Hong Kong is a poor model
Beijing's "one country, two systems" scheme is quickly revealing its true colors ("Hong Kong reform talks `just show,'" Feb. 17, page 1).
To add credibility to its unification plan, Beijing promised in 1997 that it would leave Hong Kong's socioeconomic system and way of life unchanged for 50 years. Pundits praised Bei-jing for assuring Hong Kong's anxious residents.
Ironically Beijing now can make good on this "generous" offer and deprive Hong Kong of a chance to democratize (perhaps until 2047) because the territory, despite its many freedoms, was not a democracy in 1997. If Beijing feels insecure, Hong Kong cannot democratize. Thus, "one country, two systems" looks increasingly like "one country, one system" -- China's, not Hong Kong's.
Before the handover the international community erroneously focused on whether Chinese tanks would roll through Hong Kong's streets. The real threat turns out to be China's steady encroachment on Hong Kong's freedoms. This is hardly a model for Taiwan.
Vincent Wang
Richmond, Virginia
Going for the record
I was pleased to see you chose the "overwhelming support" for the human-chain rally as your lead story ("Human-chain rally gathering steam," Feb. 17, page 1). I wonder exactly what a scheduled participant is, but if more than 1 million people have already stated their intention to participate, then it is a good start.
The Guinness Book of Records states that the longest human chain ever was up to 2 million people long and stretched 595km across the three Baltic states of Lithuania, Estonia and Latvia.
Maybe we have a chance. Maybe this is something people can get excited about. Wouldn't that make some blue-camp politicians grimace! And they would probably have to join in too.
Interestingly, and perhaps propitiously for Taiwan, the record-setting event was a big deal politically. At that time, in 1989, some nations had already escaped the grasp of Soviet rule, but the Baltic states hadn't. To quote the Central Europe Review, "this unprecedented protest action against Soviet rule brought the national liberation movements into the spotlight, setting an irreversible course for the three captive nations."
The event was held on the 50th anniversary of the Nazi-Soviet non-aggression treaty which led to the illegal invasion and occupation of those countries by the USSR. The rally was essentially a declaration of independence by the people, parallel to the Velvet Revolution or the fall of the Berlin Wall. It was followed by two turbulent years of ineffective repression by the USSR until the three states officially declared their independence and were quickly recognized both de jure and de facto by Iceland.
Interestingly, the US was among the very last countries to follow suit.
So now I wonder how many will actually turn out on Feb. 28. It doesn't matter if the record is broken or not. It will be another fine attempt to trump repression with mass-action nonviolence.
Who knows? Maybe it will turn out to be more important than either the election or the referendum. Maybe we can make a chain around the whole island next time. Or a giant happy face. That would surely make headlines around the world and redden Beijing's face.
Peter Dearman
Taipei
Soong is shameless
Your recent article ("Soong rails against `illegal' referendum and refuses to vote," Feb. 18, page 3) tells clearly that, after all these years, People First Party Chair-man James Soong (宋楚瑜) is still conspiring to deprive the Tai-wanese people of freedom of speech. Soong's mentality remains the same as when he headed the Government Information Office under the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) regime in the martial-law era.
In those dark days, he was the one who did not observe the law and illegally suppressed people's viewpoints. Sadly, he is now shamelessly running for the office of vice president of a full-fledged democratic Taiwan.
He can't have his cake and eat it too.
Taitzer Wang
Cincinnati, Ohio
Stop gravel mining
I'm an American who has been in Taiwan for nearly 20 years, living in Taitung for 11 years of them. You should be aware that every day nearly 1,000 gravel trucks are carrying gravel out of Taitung. Every single riverbed from Tawu to Taitung is being systematically stripped.
The highway is falling into the ocean, the bridge stanchions are eroding away.
I don't know if gravel mining in the riverbeds and on the shore is legal, but it is sure to be a major environmental disaster in the very near future. The wetlands where the birds migrate are destroyed. The beaches near the river mouths are already washed away, rendering the coastline useless and eroding the bedrock below the recently completed four-lane coastal highway.
Ironically, at the same time, the national government is spending billions on developing the area for tourism.
This has already been going on for the past three months. It started shortly after the Taitung County Council decided not to accept the proposal for the nuclear waste repository. You should consider that the current gravel mining may be a reprisal for this, especially considering that the majority of the mining is being done in the Tawu area.
The current rate of mining deserves the immediate attention of the appropriate branches of government. And an environmental impact study should be conducted before the mining continues. The current condition is reckless, irresponsible and shows absolutely no respect for common decency, the environment or common sense. When the rainy season comes and the typhoon season comes, the damage done will surely be in the billions of NT dollars.
I'm told that the gravel industry and government officials who turn their backs on this kind of activity are `dangerous people' and that I should do nothing, say nothing, for my own safety. But I don't believe that. I have known only polite and courteous people here, in every branch of government. I'm sure that they simply don't realize what they are doing.
Malcolm Vargas
Taitung
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS