The collapse of talks on the EU's first constitution leaves the bloc lurching toward a "big bang" enlargement next year with dysfunctional institutions in a mood of crisis and division.
Failure to agree at a weekend summit on a charter designed to ensure the EU can run efficiently after 10 new members join the existing 15 next May, means the Union's expansion beyond the old Iron Curtain is likely to be overshadowed by acrimony.
France and Germany, blocked in their bid for more voting power by Spain and Poland, responded by threatening to lead "pioneer groups" of like-minded countries towards closer integration, raising the prospect of a two-speed Europe.
ILLUSTRATION MOUNTAIN PEOPLE
"The first few years of enlargement are going to be a very rocky ride," said Heather Grabbe, deputy director of the Centre for European Reform.
"This was a time when the Union needed to be strong, but it will actually be divided and weak, concentrating on battles over money, jobs and power," she said.
Saturday's breakdown capped a year in which the EU split bitterly over the US-led war in Iraq, its budget rules were bent, Sweden voted against joining the euro and Britain decided not even to put the choice to its skeptical voters.
The defining moment of this year may well have been when French President Jacques Chirac chided the EU's east European newcomers in February for siding with the US over Iraq, saying they had "missed a good opportunity to shut up."
Diplomats said animosity and mutual distrust among leaders, who put their national interest above any sense of a common European goal, was a factor in the collapse of the constitution negotiations and augurs ill for next year's big challenges.
Two years' work on a constitution, drafted by a Convention of lawmakers and national representatives led by former French president Valery Giscard d'Estaing, ended in a deadlock that will tarnish the EU's image with its citizens and in the world.
The unresolved struggle over voting rights is bound to become entwined with a looming battle over the next EU budget and will overhang the appointment of a new European Commission and the election of a new European Parliament next year.
After failing to secure more voting power for the EU's most populous state, German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder said Germany wanted the ceiling on the 2007 to 2013 budget reduced to 1 percent of gross national income (GNI), from 1.27 percent at present.
Although the EU's current 100 billion euro annual budget only amounts to one percent of GNI, such a tight corset would leave no extra cash to meet the huge development needs of the less wealthy new member states.
The EU was always likely to face strains digesting 10 new countries that will swell its population from 375 to 450 million and most leaders chose to play down the severity of the crisis they had unleashed on Saturday.
Britain said life would go on and the EU would simply apply the 2000 Nice treaty, which gave Spain and Poland almost as many votes as Germany, with twice their population.
But most experts doubt whether that rulebook, so complex and flawed that EU leaders sought to rewrite it almost before the ink was dry, can keep an enlarged Union moving forward.
"This EU of 25 or 27 cannot really work with the Treaty of Nice," said Daniel Gros, director of the Center for European Policy Studies in Brussels.
Chirac said "pioneer groups" could move ahead in the fields of economics, defense, crime-fighting and immigration, as they had done to launch the euro single currency and the Schengen border-free area within the EU.
Founders France, Germany, Belgium and Luxembourg are exploring joint initiatives with a core of like-minded states, diplomats say. But many analysts doubt how far this will lead.
"This core Europe stuff is a pipe dream," Gros said, arguing that Paris and Berlin had forfeited much trust as leaders of the European project after they trampled on EU budget rules last month to avoid disciplinary action for their excessive deficits.
The leaders set no date to resume constitution negotiations, leaving a cooling-off period likely to extend beyond a Spanish general election in March and European elections in June.
Schroeder and Chirac may hope the financial leverage of the budget talks will force Spain and Poland to sue for peace on voting rights by 2005, but in such a poisoned atmosphere, that seems far from certain.
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
Last week, 24 Republican representatives in the US Congress proposed a resolution calling for US President Donald Trump’s administration to abandon the US’ “one China” policy, calling it outdated, counterproductive and not reflective of reality, and to restore official diplomatic relations with Taiwan, enter bilateral free-trade agreement negotiations and support its entry into international organizations. That is an exciting and inspiring development. To help the US government and other nations further understand that Taiwan is not a part of China, that those “one China” policies are contrary to the fact that the two countries across the Taiwan Strait are independent and
RSS