An independent country, especially a democratic one, has the right to hold referendums to decide major national policies. This is not only a right but a duty -- a "universal value" recognized by the people of the world, especially those of the world's democratic nations.
Therefore, it is the most basic democratic right of the Taiwanese people to hold a "defensive referendum." No other countries, including China, Japan or the US, have a greater say on the matter. But China is using every possible means to shrink Taiwan's international space, pressuring Japan, the US and other European countries by claiming that President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) is promoting Taiwan's independence and changing the status quo in the Taiwan Strait. As a result, Japan, the US and most recently France have expressed their concern to Taiwan, and have even opposed Taiwan holding a referendum in March.
These developments are in fact part of the normal operation of international politics. Each country's attitude has complex dimensions and can be interpreted differently. This is not something worthy of panic. From Taiwan's perspective, Chen has his views on how to rule the nation, as well as to what degree Taiwan should resist pressure from China, Japan and the US. All of this is open to public scrutiny.
But in view of China's behavior, if a nation were a normal and independent sovereign state, its people would unite to resist China's hegemonic bent and protest against the interference of Japan, the US and other countries in its domestic affairs.
Unfortunately, Taiwan is an abnormal country. Chen and Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Lien Chan (
Remember the absurd moment when Lien compared Chen to Osama bin Laden, the guru of international terrorism? Chen is holding a defensive referendum, and claims that the presidential election is in fact "a sacred battle between the Taiwanese people and the Chinese Communist Party." This statement was absolutely legitimate. But Lien seems to believe that Chen's "sacred battle" statement was in the same vein as bin Laden's terrorism agenda, and said that the president could go right ahead if he wanted to die, and that he wasn't interested in going to war alongside the president.
Chen is holding a preventive referendum to demand China cease threatening Taiwan with its ballistic missiles. China is in fact the real al-Qaeda, and Chinese President Hu Jintao (
These remarks were not only stunning in their shamelessness but also frightening to many Taiwanese people. With an opposition presidential candidate blathering on in this capitulationist vein, does Taiwan really need China for an enemy?
People First Party (PFP) Chair-man James Soong (宋楚瑜) has also been a champion of capitulationism. He is both unwilling and unable to maintain Taiwan's sovereignty, and is singing the nation's demise. He recently mimicked and even exaggerated the concerns of Japan, the US and other countries. Not only did he lobby the blue camp to prevent the launch of referendums on the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant and other issues at the Legislative Yuan, and called on Chen to give up his defensive referendum, he also claimed that "no nation in the world can afford to irritate China." His remarks were stunning and frightening. I can't help but wonder whether Soong is running for the vice presidency of China.
Irritate China? Taiwan's efforts to maintain its sovereignty over the past 50 years have irritated China. The US' "three communiques" based on its "one-China" policy and the Taiwan Relations Act have irritated China. Washington letting Chen and Vice President Annette Lu (
The European Parliament passed a resolution recently demanding Beijing not wage war across the Strait and withdraw its missiles; this irritated China. India's development of nuclear weapons has irritated China. Former Japanese prime minister Yoshiro Mori visited Taiwan last month and irritated China. It must be a sign of the apocalypse if all these democratic countries dare irritate China.
In a word, both Lien and Soong have divested themselves of any dignity. They dare not support the international status of the nation. Will Taiwan remain a democratic and independent sovereignty in the future if this pair is elected? I really don't think so.
Hopefully, the Taiwanese people can see through this on March 20. They must use their ballots to recognize and maintain the sovereignty of Taiwan.
Chiou Chwei-liang is a visiting professor at the Graduate Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, Tamkang University.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
As an American living in Taiwan, I have to confess how impressed I have been over the years by the Chinese Communist Party’s wholehearted embrace of high-speed rail and electric vehicles, and this at a time when my own democratic country has chosen a leader openly committed to doing everything in his power to put obstacles in the way of sustainable energy across the board — and democracy to boot. It really does make me wonder: “Are those of us right who hold that democracy is the right way to go?” Has Taiwan made the wrong choice? Many in China obviously
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
About 6.1 million couples tied the knot last year, down from 7.28 million in 2023 — a drop of more than 20 percent, data from the Chinese Ministry of Civil Affairs showed. That is more serious than the precipitous drop of 12.2 percent in 2020, the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. As the saying goes, a single leaf reveals an entire autumn. The decline in marriages reveals problems in China’s economic development, painting a dismal picture of the nation’s future. A giant question mark hangs over economic data that Beijing releases due to a lack of clarity, freedom of the press
RSS