On Wednesday, less than three weeks before the Lunar New Year holiday, Pu Zhaozhou (
Pu suggested an arrangement under which flights would travel without stopping in cities such as Hong Kong and Macau -- but only in one direction -- from Taipei to a handful of cities in China.
According to Pu, this proposal comes with the condition that next year the charter flights will fly direct in both directions.
Anyone who has been paying attention to the cross-strait deadlock over direct links can see that this offer is riddled with many tricks. The deadlock has come about because China insists on Taiwan's acceptance of the "one China" principle as a condition of any official cross-strait talks on direct links.
The alternative would be to skip official negotiations between the governments, and leave talks in the hands of authorized private groups. The latter option is no different from the former because by skipping formal negotiations between governments, Taiwan would be conceding that cross-strait direct links are domestic links and that Taiwan is merely a "province" of "one China."
After all, no international air links can be launched without involving the governments in question, because doing so would mean flying into foreign territories without authorization and violating sovereignty.
The arrangement under which cross-strait charter flights were made last year did not have these problems. Not only were the flights one-way -- Taipei to Shanghai, which incurred virtually no security risk for Taiwan -- but even more importantly, while there were no changes of aircraft between Taipei and Shanghai, the planes were still required to make stops in places such as Hong Kong and Macao.
So long as flights remained indirect, there was no sovereignty issue involved, and skipping government negotiation was possible.
The proposal made by Beijing this year asks for "direct flights" from Taipei to several Chinese cities without any stopovers. This is something that would require negotiations between governments.
Obviously, if Taiwan accepts one-way direct flights without negotiations this year, then it will have no reason to demand negotiations over two-way direct flights next year.
Bluntly put, this is simply Beijing's way of trying to trick Taiwan into direct links under the "one China" principle.
This seeming "concession" offered by Beijing is no concession at all.
Statements made by Zhang Mingqing (
Zhang on the one hand harshly criticized President Chen Shui-bian's (
Obviously, after the arrests of Taiwanese businessmen on espionage charges recently, Beijing has decided to take steps to ease the fears of the Taiwanese business community.
This new proposal on chartered flights -- unlikely to become reality -- is simply another one of Beijing's gestures to make amends.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS