With little regard for Chinese customs, US President George W. Bush criticized China in a speech at a community school in Ohio State on Jan. 21, the first day of the Lunar New Year holidays. Bush reiterated the US' pursuit of free trade and demanded that the country's trade partners follow the trade principles of fairness and freedom. He singled out China, which enjoys a massive trade surplus with the US, as an example of a country pursuing unfair trade policies. The main cause of the trade imbalance, he said, was China's policy of keeping the yuan weak against the US dollar.
Bush's accusation reminds many people of a series of measures Beijing took to suppress the yuan from strengthening in the latter half of last year. After some defensive and offensive moves, the official value of the yuan remained unchanged and pegged to the US dollar, but China has also lowered export rebate rates to curb exports and maintain the yuan's value.
However, the pressure on the yuan to appreciate also remains. Many international media forecast at the end of last year that the yuan would appreciate early this year. Will Bush's comments help realize this forecast?
I believe everyone is eager to know the answer to this hotly debated issue. The so-called experts and professionals naturally will not miss this great opportunity to boost their reputation. The problem is: Is there really a standard answer? Who exactly has the power to make this decision? Why does this issue concern people so much?
As China is called the "world's factory," it is easy to understand why the yuan's value is in the international spotlight. Investors from around the world flock to China. Speculators also cast a greedy eye on the prey. China's magnetic pull on global funds offers clear proof of this issue's importance.
From the import and export of products to the inflow and outflow of hot money in speculative trading, everything is affected by the yuan's value. Any slight change results in enormous gains and losses. The yuan's fluctuation will only become an ever hotter issue as the Chinese economy grows. The likelihood of it triggering a domino effect is more than theoretical. In light of this, maintaining the stability of the yuan is reasonable. How to maintain its stability thus becomes a global issue. But is it possible to reach this goal?
Setting aside basic theories, everyone is clear that the fluctuation of the yuan is not just an economic issue, but also a political one.
Beijing tries to control the market with its "black hand" behind the scenes. This appears to be effective on the surface and in the short term. But in the end market forces will react, as is happening already.
This should be a familiar scene to those who have studied Taiwan's economic development in the 1980s. In 1986 the New Taiwan dollar rose sharply and was liberalized. Could this happen in China this year?
Wu Hui-lin is a research fellow at the Chung Hua Institution for Economic Research.
Translated by Jackie Lin
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
Last week, 24 Republican representatives in the US Congress proposed a resolution calling for US President Donald Trump’s administration to abandon the US’ “one China” policy, calling it outdated, counterproductive and not reflective of reality, and to restore official diplomatic relations with Taiwan, enter bilateral free-trade agreement negotiations and support its entry into international organizations. That is an exciting and inspiring development. To help the US government and other nations further understand that Taiwan is not a part of China, that those “one China” policies are contrary to the fact that the two countries across the Taiwan Strait are independent and
RSS