The people of Taiwan showed an astonishing determination and unity on Saturday, when close to 2 million people joined hands to form a human chain that stretched from the northern to the southern end of the country. They said "yes" to Taiwan and "no" to China. To the international community they said, "We are here!"
The human-chain rally was a milestone in the history of this nation's political movements. In the past, a rally of several tens of thousands of people would be enough to stun the Cabinet. In 1997, when Lien Chan (連戰) was concurrently serving as vice president and premier, close to 100,000 people took to the streets to protest deteriorating public safety. The protest led to Lien's resignation as premier. Saturday's rally set a record for the number of people taking to the streets at one time. Its consequences may prove far more impactful.
The size of the rally was a stunning accomplishment, but was still not large enough a figure for the main game, because 2 million votes is not enough to get a presidential candidate elected. The magic number needed for the March 20 election is 6.5 million. Pro-green camp forces still need to work hard to reach this mark in the face of a largely pro-blue camp media.
The human chain far exceeded the 1989 Baltic Chain in terms of numbers. But the Baltic rally was aiming instead for international support for the independence movements of the three Baltic states. Taiwan's rally has also attracted international attention, but the demands made at the rally were abstract and did not provide specific goals and methods to consolidate international support. Even though the rally's numbers far exceeded those of last year's 200,000-strong mobilization calling for a change to the country's official name, the demands presented at that time were far more precise.
Yet the rally may be of critical significance to the nation's future development. It was a democratic experiment pushing for a national political agenda. And it was a hugely successful experiment: The people of Taiwan have already grasped the fact that they can take the initiative in expressing their will directly. This is a concrete result of the deepening of Taiwan's democracy.
However, a successful experiment does not guarantee successful results.
The most important task now is to ensure that a leader who can represent public opinion and staunchly defend Taiwan's democratic path be elected on March 20, as well as maximizing the referendum vote against China's missile threat and for peaceful cross-strait negotiations.
The people of Taiwan are accustomed to representative democracy. Now they have a more direct and more effective way to express their opinion -- referendums. Referendums will be an important catalyst in the transition of the political culture. They will be a shield against China's subtle rhetorical weapon of "one country, two systems." They will also strengthen public oversight of major national policies and give Taiwan an enhanced voice in the international community.
The hand-in-hand rally has made the people of Taiwan understand that democratic power really is in their hands. This precious power already exists in their hearts. May both continue to grow and mature.
US$18.278 billion is a simple dollar figure; one that’s illustrative of the first Trump administration’s defense commitment to Taiwan. But what does Donald Trump care for money? During President Trump’s first term, the US defense department approved gross sales of “defense articles and services” to Taiwan of over US$18 billion. In September, the US-Taiwan Business Council compared Trump’s figure to the other four presidential administrations since 1993: President Clinton approved a total of US$8.702 billion from 1993 through 2000. President George W. Bush approved US$15.614 billion in eight years. This total would have been significantly greater had Taiwan’s Kuomintang-controlled Legislative Yuan been cooperative. During
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) in recent days was the focus of the media due to his role in arranging a Chinese “student” group to visit Taiwan. While his team defends the visit as friendly, civilized and apolitical, the general impression is that it was a political stunt orchestrated as part of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) propaganda, as its members were mainly young communists or university graduates who speak of a future of a unified country. While Ma lived in Taiwan almost his entire life — except during his early childhood in Hong Kong and student years in the US —
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers on Monday unilaterally passed a preliminary review of proposed amendments to the Public Officers Election and Recall Act (公職人員選罷法) in just one minute, while Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators, government officials and the media were locked out. The hasty and discourteous move — the doors of the Internal Administration Committee chamber were locked and sealed with plastic wrap before the preliminary review meeting began — was a great setback for Taiwan’s democracy. Without any legislative discussion or public witnesses, KMT Legislator Hsu Hsin-ying (徐欣瑩), the committee’s convener, began the meeting at 9am and announced passage of the
In response to a failure to understand the “good intentions” behind the use of the term “motherland,” a professor from China’s Fudan University recklessly claimed that Taiwan used to be a colony, so all it needs is a “good beating.” Such logic is risible. The Central Plains people in China were once colonized by the Mongolians, the Manchus and other foreign peoples — does that mean they also deserve a “good beating?” According to the professor, having been ruled by the Cheng Dynasty — named after its founder, Ming-loyalist Cheng Cheng-kung (鄭成功, also known as Koxinga) — as the Kingdom of Tungning,
RSS