President Chen Shui-bian (
Beijing, however, has decided that holding a defensive referendum means moving towards independence. Many party and government officials, therefore, issue statements criticizing and warning Chen, and they are also exerting heavy pressure on Washington to "deal with" Taiwan's referendum measures.
In response to pressure from China, officials from the US State Department and National Security Council have on several occasions over the past week expressed their concern over the defensive referendum. The State Department has unambiguously said that the US opposes a unification-independence referendum.
In fact, the US government understands Chen's repeated guarantees, and it also understands that a defensive referendum will not involve unification-independence or the "five noes," but in order to calm Beijing, Washington has to make a few harsh statements aimed at Taipei.
China has learned its lesson and currently uses the US to deal with Taiwan. In the belief that the road from Beijing to Taipei leads through Washington, they have kicked the ball over to the Americans. US officials therefore use various moralistic ways of persuading Taiwan in order to let Beijing see that they indeed have worked hard to deal with Taipei. At the same time, the US worries that Beijing (particularly the military hardliners) will force President Hu Jintao (
The US has, on several occasions, stated that it opposes Chinese use of armed force to solve the conflict with Taiwan. It has also made some preventive assessments of a few possible radical actions by Beijing, and it will have various scenarios prepared in response to a Chinese concentration of arms in southern China, military exercises, or armed threats against Taiwan.
Have the Americans not heard Taiwan's repeated explanations to Washington? We believe that American diplomats shall use various channels to explain to the White House, Congress and public that a defensive referendum is aimed at promoting and deepening Taiwanese democracy. Although the Referendum Law (
We want to make the Taiwanese public understand that a defensive referendum is necessary for the security of the nation. China has almost 500 missiles aimed at this country. Can we pretend that they do not exist? One of the topics for the defensive referendum is to make the public clarify whether or not they approve of China's removing theses missiles.
Beijing constantly belittles Taiwan, and wants to make it a special administrative region like Hong Kong or Macau. Another topic for the defensive referendum is allowing people to express whether they approve of Beijing's "one country, two systems" model.
A clarification of the public's position on these topics would be persuasive in strengthening national security by making the international community understand that Taiwan does not want to be threatened by, or be part of, China.
Parris Chang is a Democratic Progressive Party legislator.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS