President Chen Shui-bian (
Beijing, however, has decided that holding a defensive referendum means moving towards independence. Many party and government officials, therefore, issue statements criticizing and warning Chen, and they are also exerting heavy pressure on Washington to "deal with" Taiwan's referendum measures.
In response to pressure from China, officials from the US State Department and National Security Council have on several occasions over the past week expressed their concern over the defensive referendum. The State Department has unambiguously said that the US opposes a unification-independence referendum.
In fact, the US government understands Chen's repeated guarantees, and it also understands that a defensive referendum will not involve unification-independence or the "five noes," but in order to calm Beijing, Washington has to make a few harsh statements aimed at Taipei.
China has learned its lesson and currently uses the US to deal with Taiwan. In the belief that the road from Beijing to Taipei leads through Washington, they have kicked the ball over to the Americans. US officials therefore use various moralistic ways of persuading Taiwan in order to let Beijing see that they indeed have worked hard to deal with Taipei. At the same time, the US worries that Beijing (particularly the military hardliners) will force President Hu Jintao (
The US has, on several occasions, stated that it opposes Chinese use of armed force to solve the conflict with Taiwan. It has also made some preventive assessments of a few possible radical actions by Beijing, and it will have various scenarios prepared in response to a Chinese concentration of arms in southern China, military exercises, or armed threats against Taiwan.
Have the Americans not heard Taiwan's repeated explanations to Washington? We believe that American diplomats shall use various channels to explain to the White House, Congress and public that a defensive referendum is aimed at promoting and deepening Taiwanese democracy. Although the Referendum Law (
We want to make the Taiwanese public understand that a defensive referendum is necessary for the security of the nation. China has almost 500 missiles aimed at this country. Can we pretend that they do not exist? One of the topics for the defensive referendum is to make the public clarify whether or not they approve of China's removing theses missiles.
Beijing constantly belittles Taiwan, and wants to make it a special administrative region like Hong Kong or Macau. Another topic for the defensive referendum is allowing people to express whether they approve of Beijing's "one country, two systems" model.
A clarification of the public's position on these topics would be persuasive in strengthening national security by making the international community understand that Taiwan does not want to be threatened by, or be part of, China.
Parris Chang is a Democratic Progressive Party legislator.
Translated by Perry Svensson
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS