On Dec. 27, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Lien Chan (
The Apple Daily ran an article by independent Legislator Sisy Chen (陳文茜) entitled "Unprecedented." She wrote: "The whole country has gone crazy, reaching unprecedented levels of craziness! China is showing unprecedented unity, the US is showing unprecedented unwillingness to send soldiers to protect Taiwan and Taiwan is showing unprecedented levels of daring."
The whole country has not, in fact, gone crazy. China does not show unprecedented levels of unity, nor does the US show unprecedented unwillingness to send soldiers to protect Taiwan.
Chen was right on one count only: Taiwan really does show unprecedented levels of daring. Why? Because the country hasn't gone crazy, it just doesn't believe in the crazy ramblings of lunatics.
First, on Dec. 9, US President George W. Bush told Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao (溫家寶): "Look, you know, if you force us to, if you try to use force or coercion against the Taiwanese, we're going to be there." Can the will to protect Taiwan be expressed any clearer than that?
On the same occasion, Bush also warned Taiwan that the US opposes any statements or actions by Taiwan's leaders that may lead to a change in the status quo. Taiwan's representative to the US, Chen Chien-jen (
The US' position is very simple. Of the three kinds of referendum discussed, the US has no problem with topics related to domestic matters. However, it opposes any poll that would change the status quo. Nor does it support fuzzy or ineffective referendums.
The problem is that the US cannot understand why Taiwan would hold an ineffective referendum if it doesn't plan to change the status quo. "What are you guys up to," they are thinking, "and what's next?"
The US wants Taiwan to think things through and be clear. And, indeed, Taiwan needs to do just this.
Second, China is not showing unprecedented levels of unity, and it is not so united that the most serious prospect of war in 50 years can be brought about.
What does this mean, this "50 years?" Recall the 1954 artillery attack, or the Chinese occupation of Ichiangshan Island in 1955 which resulted in the deaths of 720 Nationalist soldiers, or the KMT's retreat from the Tachen islands, or the Battle of the Taiwan Strait on Aug. 23, 1958, or the severing of diplomatic ties with the US in 1979, or even the "test" missiles that landed off Keelung and Kaohsiung in 1996. Is the current situation really more serious than all of these?
During Bush's meeting with Wen, the Chinese premier approved of Bush clearly stating his opposition to either China or Taiwan unilaterally changing the status quo, indicating that China's new leadership is more pragmatic than under previous Chinese president Jiang Zemin (江澤民) and premier Zhu Rongji (朱鎔基). Wen discovered that using arms or threats to change the status quo is not in the interests of China. Attempts by Lien Chan and Sisy Chen to exploit China's military threat by instilling the fear of war in the Taiwanese public is doomed to fail.
Third, Taiwan's international outlook and view of China are indeed encouraging. Looking back eight or nine years, there was another "lunatic" on the loose, one by the name of Cheng Lang-ping (鄭浪平). He wrote a book called T Day in 1994, which also sought to instill fear. At the time, his crazy ramblings frightened quite a few people, some to the extent that they left the country. Even the defense minister was duped. He wrote a foreword and made the book recommended reading for soldiers. With the help of China's propaganda offensive, the military threat and missile exercises, the stock market fell 4,000 points.
Cheng's book frightened many people, but despite Lien and Chen warming up their propaganda machinery, the people of Taiwan fear nothing. Consider this a lesson in how fast the Taiwanese public have learned to differentiate between truth and lies.
Eight or nine years of democratic progress has made the whole nation understand that when looking at the international community or at China, one has to rely on one's own experience and draw conclusions from that experience with a free mind and an independent spirit. We no longer believe in the crazy ramblings of would-be foreigners and self-appointed China specialists.
Instilling the fear of war is a crime of sorts in civilized countries, because it violates one of the four great freedoms -- the freedom from fear. I hope that the new year will be one in which democracy progresses still further in Taiwan, a year when the nation can bid farewell to fear, lunatics and liars instilling the fear of war, and a year of rapid progress toward freedom, glory, peace and rationality.
Ruan Ming is a visiting professor at Tamkang University and was a special assistant to Hu Yaobang (
Translated by Perry Svensson
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS