The 228 Hand-in-Hand Rally has received widespread coverage in newspapers and on TV programs. Former president Lee Teng-hui (
We at Chen's Taichung-based campaign headquarters are also busy. I've received many phone calls from people asking how to participate in the rally. Our office sent out 800 invitations asking people to participate in the section of the chain for which I am responsible, hoping to find 400 who would actually participate; to our surprise, nearly 1,000 people signed up.
Ever since I started taking part in organizing the rally, I've been thinking about why Feb. 28 was chosen as the date for this massive rally. The following represents my personal understanding.
Since I believe that the 228 Incident is a very important collective memory for the Taiwanese people, and one of the factors in the formation of Taiwan's contemporary nationalism, I am obliged to offer my thoughts for discussion. I hope this article can encourage more people to join this rally to protect Taiwan.
Taiwan's history of the last century or so can be divided into two parts.
The period beginning with Japan's occupation of Taiwan in 1895 and going through the end of World War II is modern history; the period thereafter belongs to contemporary history.
The 228 Incident is the biggest and most profound event in the nation's contemporary history. It is not too much to say that this event has defined the nation's subsequent development.
The 228 Incident has become a decisive point in Taiwan's contemporary nationalism.
Under Japanese colonial rule, the people were suppressed, but gradually cultivated their own awareness.
Then the 228 Incident smashed China's pipe dream, helping Taiwanese people become aware of the distinction between themselves and the Chinese people, and more decisively strengthening the self-awareness of the Taiwanese people.
Then, in the 1990s, Taiwan's localization developed when China intimidated Taiwan through propaganda and military force, resulting in a great transformation of Taiwanese self-awareness into national identification.
At the same time, also starting from the advent of Japanese rule, Taiwanese ethnic groups adjusted their attitudes toward each other, as evidenced in the Wushe Incident (
Provoked by the 228 Incident, self-awareness continued to grow. For example, faced with the strength of people with roots in China, other ethnic groups developed attitudes of mutual solidarity.
Then in the 1990s, when democratization was under way, the four main ethnic groups were encouraged to strengthen their identities while at the same time showing respect (not integration and assimilation) toward each other.
People's identification with the new nation and harmony inside the nation are two issues of great significance to Taiwan's contemporary nationalism. The 228 Incident began the process, which accelerated during the 1990s when Lee was president. It is meaningful that it is Lee who is behind this rally.
The historic significance of the 228 Hand-in-Hand Rally is that Taiwanese people, based on their national identification with Taiwan, will stand up to say "no" to foreign invaders -- namely China, which has said it will not hesitate to use military force to annex Taiwan.
Moreover, Taiwanese people joining hands will demonstrate harmony and solidarity among all ethnic groups.
Around 150,000 people participated in a demonstration in Taipei last September to call for changing Taiwan's official name. Nearly 200,000 people turned out in Kaohsiung last October to push for a referendum.
Along the same lines, we hope to mobilize 1 million Taiwanese to join hands and say "no" to China's missiles and its intention to use military force.
This is an expression of Taiwanese contemporary nationalism, the growing consensus of the need to say "no" to China and the great leap forward in national identification.
For the public to say "no" to China, there are three concrete measures to be followed.
First, stand up and join hands.
Second, vote for Chen, who advocates "one country on each side" of the Taiwan Strait, and help him push for a new constitution and eventual realization of the nation-building goal.
Third, vote in the "peace referendum" on March 20. Say "no" to China. Say "yes" to Taiwan. Taiwan's national security will then be ensured.
I call on everyone in Taiwan to participate in these three historic activities.
Let us push Taiwan's contemporary nationalism to its highest point and strengthen our sense of national identification.
Hsu Shih-kai is a co-founder of a group promoting the 228 Hand-in-Hand Rally.
Translated by Jackie Lin
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS