China's national security agencies announced Thursday that they have arrested another Taiwanese "spy." They also announced details of "spy" cases involving Taiwanese businesspeople operating in China and their addresses in Taiwan, and have invited Taiwanese journalists to interview these "Taiwanese spies."
The Chinese government has handled these spy cases in a sensationalistic way -- as Iraq did in publicizing photographs of war prisoners -- to initiate a psychological war against the Taiwanese people, and an intelligence war against Taiwan's intelligence agencies. This is a new wave of Chinese propaganda and military threats.
China has held four press conferences to announce Taiwanese espionage cases since late last year. The number of spies mentioned at these press conferences has ranged from 21 to seven, leaving us confused. Even more bizarre, the seven names publicized by Beijing Wednesday are the same as those mentioned by former New Party legislator Elmer Feng (馮滬祥) at a press conference last Friday. No wonder some say Beijing and Feng are working together.
The cross-strait situation has become very tense since former president Lee Teng-hui's (
The reports that the seven businessmen arrested by China have been prying into military matters and that Taiwan's MIB has obtained information from them may very well be false, or even the result of forced confessions.
China does not respect human rights. Any careless act by a Taiwanese businessman might be considered espionage. It is not very strange that Taiwanese officials and intelligence agencies have reacted by saying that this is all a political scheme by China aimed at helping the pan-blue camp attack President Chen Shui-bian (
Apart from the obvious political manipulation aimed at assisting the pan-blue camp's accusation that Chen's announcement of the number and location of China's ballistic missiles helped betray the identity of Taiwan's spies, there is also a behind-the-scenes cross-strait intelligence war going on. Late last year, military investigators cracked a case involving Chinese espionage in Taiwan's military intelligence system, and a network of Chinese spies in Taiwan.
There are complex motives behind China's disclosure of information about Taiwanese spies, including code names, aliases, salaries and contacts in the MIB. Laying the spy case so bare is an obvious display of force. Only the intelligence personnel on the two sides know the truth.
On one hand, Chinese President Hu Jintao (
The cross-strait political standoff and confrontation do nothing to ease the tensions caused by the spy case. If Beijing really is sincere about resolving the problem, it should allow members of ARATS and Taiwan's Straits Exchange Foundation (
Engaging in a war of words will only aggravate the situation. The best way to allay tension is to initiate dialogue and negotiations.
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
As an American living in Taiwan, I have to confess how impressed I have been over the years by the Chinese Communist Party’s wholehearted embrace of high-speed rail and electric vehicles, and this at a time when my own democratic country has chosen a leader openly committed to doing everything in his power to put obstacles in the way of sustainable energy across the board — and democracy to boot. It really does make me wonder: “Are those of us right who hold that democracy is the right way to go?” Has Taiwan made the wrong choice? Many in China obviously
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
Last week, 24 Republican representatives in the US Congress proposed a resolution calling for US President Donald Trump’s administration to abandon the US’ “one China” policy, calling it outdated, counterproductive and not reflective of reality, and to restore official diplomatic relations with Taiwan, enter bilateral free-trade agreement negotiations and support its entry into international organizations. That is an exciting and inspiring development. To help the US government and other nations further understand that Taiwan is not a part of China, that those “one China” policies are contrary to the fact that the two countries across the Taiwan Strait are independent and
RSS