In a speech before the US Congress, US Secretary of State Colin Powell said the Bush administration "doesn't really see a need" for Taiwan to hold a referendum, "but Taiwan is a democratic place, if they choose to have a referendum, they can have a referendum. We've made clear to them, however, that we do not want to see these actions lead in any way to change in the situation."
What Powell meant was, first, there is no need for Taiwan to hold a referendum; second, the US does not oppose a referendum in Taiwan.
However, Chinese-language media all over the world lead their stories with headlines emphasizing the US' opposition to the referendum rather than its respect for Taiwan's democracy. Such discourse obviously coincides with China's position in opposing the referendum and fomenting dissension between the US and Taiwan. It also reflects Beijing's success in permeating and brainwashing the Chinese-language media.
After his meeting with Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao (溫家寶), US President George W. Bush made some comments on Taiwan's political situation. Beijing on the one hand "encouraged" Bush by praising him. On the other, it said that Washington had not done enough in taking concrete steps to prevent Taiwan from holding a referendum. Some Chinese "academics" made this known to the US by making comments. Chen Yunlin (陳雲林), the head of the Taiwan Affairs Office of China's State Council, also put pressure on the Bush administration during his US visit earlier this month.
Next, Chinese Vice Foreign Minister Zhou Wenzhong (
These insatiable demands and truculent threats that disregarded the sovereignty of the US finally repulsed the US Congress and government. They thus took the following actions recently to refrain China:
First, the US pointed out that China's military threat is also very dangerous to the cross-strait relationship and represents an attempt to change the status quo.
Second, Washington pressured European nations several times not to lift their arms embargo against China.
Third, the US transferred a group of B52 bombers and a couple of nuclear submarines to Guam. This move seemed to target North Korea but in fact they are closer to the Taiwan Strait.
Fourth, Washington is thinking about proposing a motion at the UN Human Rights Commission, due to open soon, to criticize China's human rights record.
Fifth, US Under Secretary for Global Affairs Paula Dobriansky said that dissemination of democracy is an important component of the war against terrorism. From her statement, we can understand why Powell respects Taiwan's decision to hold the referendum.
Sadly, Taiwan cannot have referendum questions on more important, sensitive issues under the pressure exerted internationally by China.
Sadly again, a democratic superpower like the US has to compromise under China's intimidation on the issue of Taiwan.
However, as a world leader, the US can be reasonably expected by Taiwan to do more in disseminating the universal value of democracy.
Paul Lin is a political commentator based in New York.
Translated by Jennie Shih
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS