Fourteen years ago, after the Tiananmen Square incident, the Chinese communist authorities purged the activists and blamed "KMT secret agents" for the democratic protest. At that time, I wrote an article in the Capital Morning Post. I said in the article:
"The strife between the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has resulted in many `bandit spies' (匪諜) and `KMT secret agents' (國特). The KMT refers to CCP secret agents as `bandit spies,' while the CCP calls those sent by the KMT `KMT secret agents.'
Over the past 40 years, the KMT has caught many `bandit spies' and the CCP has captured many `KMT secret agents.' Some of course were real spies, while many others were not.
The KMT awarded the `bandit spy' title to dissidents or those it felt uncomfortable with. It was a convenient excuse to arrest people and put them away. The other trick the KMT used was to post a `bandit spy' near someone it wanted to arrest so it could accuse him or her of not reporting the spy.
"Similarly, the CCP has created many fake KMT secret agents to purge dissidents. It blamed the KMT for the Tiananmen Square incident and arrested many `KMT secret agents' who had allegedly incited people to rise up in rebellion. The KMT and the CCP have in fact helped each other with excuses to do away with dissidents so as to solidify their power. Their symbiotic relationship can be seen from this."
That was what I wrote 14 years ago. Today the KMT is no longer in a position to make up stories about bandit spies, but the CCP has not stopped using the method. The only difference is that the "KMT secret agents" are now called "Taiwanese spies" (
In the past, the KMT used the CCP to level false charges against dissidents. It was a dirty trick, but it still made some sense. Now the party is blaming President Chen Shui-bian (
It is a widely known fact that China has deployed more than 400 missiles along the coast pointing at Taiwan. So I was not surprised at all when Chen announced that there were, in fact, 496 missiles, since this number was not far from what we had already known.
The pan-blue politicians, however, seized the opportunity to criticize Chen for leaking military secrets, a move that could kill "our intelligence personnel."
I was surprised to hear that. When did these pro-China politicians, who asked us not to irritate China, start caring about "our intelligence personnel"?
Aren't the pan-blues worried that they would irritate China by pointing out that so many of "our intelligence personnel" are working in China?
They accused Chen of leaking military secrets by disclosing the number of missiles. But in my opinion, they were the ones leaking military secrets regarding the fact that we had so many agents working in China. After all, if Chen unveiled any military secrets, they were China's military secrets, while the secrets the pan-blue politicians revealed were Taiwan's.
In view of the noises made by the pan-KMT politicians, Beijing would of course cooperate by creating a few stories about "Taiwanese spies."
And that's exactly what happened. Taiwanese businesspeople in China disappeared.
Pan-blue politicians and the pro-China media again seized the chance to blame Chen as if their prophecy had come true.
Businesspeople disappear in China every year.
No disappearances happened as a result of Chen's disclosure.
The pan-KMT group did not condemn the Chinese communist authorities for trampling human rights and the rule of law.
Instead, it used the spy case as an excuse to attack the Chen administration. I do not know how to look at the party anymore. In the past, they got rid of dissidents with Chinese bandit spy stories; now, they still use China's dictatorship to fight against their political rivals. It is another kind of cooperation between the KMT and the CCP.
I feel sorry for some ignorant and servile Taiwanese people who believe in the propaganda of the old forces. Aren't they afraid of China's ridicule and the censure of their future generations?
Lee Shiao-feng is a professor at Shih Hsin University.
Translated by Jennie Shih
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS