Vote 1, for everybody's sake
It is regrettable that the pan-blue camp could not set aside political ideologies to join hands with the 1.5 million-plus Taiwanese in peaceful solidarity to demonstrate against China's aggression on Feb. 28.
However, to the peace-loving, passionate Taiwanese who turned up hand-in-hand on Saturday, I salute you all and reserve for you my overwhelming respect and heartfelt gratitude. Your loyalty and love is awe-inspiring and has brought us much hope, goodwill and happy tears for an anniversary that was, until now, only a regrettable and bloody reminder of the despicable Chinese invasion of our homeland.
As the March 20 presidential election draws near, Taiwan is clearly at a crossroads. Without a doubt, the re-election of Chen Shui-bian (
The historic referendum must also be taken seriously. Voters must vote with the future in mind -- Taiwan can
ill afford to procrastinate and leave a political Chernobyl to future generations.
On March 20, voters must confront reality and bear its heavy cross as long as necessary to protect the right to self-determination of Taiwan's children.
They deserve nothing less.
Fifty-seven years ago, many thousands of unsung heroes lost their lives in the fight for freedom for all Taiwanese. Many more perished since that woeful time and millions who lived through the White Terror years under oppression and fear can attest to the dangers and uncertainty of reverting to Chinese rule. We can forgive but we must never forget
the suffering and oppression inflicted upon our nation by the invaders.
Above all, we must not ever forget the sacrifice and altruism of our predecessors who were murdered, jailed, oppressed, ridiculed and marginalized by those who invaded our country -- only because they dared to hope for justice.
On March 20, cast your hard-won vote in the spirit of all those who have fought and died for your freedom and the right to choose your destiny. Cast your vote in the memory of 228. Cast your vote with all the passion and love you have for our Ilha Formosa. Your vote is important, because justice must prevail in Taiwan.
Say yes to Taiwan: Vote 1 for Chen, for the sake of our beloved homeland, in the name of the past and in the name of the future.
Jennifer Chen
Melbourne, Australia
Taiwan aims to elevate its strategic position in supply chains by becoming an artificial intelligence (AI) hub for Nvidia Corp, providing everything from advanced chips and components to servers, in an attempt to edge out its closest rival in the region, South Korea. Taiwan’s importance in the AI ecosystem was clearly reflected in three major announcements Nvidia made during this year’s Computex trade show in Taipei. First, the US company’s number of partners in Taiwan would surge to 122 this year, from 34 last year, according to a slide shown during CEO Jensen Huang’s (黃仁勳) keynote speech on Monday last week.
When China passed its “Anti-Secession” Law in 2005, much of the democratic world saw it as yet another sign of Beijing’s authoritarianism, its contempt for international law and its aggressive posture toward Taiwan. Rightly so — on the surface. However, this move, often dismissed as a uniquely Chinese form of legal intimidation, echoes a legal and historical precedent rooted not in authoritarian tradition, but in US constitutional history. The Chinese “Anti-Secession” Law, a domestic statute threatening the use of force should Taiwan formally declare independence, is widely interpreted as an emblem of the Chinese Communist Party’s disregard for international norms. Critics
Birth, aging, illness and death are inevitable parts of the human experience. Yet, living well does not necessarily mean dying well. For those who have a chronic illness or cancer, or are bedridden due to significant injuries or disabilities, the remainder of life can be a torment for themselves and a hardship for their caregivers. Even if they wish to end their life with dignity, they are not allowed to do so. Bih Liu-ing (畢柳鶯), former superintendent of Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, introduced the practice of Voluntary Stopping of Eating and Drinking as an alternative to assisted dying, which remains
President William Lai (賴清德) has rightly identified the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) as a hostile force; and yet, Taiwan’s response to domestic figures amplifying CCP propaganda remains largely insufficient. The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) recently confirmed that more than 20 Taiwanese entertainers, including high-profile figures such as Ouyang Nana (歐陽娜娜), are under investigation for reposting comments and images supporting People’s Liberation Army (PLA) drills and parroting Beijing’s unification messaging. If found in contravention of the law, they may be fined between NT$100,000 and NT$500,000. That is not a deterrent. It is a symbolic tax on betrayal — perhaps even a way for