The collapse of talks on the EU's first constitution leaves the bloc lurching toward a "big bang" enlargement next year with dysfunctional institutions in a mood of crisis and division.
Failure to agree at a weekend summit on a charter designed to ensure the EU can run efficiently after 10 new members join the existing 15 next May, means the Union's expansion beyond the old Iron Curtain is likely to be overshadowed by acrimony.
France and Germany, blocked in their bid for more voting power by Spain and Poland, responded by threatening to lead "pioneer groups" of like-minded countries towards closer integration, raising the prospect of a two-speed Europe.
ILLUSTRATION MOUNTAIN PEOPLE
"The first few years of enlargement are going to be a very rocky ride," said Heather Grabbe, deputy director of the Centre for European Reform.
"This was a time when the Union needed to be strong, but it will actually be divided and weak, concentrating on battles over money, jobs and power," she said.
Saturday's breakdown capped a year in which the EU split bitterly over the US-led war in Iraq, its budget rules were bent, Sweden voted against joining the euro and Britain decided not even to put the choice to its skeptical voters.
The defining moment of this year may well have been when French President Jacques Chirac chided the EU's east European newcomers in February for siding with the US over Iraq, saying they had "missed a good opportunity to shut up."
Diplomats said animosity and mutual distrust among leaders, who put their national interest above any sense of a common European goal, was a factor in the collapse of the constitution negotiations and augurs ill for next year's big challenges.
Two years' work on a constitution, drafted by a Convention of lawmakers and national representatives led by former French president Valery Giscard d'Estaing, ended in a deadlock that will tarnish the EU's image with its citizens and in the world.
The unresolved struggle over voting rights is bound to become entwined with a looming battle over the next EU budget and will overhang the appointment of a new European Commission and the election of a new European Parliament next year.
After failing to secure more voting power for the EU's most populous state, German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder said Germany wanted the ceiling on the 2007 to 2013 budget reduced to 1 percent of gross national income (GNI), from 1.27 percent at present.
Although the EU's current 100 billion euro annual budget only amounts to one percent of GNI, such a tight corset would leave no extra cash to meet the huge development needs of the less wealthy new member states.
The EU was always likely to face strains digesting 10 new countries that will swell its population from 375 to 450 million and most leaders chose to play down the severity of the crisis they had unleashed on Saturday.
Britain said life would go on and the EU would simply apply the 2000 Nice treaty, which gave Spain and Poland almost as many votes as Germany, with twice their population.
But most experts doubt whether that rulebook, so complex and flawed that EU leaders sought to rewrite it almost before the ink was dry, can keep an enlarged Union moving forward.
"This EU of 25 or 27 cannot really work with the Treaty of Nice," said Daniel Gros, director of the Center for European Policy Studies in Brussels.
Chirac said "pioneer groups" could move ahead in the fields of economics, defense, crime-fighting and immigration, as they had done to launch the euro single currency and the Schengen border-free area within the EU.
Founders France, Germany, Belgium and Luxembourg are exploring joint initiatives with a core of like-minded states, diplomats say. But many analysts doubt how far this will lead.
"This core Europe stuff is a pipe dream," Gros said, arguing that Paris and Berlin had forfeited much trust as leaders of the European project after they trampled on EU budget rules last month to avoid disciplinary action for their excessive deficits.
The leaders set no date to resume constitution negotiations, leaving a cooling-off period likely to extend beyond a Spanish general election in March and European elections in June.
Schroeder and Chirac may hope the financial leverage of the budget talks will force Spain and Poland to sue for peace on voting rights by 2005, but in such a poisoned atmosphere, that seems far from certain.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS