongs, it will not be good. It could lead to large demonstrations and that may provoke an even stronger reaction from Beijing," said a money market dealer.
The big question for China is how many voters think like Mak?
Landslide for democrats?
Beijing's reprimands and warnings stem from a simple fear: that the leaders chosen by Hong Kong people will challenge its power.
"It is most worried that those elected will challenge its authority, support dissidents on the mainland, and Taiwan independence," said pollster and politics lecturer Timothy Wong of Hong Kong's Chinese University.
"Beijing wants Hong Kong people to set its mind at ease and promise not to deviate from these important principles before it will even talk about political reforms."
But the strategy is not working, if polls are to be believed. A survey of 1,237 people late last month by the independent Ming Pao newspaper showed 52 percent would vote for democracy candidates, while 25 percent would back pro-China parties.
A third of those polled said their impression of the central government had been damaged by the recent rhetoric from Beijing.
"If [Hong Kong] votes tomorrow, the democrats will have a landslide victory," Wong said.
If the democrats secure more than half of the 60 legislative seats, they will wield enough power for the first time to veto government policies and that could bring the China-backed administration to its knees.
Recession, protests
Like many others in the former British colony, Mak embraced Chinese rule and the economic perks that Beijing lavished on the city after the 1997 handover when it became embroiled in one economic recession after another.
But protests last year highlighted deep discontent with the China-backed administration, whose policies have been blamed for the city's financial troubles.
Opposition politicians, who are now in a minority and have no real power, have called for a rapid move to full direct elections by 2007, the earliest that the Constitution would allow.
Hong Kong was promised a high degree of autonomy under a "one country, two systems" agreement with Britain before the city was handed back to China.
But analysts say China, always wary of any threat to social stability, is unlikely to allow full democracy in Hong Kong and risk similar demands on the mainland.
China has underwritten confidence in Hong Kong as a world financial hub but there are signs the political wrangle is beginning to have an impact on the financial markets.
The Hong Kong dollar weakened slightly last Monday, which one dealer attributed partly to a fresh comment from a Chinese expert, who singled out a Hong Kong rights group as unpatriotic.
The group the expert named was the Hong Kong Alliance in Support of the Patriotic Democratic Movement in China, formed after the 1989 Tiananmen Square democracy protests in Beijing.
But some Hong Kong people say supporting pro-China candidates might be best for the city in the long run.
"It will not do to lock horns so aggressively with Beijing. It will only encourage it to throw out all our plans and we will be left with nothing. I will probably vote for pro-business candidates who have Beijing's ears," said executive Candy Lo.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS