President Chen Shui-bian's (
In fact, those exerting internal and external pressure are like a pack of wolves howling at the moon because they cannot touch it.
The moon is the status quo.
"Changing the status quo" is the phrase that those exerting pressure care most about. But what is the status quo?
The US has made the maintenance of the status quo its top priority and opposed any unilateral attempt to change the status quo. The US demands that Taiwan avoid provoking China or making any move toward independence; it also demands that China not use military force against Taiwan.
If we look at this policy as a set of scales, we can see that the scales have never been level to begin with.
There is also the problem that balance is dynamic -- it never stays put for very long.
US policy is based on the three Sino-US communiques and the Taiwan Relations Act. But the scales have tipped gradually in China's favor in the long evolution of the communiques, highlighting the US' tendency toward imbalance in its cross-strait policy.
China has risen as a power in international politics. Using its political, diplomatic and economic power, China has become a leading force in Asia. For Taiwan, China's threat is very deep, as are its attempts to isolate Taiwan diplomatically.
On the military front, China has continued to build its military power and has aimed almost 500 ballistic missiles at Taiwan.
In economics, China has continued to suck away Taiwanese capital and vitality, causing Taiwan's economy to shrink.
The cross-strait center line has been squeezing in on Taiwan, on the political, military and economic fronts. Ignoring this shift and demanding the maintenance of the status quo is as impractical as marking the place on your ship's hull where your sword dropped into the sea, in the hope of retrieving the sword.
The US hopes the two sides will move toward dialogue, but Beijing has set the "one China" condition for any dialogue -- basically demanding Taiwan's surrender before sitting down at the negotiation table. This is not fair. The US demands that Chen keep his "five noes" promise but pays no heed to the premise of his promise -- that China must not threaten Taiwan militarily.
Now China is not only making such threats, but also views any referendum or rewriting of Taiwan's Constitution as provocative. Even a Taiwanese complaint about Chinese missiles has become provocative. This is even more unfair.
China has every reason to maintain a status quo that contains so many things that are absurd and unfair to Taiwan. Under this status quo, China can increase its missile deployments against Taiwan, block Taiwan's entry into international organizations and force other countries to accept Beijing's unilateral definition of provocation.
Taiwan's March 20 referendum is not going to change the status quo. It is merely a loud objection against what is unfair in the status quo so that people both at home and abroad may pay heed.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS