In a speech before the US Congress, US Secretary of State Colin Powell said the Bush administration "doesn't really see a need" for Taiwan to hold a referendum, "but Taiwan is a democratic place, if they choose to have a referendum, they can have a referendum. We've made clear to them, however, that we do not want to see these actions lead in any way to change in the situation."
What Powell meant was, first, there is no need for Taiwan to hold a referendum; second, the US does not oppose a referendum in Taiwan.
However, Chinese-language media all over the world lead their stories with headlines emphasizing the US' opposition to the referendum rather than its respect for Taiwan's democracy. Such discourse obviously coincides with China's position in opposing the referendum and fomenting dissension between the US and Taiwan. It also reflects Beijing's success in permeating and brainwashing the Chinese-language media.
After his meeting with Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao (溫家寶), US President George W. Bush made some comments on Taiwan's political situation. Beijing on the one hand "encouraged" Bush by praising him. On the other, it said that Washington had not done enough in taking concrete steps to prevent Taiwan from holding a referendum. Some Chinese "academics" made this known to the US by making comments. Chen Yunlin (陳雲林), the head of the Taiwan Affairs Office of China's State Council, also put pressure on the Bush administration during his US visit earlier this month.
Next, Chinese Vice Foreign Minister Zhou Wenzhong (
These insatiable demands and truculent threats that disregarded the sovereignty of the US finally repulsed the US Congress and government. They thus took the following actions recently to refrain China:
First, the US pointed out that China's military threat is also very dangerous to the cross-strait relationship and represents an attempt to change the status quo.
Second, Washington pressured European nations several times not to lift their arms embargo against China.
Third, the US transferred a group of B52 bombers and a couple of nuclear submarines to Guam. This move seemed to target North Korea but in fact they are closer to the Taiwan Strait.
Fourth, Washington is thinking about proposing a motion at the UN Human Rights Commission, due to open soon, to criticize China's human rights record.
Fifth, US Under Secretary for Global Affairs Paula Dobriansky said that dissemination of democracy is an important component of the war against terrorism. From her statement, we can understand why Powell respects Taiwan's decision to hold the referendum.
Sadly, Taiwan cannot have referendum questions on more important, sensitive issues under the pressure exerted internationally by China.
Sadly again, a democratic superpower like the US has to compromise under China's intimidation on the issue of Taiwan.
However, as a world leader, the US can be reasonably expected by Taiwan to do more in disseminating the universal value of democracy.
Paul Lin is a political commentator based in New York.
Translated by Jennie Shih
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS