On Dec. 30 last year, China's ambassador to the US, Yang Jiechi (
The opening paragraph of the letter is as follows:
"I have learnt with deep concern that some Congressional members are currently drafting a resolution to support the Taiwan authorities' attempt to hold a `referendum' and write a `new constitution.' This is a highly political issue which deserves close attention."
Yang went on to argue that the proposed referendum is "a cover for [President Chen Shui-bian's (
Chen, on the other hand, insists that the defensive referendum is intended to make the people of Taiwan more aware of China's military threat and to help preserve the status quo.? He wants to conduct the referendum on March 20, in conjunction with the presidential election, in spite of the objections of the administration of US President George W. Bush.
China has threatened to use force if Taiwan holds a referendum. In July last year, Chen Yunlin (
On Dec. 17, Li Weiyi (
So there exists the potential for Chinese military action against Taiwan in March or around May 20, the day the winner of the election will be inaugurated. Yet it is virtually impossible for Chen Shui-bian to accede to the Bush administration's wishes.
Over the past few years, there has been a groundswell of nationalism in Taiwan in response to China's intransigence.
There were two demonstrations last year in support of a referendum law and a new constitution to improve the efficiency of government. The demonstrators numbered 150,000 in Taipei and 200,000 in Kaohsiung. No political party that ignores such an outpouring of popular will can stay in power.
That is why the pan-blue alliance of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the People First Party reversed its long-held positions and pushed for the passage of its version of the Referendum Law (
The US' interest is maintaining the status quo, which gives Taiwan de facto independent status.
If the Bush administration succeeds in compelling Chen Shui-bian to abandon the peace referendum, his disappointed supporters could well abstain from voting to protest his betrayal of democratic values. Chen Shui-bian's defeat would likely result in Taiwan's capitulation to China within a couple of years. This would effectively terminate the US' role as guarantor of peace and stability, drastically alter the geopolitical landscape of East Asia and usher in instability and turmoil in the region.
What can be done to resolve the impasse? The first step is to do away with the misconceptions and falsehoods that surround the dispute about Taiwan's proposed referendum.
Below is an open letter to members of the US House of Representatives that rebuts Yang's letter and offers a proper way to forestall a conflict in the Taiwan Strait.
"Dear Representative: As your constituent, I am concerned about the seeming disagreement between President George W. Bush and President Chen Shui-bian regarding the `peace referendum' which Chen proposes to conduct on March 20, 2004, in conjunction with the presidential election in Taiwan.
"The US' Taiwan Relations Act (Public Law 96-8) states: `The preservation and enhancement of the human rights of all the people on Taiwan are hereby affirmed as objectives of the United States'? (Section 2(c)).
"To achieve the objectives described in the act, the Bush administration is mandated by Congress to `maintain the capacity of the United States to resist any resort to force or other forms of coercion that would jeopardize the security, or the social or economic system, of the people on Taiwan'? (Section 2(a)(6)).
"On Dec. 30, Ambassador Jiechi Yang of China sent you a letter outlining China's objections to the `peace referendum.' I would like to point out some factual errors in that letter.
"The US does not recognize China's claim of sovereignty over Taiwan. We merely acknowledge the Chinese position, without agreeing to it.
"The US' `one China' policy differs from China's `one China' principle in other respects. The US insists on peaceful resolution of Taiwan's future status and that any settlement must have the assent of the people of Taiwan. China insists that it has a right to resort to force and coercion and that the future status of Taiwan is to be decided exclusively by the Chinese government.
"Yang asserts that China's basic policy is `peaceful reunification.' China ceded Taiwan to Japan in 1895. Since then Taiwan has been ruled by a central Chinese government for only four years -- 1945 to 1949. The current government in Beijing has never ruled Taiwan.
"The word `reunification' is a misnomer; `annexation' is more apt. The word `peaceful' is inappropriate, too, since China has for years been developing the military capability to launch a multi-pronged attack against Taiwan and to deny US forces the opportunity to render assistance in time. Beyond the several hundred missiles targeted at Taiwan, the People's Liberation Army has acquired modern weaponry and conducted massive military exercises -- these are hardly evidence of peaceful intentions.
"Chen Shui-bian's `peace referendum' will ask China to renounce the use of force and to withdraw the missiles deployed against Taiwan. It is a defensive referendum which does not involve independence or annexation. China's concern that any referendum mechanism can later be utilized to decide Taiwan's sovereignty is disingenuous.
"Taiwan's Referendum Law, which was passed on Nov. 27 last year, was drafted by the pan-blue alliance, which favors Taiwan's eventual annexation by China. The law is designed to prevent a referendum on the independence or annexation issue.
"From the US' standpoint, a referendum is desirable. How else could the people of Taiwan express their assent to a proposed settlement of Taiwan's status?
"In order to preserve Taiwan's hard-won freedom and to keep the peace in the Taiwan Strait, we request that you support the resolution soon to be introduced in the House of Representatives to urge the Bush administration to (1) affirm our commitment to defend Taiwan's democracy in accordance with the Taiwan Relations Act; (2) refrain from interfering in Taiwan's domestic politics and withdraw its objections to Chen Shui-bian's "peace referendum," which cannot be deemed "provocative" by any stretch of the imagination; and (3) reinforce US naval and air presence in the Western Pacific promptly so as to deter any military adventure by China.
"While much of the US ground force is tied up in Iraq and the US military is stretched thin, we can deploy sufficient naval and air power in the Western Pacific to deter Chinese military aggression against democratic Taiwan.
"At issue are not just the freedom of the 23 million citizens of Taiwan and peace in the Taiwan Strait, but also whether China will become a peaceful member of the global community or instead turn into an expansionist power intent on becoming the hegemon of Asia and beyond.
"Standing firmly with our democratic friends is in our national interest.
"As the wise former US Representative Gerald Solomon said: `Taiwan's security is ultimately America's security as well.'
"I look forward to hearing your view on this important subject."
Li Thian-hok is a freelance commentator in Pennsylvania.
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS