Hong Kong is a poor model
Beijing's "one country, two systems" scheme is quickly revealing its true colors ("Hong Kong reform talks `just show,'" Feb. 17, page 1).
To add credibility to its unification plan, Beijing promised in 1997 that it would leave Hong Kong's socioeconomic system and way of life unchanged for 50 years. Pundits praised Bei-jing for assuring Hong Kong's anxious residents.
Ironically Beijing now can make good on this "generous" offer and deprive Hong Kong of a chance to democratize (perhaps until 2047) because the territory, despite its many freedoms, was not a democracy in 1997. If Beijing feels insecure, Hong Kong cannot democratize. Thus, "one country, two systems" looks increasingly like "one country, one system" -- China's, not Hong Kong's.
Before the handover the international community erroneously focused on whether Chinese tanks would roll through Hong Kong's streets. The real threat turns out to be China's steady encroachment on Hong Kong's freedoms. This is hardly a model for Taiwan.
Vincent Wang
Richmond, Virginia
Going for the record
I was pleased to see you chose the "overwhelming support" for the human-chain rally as your lead story ("Human-chain rally gathering steam," Feb. 17, page 1). I wonder exactly what a scheduled participant is, but if more than 1 million people have already stated their intention to participate, then it is a good start.
The Guinness Book of Records states that the longest human chain ever was up to 2 million people long and stretched 595km across the three Baltic states of Lithuania, Estonia and Latvia.
Maybe we have a chance. Maybe this is something people can get excited about. Wouldn't that make some blue-camp politicians grimace! And they would probably have to join in too.
Interestingly, and perhaps propitiously for Taiwan, the record-setting event was a big deal politically. At that time, in 1989, some nations had already escaped the grasp of Soviet rule, but the Baltic states hadn't. To quote the Central Europe Review, "this unprecedented protest action against Soviet rule brought the national liberation movements into the spotlight, setting an irreversible course for the three captive nations."
The event was held on the 50th anniversary of the Nazi-Soviet non-aggression treaty which led to the illegal invasion and occupation of those countries by the USSR. The rally was essentially a declaration of independence by the people, parallel to the Velvet Revolution or the fall of the Berlin Wall. It was followed by two turbulent years of ineffective repression by the USSR until the three states officially declared their independence and were quickly recognized both de jure and de facto by Iceland.
Interestingly, the US was among the very last countries to follow suit.
So now I wonder how many will actually turn out on Feb. 28. It doesn't matter if the record is broken or not. It will be another fine attempt to trump repression with mass-action nonviolence.
Who knows? Maybe it will turn out to be more important than either the election or the referendum. Maybe we can make a chain around the whole island next time. Or a giant happy face. That would surely make headlines around the world and redden Beijing's face.
Peter Dearman
Taipei
Soong is shameless
Your recent article ("Soong rails against `illegal' referendum and refuses to vote," Feb. 18, page 3) tells clearly that, after all these years, People First Party Chair-man James Soong (宋楚瑜) is still conspiring to deprive the Tai-wanese people of freedom of speech. Soong's mentality remains the same as when he headed the Government Information Office under the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) regime in the martial-law era.
In those dark days, he was the one who did not observe the law and illegally suppressed people's viewpoints. Sadly, he is now shamelessly running for the office of vice president of a full-fledged democratic Taiwan.
He can't have his cake and eat it too.
Taitzer Wang
Cincinnati, Ohio
Stop gravel mining
I'm an American who has been in Taiwan for nearly 20 years, living in Taitung for 11 years of them. You should be aware that every day nearly 1,000 gravel trucks are carrying gravel out of Taitung. Every single riverbed from Tawu to Taitung is being systematically stripped.
The highway is falling into the ocean, the bridge stanchions are eroding away.
I don't know if gravel mining in the riverbeds and on the shore is legal, but it is sure to be a major environmental disaster in the very near future. The wetlands where the birds migrate are destroyed. The beaches near the river mouths are already washed away, rendering the coastline useless and eroding the bedrock below the recently completed four-lane coastal highway.
Ironically, at the same time, the national government is spending billions on developing the area for tourism.
This has already been going on for the past three months. It started shortly after the Taitung County Council decided not to accept the proposal for the nuclear waste repository. You should consider that the current gravel mining may be a reprisal for this, especially considering that the majority of the mining is being done in the Tawu area.
The current rate of mining deserves the immediate attention of the appropriate branches of government. And an environmental impact study should be conducted before the mining continues. The current condition is reckless, irresponsible and shows absolutely no respect for common decency, the environment or common sense. When the rainy season comes and the typhoon season comes, the damage done will surely be in the billions of NT dollars.
I'm told that the gravel industry and government officials who turn their backs on this kind of activity are `dangerous people' and that I should do nothing, say nothing, for my own safety. But I don't believe that. I have known only polite and courteous people here, in every branch of government. I'm sure that they simply don't realize what they are doing.
Malcolm Vargas
Taitung
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS