On Dec. 27, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Lien Chan (
The Apple Daily ran an article by independent Legislator Sisy Chen (陳文茜) entitled "Unprecedented." She wrote: "The whole country has gone crazy, reaching unprecedented levels of craziness! China is showing unprecedented unity, the US is showing unprecedented unwillingness to send soldiers to protect Taiwan and Taiwan is showing unprecedented levels of daring."
The whole country has not, in fact, gone crazy. China does not show unprecedented levels of unity, nor does the US show unprecedented unwillingness to send soldiers to protect Taiwan.
Chen was right on one count only: Taiwan really does show unprecedented levels of daring. Why? Because the country hasn't gone crazy, it just doesn't believe in the crazy ramblings of lunatics.
First, on Dec. 9, US President George W. Bush told Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao (溫家寶): "Look, you know, if you force us to, if you try to use force or coercion against the Taiwanese, we're going to be there." Can the will to protect Taiwan be expressed any clearer than that?
On the same occasion, Bush also warned Taiwan that the US opposes any statements or actions by Taiwan's leaders that may lead to a change in the status quo. Taiwan's representative to the US, Chen Chien-jen (
The US' position is very simple. Of the three kinds of referendum discussed, the US has no problem with topics related to domestic matters. However, it opposes any poll that would change the status quo. Nor does it support fuzzy or ineffective referendums.
The problem is that the US cannot understand why Taiwan would hold an ineffective referendum if it doesn't plan to change the status quo. "What are you guys up to," they are thinking, "and what's next?"
The US wants Taiwan to think things through and be clear. And, indeed, Taiwan needs to do just this.
Second, China is not showing unprecedented levels of unity, and it is not so united that the most serious prospect of war in 50 years can be brought about.
What does this mean, this "50 years?" Recall the 1954 artillery attack, or the Chinese occupation of Ichiangshan Island in 1955 which resulted in the deaths of 720 Nationalist soldiers, or the KMT's retreat from the Tachen islands, or the Battle of the Taiwan Strait on Aug. 23, 1958, or the severing of diplomatic ties with the US in 1979, or even the "test" missiles that landed off Keelung and Kaohsiung in 1996. Is the current situation really more serious than all of these?
During Bush's meeting with Wen, the Chinese premier approved of Bush clearly stating his opposition to either China or Taiwan unilaterally changing the status quo, indicating that China's new leadership is more pragmatic than under previous Chinese president Jiang Zemin (江澤民) and premier Zhu Rongji (朱鎔基). Wen discovered that using arms or threats to change the status quo is not in the interests of China. Attempts by Lien Chan and Sisy Chen to exploit China's military threat by instilling the fear of war in the Taiwanese public is doomed to fail.
Third, Taiwan's international outlook and view of China are indeed encouraging. Looking back eight or nine years, there was another "lunatic" on the loose, one by the name of Cheng Lang-ping (鄭浪平). He wrote a book called T Day in 1994, which also sought to instill fear. At the time, his crazy ramblings frightened quite a few people, some to the extent that they left the country. Even the defense minister was duped. He wrote a foreword and made the book recommended reading for soldiers. With the help of China's propaganda offensive, the military threat and missile exercises, the stock market fell 4,000 points.
Cheng's book frightened many people, but despite Lien and Chen warming up their propaganda machinery, the people of Taiwan fear nothing. Consider this a lesson in how fast the Taiwanese public have learned to differentiate between truth and lies.
Eight or nine years of democratic progress has made the whole nation understand that when looking at the international community or at China, one has to rely on one's own experience and draw conclusions from that experience with a free mind and an independent spirit. We no longer believe in the crazy ramblings of would-be foreigners and self-appointed China specialists.
Instilling the fear of war is a crime of sorts in civilized countries, because it violates one of the four great freedoms -- the freedom from fear. I hope that the new year will be one in which democracy progresses still further in Taiwan, a year when the nation can bid farewell to fear, lunatics and liars instilling the fear of war, and a year of rapid progress toward freedom, glory, peace and rationality.
Ruan Ming is a visiting professor at Tamkang University and was a special assistant to Hu Yaobang (
Translated by Perry Svensson
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS