To curry favor with Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao (
Wen responded on the spot -- as if he had received an invaluable treasure -- that he appreciated Bush's position. However, Bush was questioned in the US for kowtowing to communist China by sacrificing democratic Taiwan.
His remarks caused a greater uproar here, as the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) said that "President Chen Shui-bian's (
Self-interest has blinded the KMT.
First, the US has not changed its policy. It has only made it clearer. During a press briefing on Dec. 9, a White House official said that Washington does not want to continue the game of keeping an ambiguous policy anymore. Bush clearly told Wen that "we are going to be there" if Beijing attacks Taiwan by force. He especially pointed out that Bush's promise in April 2001 that he would do whatever it takes to help Taiwan defend itself remains unchanged.
The US also told Taiwan that Washington will not abandon its support for democracy and freedom in Taiwan. But it does not welcome any action by Taiwan that might change the status quo -- because its ultimate goal is to maintain peace across the Taiwan Strait.
Next, China's goal of annexing Taiwan remains unchanged, although its methods have changed. Wen himself reiterated Beijing's policy of "peaceful unification" and the "one country, two systems" model. Unlike former Chinese President Jiang Zemin (
Originally, Beijing had hoped that Bush could return to former US president Bill Clinton's "three noes" policy or announce opposition to Taiwanese independence. But Bush didn't do so, because that would be a real change in US policy. In fact, the country that really wants to change the status quo is China. Bush's comment against Chen was in fact empty talk.
Last, the problem in fact lies in Taiwan, which has neither knowledge of nor confidence in itself. Taiwan is already an independent democratic country, and does not have to change its status at all. It should continue its democratic development and should not be afraid of any external threats. Didn't Wen also say at the White House that Beijing respects the Taiwanese people's wish for democracy? Whether he was telling a lie or playing a trick, will he really dare to attack Taiwan by force?
Referendums are appeals to direct democracy to resolve significant domestic disagreements that the Legislative Yuan cannot resolve. Taiwan's political circles are trapped in a vicious battle over independence, and are very careless about the nation's democratic development.
Politicians should return to reason, and give up their vicious political struggles, so as to appropriately design both the referendum and constitutional systems in accordance with Taiwan's democratic development and the people's will.
Ruan Ming is a visiting professor at Tamkang University and a former special assistant to late general secretary of the Chinese Communist Party Hu Yaobang (
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS