President Chen Shui-bian (
However, due to the official restraints of their mission, they may not be able to challenge the hypocrisy of the major powers, which advocate maintaining the so-called status quo and stability in the region at the expense of democracy.
I have no doubt about US President George W. Bush's sincerity in support of democracy in Taiwan. When he stated his opposition to any unilateral decision either by China or Taiwan to change the status quo, he conspicuously avoided using the word "referendum."
Even senior US officials prefer to remain anonymous when they imply that the US is concerned about the referendum.
Bush and his administration decline to define the term "status quo," but the PRC uses its propaganda campaign to try to define the status quo as being based on "one China," with Taiwan a part of China. Beijing claims that any referendum in Taiwan is a step toward Taiwanese independence. Unlike the US, the PRC is not ashamed to oppose a democratic referendum process.
For Taiwan, it is unfortunate that certain China hands have a stubborn habit of appeasing the PRC at the expense of the fundamental political rights of the people of Taiwan.
They do not blame the PRC's threat to use force for disrupting stability in the Taiwan Strait, but instead accuse Taiwan's democratization of being a cause for concern.
If the US and China are sincere about maintaining stability in the region, the right approach is for the major powers to respect the democratic process and recognize the true status quo concerning national borders -- and integrate Taiwan and North Korea into the international community.
Taiwan is a full democracy and North Korea, like the PRC, is a communist totalitarian regime. North Korea is violating international rules and Taiwan is not. But to a certain degree both of them have been isolated from the international community. At the insistence of South Korea, the US and Japan refuse to recognize the rogue state of North Korea.
Submitting to the demands of the PRC, the US, Japan, South Korea and other major powers refuse to recognize Taiwan as a sovereign state.
If a Taiwan under authoritarian rule was good enough for the US, Japan and other major powers to recognize as a sovereign state, a democratic Taiwan is in a better position to be recognized as a sovereign state.
Taiwan has been excluded from the UN and international organizations such as the World Bank and the World Health Organization for over 30 years. The US and Japan have refused to recognize Taiwan as an independent state for over two decades. This is not the right way to handle international affairs.
Pro-China scholars and politicians used to argued that isolating China could only be bad for stability. Similarly, the isolation of Taiwan and North Korea is not helpful for the stability of the region. Therefore, the best approach for managing the two flash points in East Asia is for the major powers to respect democracy and recognize the status quo.
The US, Japan and South Korea should recognize North Korea and the US, Japan, Russia and South Korea should persuade the PRC to recognize Taiwan as a sovereign state and integrate Taiwan into the international community.
It was wrong and embarrassing for Bush to indicate opposition to Taiwan's democratic referendum process. He and his aides should know better.
When Lithuania declared independence and faced the threat of a military crackdown by the former Soviet Union, then US president George Bush instructed ambassador Jack Matlock to warn Soviet president Mikhail Gobarchev against the use of force and suggested a referendum as a proper way to resolve the impasse.
The current US president should stand firm on principle in dealing with disputes in the region. He should reassess the "one China" policy, respect democratic evolution and recognize Taiwan as a sovereign state.
Inclusion of Taiwan in the international community, instead of exclusion, will contribute to stability in the region.
James Wang is a journalist based in Washington.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS