On Wednesday, less than three weeks before the Lunar New Year holiday, Pu Zhaozhou (
Pu suggested an arrangement under which flights would travel without stopping in cities such as Hong Kong and Macau -- but only in one direction -- from Taipei to a handful of cities in China.
According to Pu, this proposal comes with the condition that next year the charter flights will fly direct in both directions.
Anyone who has been paying attention to the cross-strait deadlock over direct links can see that this offer is riddled with many tricks. The deadlock has come about because China insists on Taiwan's acceptance of the "one China" principle as a condition of any official cross-strait talks on direct links.
The alternative would be to skip official negotiations between the governments, and leave talks in the hands of authorized private groups. The latter option is no different from the former because by skipping formal negotiations between governments, Taiwan would be conceding that cross-strait direct links are domestic links and that Taiwan is merely a "province" of "one China."
After all, no international air links can be launched without involving the governments in question, because doing so would mean flying into foreign territories without authorization and violating sovereignty.
The arrangement under which cross-strait charter flights were made last year did not have these problems. Not only were the flights one-way -- Taipei to Shanghai, which incurred virtually no security risk for Taiwan -- but even more importantly, while there were no changes of aircraft between Taipei and Shanghai, the planes were still required to make stops in places such as Hong Kong and Macao.
So long as flights remained indirect, there was no sovereignty issue involved, and skipping government negotiation was possible.
The proposal made by Beijing this year asks for "direct flights" from Taipei to several Chinese cities without any stopovers. This is something that would require negotiations between governments.
Obviously, if Taiwan accepts one-way direct flights without negotiations this year, then it will have no reason to demand negotiations over two-way direct flights next year.
Bluntly put, this is simply Beijing's way of trying to trick Taiwan into direct links under the "one China" principle.
This seeming "concession" offered by Beijing is no concession at all.
Statements made by Zhang Mingqing (
Zhang on the one hand harshly criticized President Chen Shui-bian's (
Obviously, after the arrests of Taiwanese businessmen on espionage charges recently, Beijing has decided to take steps to ease the fears of the Taiwanese business community.
This new proposal on chartered flights -- unlikely to become reality -- is simply another one of Beijing's gestures to make amends.
In September 2015, Russia intervened militarily in Syria’s civil war, propping up Bashar al-Assad’s dictatorship as it teetered on the brink of collapse. This was the high point of Russia’s resurgence on the world stage and Russian President Vladimir Putin’s ability to tilt the war in al-Assad’s favor helped make him a regional power broker. In addition to enhancing Putin’s stature, the operation led to strategic gains that gave Russia leverage vis-a-vis regional and Western powers. Syria was thus a status symbol for the Kremlin. Putin, who sees Russia as a great power on par with the US and China, attaches
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers on Monday unilaterally passed a preliminary review of proposed amendments to the Public Officers Election and Recall Act (公職人員選罷法) in just one minute, while Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators, government officials and the media were locked out. The hasty and discourteous move — the doors of the Internal Administration Committee chamber were locked and sealed with plastic wrap before the preliminary review meeting began — was a great setback for Taiwan’s democracy. Without any legislative discussion or public witnesses, KMT Legislator Hsu Hsin-ying (徐欣瑩), the committee’s convener, began the meeting at 9am and announced passage of the
In the weeks following the 2024 US presidential election, I have received one question more than any other from friends in Taiwan — how will Donald J. Trump’s return to the White House affect Taiwan and cross-Strait relations? Some Taiwan counterparts have argued that Trump hates China, so therefore he will support Taiwan, according to the logic that the enemy of one’s enemy is a friend. Others have expressed anxiety that Trump will put pressure on Taiwan to dramatically increase defense spending, or to compensate the United States for allegedly “stealing” America’s semiconductor sector. While I understand these hopes and concerns, I
With Washington substantially off-guard in power transition, China’s supreme leader, Xi Jinping (習近平), is intensifying an anti-corruption campaign against the top military leadership. At a glance, the move seems to be consistent with his emphasis on the necessity of enhancing military preparedness for a possible full military invasion of Taiwan, because the military is required to be well-disciplined without corruption. Looking carefully, however, a series of purges of several top military leaders since last year begs the question of what dynamics has worked behind the anomaly. More specifically, general Wei Fenghe (魏鳳和) and his immediate successor, Li Shangfu (李尚福), were removed as People’s
RSS