The people of Taiwan showed an astonishing determination and unity on Saturday, when close to 2 million people joined hands to form a human chain that stretched from the northern to the southern end of the country. They said "yes" to Taiwan and "no" to China. To the international community they said, "We are here!"
The human-chain rally was a milestone in the history of this nation's political movements. In the past, a rally of several tens of thousands of people would be enough to stun the Cabinet. In 1997, when Lien Chan (連戰) was concurrently serving as vice president and premier, close to 100,000 people took to the streets to protest deteriorating public safety. The protest led to Lien's resignation as premier. Saturday's rally set a record for the number of people taking to the streets at one time. Its consequences may prove far more impactful.
The size of the rally was a stunning accomplishment, but was still not large enough a figure for the main game, because 2 million votes is not enough to get a presidential candidate elected. The magic number needed for the March 20 election is 6.5 million. Pro-green camp forces still need to work hard to reach this mark in the face of a largely pro-blue camp media.
The human chain far exceeded the 1989 Baltic Chain in terms of numbers. But the Baltic rally was aiming instead for international support for the independence movements of the three Baltic states. Taiwan's rally has also attracted international attention, but the demands made at the rally were abstract and did not provide specific goals and methods to consolidate international support. Even though the rally's numbers far exceeded those of last year's 200,000-strong mobilization calling for a change to the country's official name, the demands presented at that time were far more precise.
Yet the rally may be of critical significance to the nation's future development. It was a democratic experiment pushing for a national political agenda. And it was a hugely successful experiment: The people of Taiwan have already grasped the fact that they can take the initiative in expressing their will directly. This is a concrete result of the deepening of Taiwan's democracy.
However, a successful experiment does not guarantee successful results.
The most important task now is to ensure that a leader who can represent public opinion and staunchly defend Taiwan's democratic path be elected on March 20, as well as maximizing the referendum vote against China's missile threat and for peaceful cross-strait negotiations.
The people of Taiwan are accustomed to representative democracy. Now they have a more direct and more effective way to express their opinion -- referendums. Referendums will be an important catalyst in the transition of the political culture. They will be a shield against China's subtle rhetorical weapon of "one country, two systems." They will also strengthen public oversight of major national policies and give Taiwan an enhanced voice in the international community.
The hand-in-hand rally has made the people of Taiwan understand that democratic power really is in their hands. This precious power already exists in their hearts. May both continue to grow and mature.
Two weeks ago, Malaysian actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) raised hackles in Taiwan by posting to her 2.6 million Instagram followers that she was visiting “Taipei, China.” Yeoh’s post continues a long-standing trend of Chinese propaganda that spreads disinformation about Taiwan’s political status and geography, aimed at deceiving the world into supporting its illegitimate claims to Taiwan, which is not and has never been part of China. Taiwan must respond to this blatant act of cognitive warfare. Failure to respond merely cedes ground to China to continue its efforts to conquer Taiwan in the global consciousness to justify an invasion. Taiwan’s government
This month’s news that Taiwan ranks as Asia’s happiest place according to this year’s World Happiness Report deserves both celebration and reflection. Moving up from 31st to 27th globally and surpassing Singapore as Asia’s happiness leader is gratifying, but the true significance lies deeper than these statistics. As a society at the crossroads of Eastern tradition and Western influence, Taiwan embodies a distinctive approach to happiness worth examining more closely. The report highlights Taiwan’s exceptional habit of sharing meals — 10.1 shared meals out of 14 weekly opportunities, ranking eighth globally. This practice is not merely about food, but represents something more
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
RSS