China's national security agencies announced Thursday that they have arrested another Taiwanese "spy." They also announced details of "spy" cases involving Taiwanese businesspeople operating in China and their addresses in Taiwan, and have invited Taiwanese journalists to interview these "Taiwanese spies."
The Chinese government has handled these spy cases in a sensationalistic way -- as Iraq did in publicizing photographs of war prisoners -- to initiate a psychological war against the Taiwanese people, and an intelligence war against Taiwan's intelligence agencies. This is a new wave of Chinese propaganda and military threats.
China has held four press conferences to announce Taiwanese espionage cases since late last year. The number of spies mentioned at these press conferences has ranged from 21 to seven, leaving us confused. Even more bizarre, the seven names publicized by Beijing Wednesday are the same as those mentioned by former New Party legislator Elmer Feng (馮滬祥) at a press conference last Friday. No wonder some say Beijing and Feng are working together.
The cross-strait situation has become very tense since former president Lee Teng-hui's (
The reports that the seven businessmen arrested by China have been prying into military matters and that Taiwan's MIB has obtained information from them may very well be false, or even the result of forced confessions.
China does not respect human rights. Any careless act by a Taiwanese businessman might be considered espionage. It is not very strange that Taiwanese officials and intelligence agencies have reacted by saying that this is all a political scheme by China aimed at helping the pan-blue camp attack President Chen Shui-bian (
Apart from the obvious political manipulation aimed at assisting the pan-blue camp's accusation that Chen's announcement of the number and location of China's ballistic missiles helped betray the identity of Taiwan's spies, there is also a behind-the-scenes cross-strait intelligence war going on. Late last year, military investigators cracked a case involving Chinese espionage in Taiwan's military intelligence system, and a network of Chinese spies in Taiwan.
There are complex motives behind China's disclosure of information about Taiwanese spies, including code names, aliases, salaries and contacts in the MIB. Laying the spy case so bare is an obvious display of force. Only the intelligence personnel on the two sides know the truth.
On one hand, Chinese President Hu Jintao (
The cross-strait political standoff and confrontation do nothing to ease the tensions caused by the spy case. If Beijing really is sincere about resolving the problem, it should allow members of ARATS and Taiwan's Straits Exchange Foundation (
Engaging in a war of words will only aggravate the situation. The best way to allay tension is to initiate dialogue and negotiations.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS