For most in the international audience, the hottest issue in the March 20 election lies largely in the impact the referendum will have on the triangular relationship between Taipei, Washington and Beijing. They must be confused,then, by the fact that it is a convicted fugitive, not the presidential candidates, who has been attracting most of the media attention in recent weeks.
Why is the Chinese-language media so preoccupied by former Tuntex Chen Yu-hao (
The Cabinet announced a NT$10 million reward for information leading to Chen Yu-hao's capture last year. He is wanted for embezzlement and fled Taiwan leaving outstanding bank debts amounting to several billion dollars. As is so often the case, the media have been happy to air his accusations without demanding he provide concrete proof of his stories first. He has an axe to grind with the administration and has chosen the most sensitive time to launch an offensive and the media has been happy to play along.
Politicians and officials often float trial balloons in the media or spread rumors to smear their rivals. Rarely do journalists in this country ask for proof; few appear to ask any hard questions. Politicians and others can state the most absurd statistics and never worry about being challenged. This kind of spectacle must make outsiders question the media circus that has developed since the lifting of martial law.
The public lives in a real world filled with hopes, fears, dreams and anxieties. But they are not very good at figuring out what to do about them. Sometimes the media plays the role of bringing the private pains and needs of real people to public attention. However, the media isn't very good at prioritizing the public's concerns or figuring out what to do about them, especially when it comes to the question of commercial interests.
So they go for the easy stories. Most local media seemed to have no choice but to dance to Chen Yu-hao's tune. He initially faxed three letters to some pan-blue camp legislators and followed them up with newspaper and radio interviews. He promised details and facts -- but they were always to be delivered later. Because of the biased media culture that exists in this country, all parties related to the case fell into the typical cycle of political maneuvering. As a result, the credibility of the politicians and the media is even lower.
In its hubris, the media overestimates its power over the public. Reporters, call-in talk show hosts and people such as Chen Yu-hao think they can drive issues to the top of the list of the public's priorities. Yet, the evidence showed that it is often the public who decides on its priorities quite independently of the media.
Most people are quite clear about Chen Yu-hao's motives, regardless of what the media says. Ultimately, the public knows best . People have become suspicious of the media and increasingly sophisticated in recognizing its attempts at manipulation. The public now sees the media as a kind of special-interest group, no more objective than or independent of any other social groups in presenting its view. The wisdom of the Taiwanese people should not be underestimated.
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) in recent days was the focus of the media due to his role in arranging a Chinese “student” group to visit Taiwan. While his team defends the visit as friendly, civilized and apolitical, the general impression is that it was a political stunt orchestrated as part of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) propaganda, as its members were mainly young communists or university graduates who speak of a future of a unified country. While Ma lived in Taiwan almost his entire life — except during his early childhood in Hong Kong and student years in the US —
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers on Monday unilaterally passed a preliminary review of proposed amendments to the Public Officers Election and Recall Act (公職人員選罷法) in just one minute, while Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators, government officials and the media were locked out. The hasty and discourteous move — the doors of the Internal Administration Committee chamber were locked and sealed with plastic wrap before the preliminary review meeting began — was a great setback for Taiwan’s democracy. Without any legislative discussion or public witnesses, KMT Legislator Hsu Hsin-ying (徐欣瑩), the committee’s convener, began the meeting at 9am and announced passage of the
Prior to marrying a Taiwanese and moving to Taiwan, a Chinese woman, surnamed Zhang (張), used her elder sister’s identity to deceive Chinese officials and obtain a resident identity card in China. After marrying a Taiwanese, surnamed Chen (陳) and applying to move to Taiwan, Zhang continued to impersonate her sister to obtain a Republic of China ID card. She used the false identity in Taiwan for 18 years. However, a judge ruled that her case does not constitute forgery and acquitted her. Does this mean that — as long as a sibling agrees — people can impersonate others to alter, forge
In response to a failure to understand the “good intentions” behind the use of the term “motherland,” a professor from China’s Fudan University recklessly claimed that Taiwan used to be a colony, so all it needs is a “good beating.” Such logic is risible. The Central Plains people in China were once colonized by the Mongolians, the Manchus and other foreign peoples — does that mean they also deserve a “good beating?” According to the professor, having been ruled by the Cheng Dynasty — named after its founder, Ming-loyalist Cheng Cheng-kung (鄭成功, also known as Koxinga) — as the Kingdom of Tungning,
RSS