President Chen Shui-bian's (
In fact, those exerting internal and external pressure are like a pack of wolves howling at the moon because they cannot touch it.
The moon is the status quo.
"Changing the status quo" is the phrase that those exerting pressure care most about. But what is the status quo?
The US has made the maintenance of the status quo its top priority and opposed any unilateral attempt to change the status quo. The US demands that Taiwan avoid provoking China or making any move toward independence; it also demands that China not use military force against Taiwan.
If we look at this policy as a set of scales, we can see that the scales have never been level to begin with.
There is also the problem that balance is dynamic -- it never stays put for very long.
US policy is based on the three Sino-US communiques and the Taiwan Relations Act. But the scales have tipped gradually in China's favor in the long evolution of the communiques, highlighting the US' tendency toward imbalance in its cross-strait policy.
China has risen as a power in international politics. Using its political, diplomatic and economic power, China has become a leading force in Asia. For Taiwan, China's threat is very deep, as are its attempts to isolate Taiwan diplomatically.
On the military front, China has continued to build its military power and has aimed almost 500 ballistic missiles at Taiwan.
In economics, China has continued to suck away Taiwanese capital and vitality, causing Taiwan's economy to shrink.
The cross-strait center line has been squeezing in on Taiwan, on the political, military and economic fronts. Ignoring this shift and demanding the maintenance of the status quo is as impractical as marking the place on your ship's hull where your sword dropped into the sea, in the hope of retrieving the sword.
The US hopes the two sides will move toward dialogue, but Beijing has set the "one China" condition for any dialogue -- basically demanding Taiwan's surrender before sitting down at the negotiation table. This is not fair. The US demands that Chen keep his "five noes" promise but pays no heed to the premise of his promise -- that China must not threaten Taiwan militarily.
Now China is not only making such threats, but also views any referendum or rewriting of Taiwan's Constitution as provocative. Even a Taiwanese complaint about Chinese missiles has become provocative. This is even more unfair.
China has every reason to maintain a status quo that contains so many things that are absurd and unfair to Taiwan. Under this status quo, China can increase its missile deployments against Taiwan, block Taiwan's entry into international organizations and force other countries to accept Beijing's unilateral definition of provocation.
Taiwan's March 20 referendum is not going to change the status quo. It is merely a loud objection against what is unfair in the status quo so that people both at home and abroad may pay heed.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS