For most in the international audience, the hottest issue in the March 20 election lies largely in the impact the referendum will have on the triangular relationship between Taipei, Washington and Beijing. They must be confused,then, by the fact that it is a convicted fugitive, not the presidential candidates, who has been attracting most of the media attention in recent weeks.
Why is the Chinese-language media so preoccupied by former Tuntex Chen Yu-hao (
The Cabinet announced a NT$10 million reward for information leading to Chen Yu-hao's capture last year. He is wanted for embezzlement and fled Taiwan leaving outstanding bank debts amounting to several billion dollars. As is so often the case, the media have been happy to air his accusations without demanding he provide concrete proof of his stories first. He has an axe to grind with the administration and has chosen the most sensitive time to launch an offensive and the media has been happy to play along.
Politicians and officials often float trial balloons in the media or spread rumors to smear their rivals. Rarely do journalists in this country ask for proof; few appear to ask any hard questions. Politicians and others can state the most absurd statistics and never worry about being challenged. This kind of spectacle must make outsiders question the media circus that has developed since the lifting of martial law.
The public lives in a real world filled with hopes, fears, dreams and anxieties. But they are not very good at figuring out what to do about them. Sometimes the media plays the role of bringing the private pains and needs of real people to public attention. However, the media isn't very good at prioritizing the public's concerns or figuring out what to do about them, especially when it comes to the question of commercial interests.
So they go for the easy stories. Most local media seemed to have no choice but to dance to Chen Yu-hao's tune. He initially faxed three letters to some pan-blue camp legislators and followed them up with newspaper and radio interviews. He promised details and facts -- but they were always to be delivered later. Because of the biased media culture that exists in this country, all parties related to the case fell into the typical cycle of political maneuvering. As a result, the credibility of the politicians and the media is even lower.
In its hubris, the media overestimates its power over the public. Reporters, call-in talk show hosts and people such as Chen Yu-hao think they can drive issues to the top of the list of the public's priorities. Yet, the evidence showed that it is often the public who decides on its priorities quite independently of the media.
Most people are quite clear about Chen Yu-hao's motives, regardless of what the media says. Ultimately, the public knows best . People have become suspicious of the media and increasingly sophisticated in recognizing its attempts at manipulation. The public now sees the media as a kind of special-interest group, no more objective than or independent of any other social groups in presenting its view. The wisdom of the Taiwanese people should not be underestimated.
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
Last week, 24 Republican representatives in the US Congress proposed a resolution calling for US President Donald Trump’s administration to abandon the US’ “one China” policy, calling it outdated, counterproductive and not reflective of reality, and to restore official diplomatic relations with Taiwan, enter bilateral free-trade agreement negotiations and support its entry into international organizations. That is an exciting and inspiring development. To help the US government and other nations further understand that Taiwan is not a part of China, that those “one China” policies are contrary to the fact that the two countries across the Taiwan Strait are independent and
RSS