The H5N1 avian flu strain that has shocked the World Health Organization (WHO) first appeared in Hong Kong in 1997. This year the virus seems to have become more virulent as it spreads across Asia. Currently, poultry farms in Japan, South Korea, Vietnam, Thailand, Indonesia, Cambodia and Pakistan have been affected. Tens of millions of chickens have been culled. The speed of the contagion is unprecedented and its impact on Asia's poultry farmers cannot be ignored.
What is especially worrisome is that six people reportedly died in Vietnam from bird flu, raising concerns throughout the region and at the WHO. According to epidemiologists, the wide scope of the contagion, the inter-species transmission and the successive transmission to one poultry farm after another have been some of the unusual features of this outbreak. The speed of transmission appears to have taken the WHO by surprise.
In Taiwan, outbreaks have been reported in some poultry farms in the center and south of the country. This has resulted in the slaughter of around 200,000 chickens. According to test results, however, the outbreaks were not caused by the virulent H5N1 strain of avian flu. But as happened with last year's SARS epidemic, no WHO officials have come here yet to offer assistance in epidemic prevention. Such a repeat is deplorable.
Can other countries really afford for Taiwan to become a loophole in efforts to stop the spread of bird flu?
The WHO, which is responsible for ensuring humanity's health, continues to kowtow to Chinese political pressure and reject Taiwan's participation.
China has repeatedly lied to the world, saying that Beijing can take care of the Taiwanese people's health needs. In reality, however, China has spread diseases to Taiwan -- from the foot-and-mouth epidemic a few years ago to SARS. Those outbreaks showed the world the deficiencies of the Chinese health-care system and its bureaucracy. How can China take care of Taiwan if it cannot even take good care of its own people?
Everyone knows that rapid disease control is very important when contagious diseases like SARS and bird flu break out. Think about it. Tens of thousands of people travel in and out of Taiwan every day. Once a new disease appears in Taiwan, it could spread to other parts of the world in a couple of days. If Taiwan remains unable to get timely global epidemic information or link itself to the international epidemic-prevention network, then we won't have to think hard to see what price the international community may have to pay for leaving a loophole open in Taiwan.
We are happy to see the Thai government quickly invite experts from other Asian countries, including Taiwan, to an epidemic-prevention conference. This reflects the growing awareness among Asian countries that only when truly united can they effectively prevent further spread of the outbreak. Thailand knows that Taiwan must not be allowed to become a loophole in the prevention work. What legitimate reason can other WHO members still cite to exclude this nation from that organization?
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS